Co-authorship networks in social sciences: The case of Turkey

被引:0
|
作者
Cédric Gossart
Müge Özman
机构
[1] ETOS / CEMANTIC,Institut TELECOM, TELECOM & Management Sud Paris
[2] Universite Louis Pasteur,Bureau d’Economie Théorique et Appliquée
[3] Middle East Technical University,Science and Technology Policy Studies
来源
Scientometrics | 2009年 / 78卷
关键词
Turkey; Betweenness Centrality; Research Collaboration; Patent Citation; Scientific Collaboration;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We analyse the co-authorship networks of researchers affiliated at universities in Turkey by using two databases: the international SSCI database and the Turkish ULAKBIM database. We find that co-authorship networks are composed largely of isolated groups and there is little intersection between the two databases, permitting little knowledge diffusion. There seems to be two disparate populations of researchers. While some scholars publish mostly in the international journals, others target the national audience, and there is very little intersection between the two populations. The same observation is valid for universities, among which there is very little collaboration. Our results point out that while Turkish social sciences and humanities publications have been growing impressively in the last decade, domestic networks to ensure the dissemination of knowledge and of research output are very weak and should be supported by domestic policies.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 345
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Analysis of Significance and Evolution of Co-authorship Networks
    Kudelka, Milos
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL AFRO-EUROPEAN CONFERENCE FOR INDUSTRIAL ADVANCEMENT (AECIA 2015), 2016, 427 : 3 - 4
  • [32] Authorship, Co-Authorship, and Multiple Authorship
    Hick, Darren Hudson
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AESTHETICS AND ART CRITICISM, 2014, 72 (02): : 147 - 156
  • [33] Co-authorship Networks in Swiss Political Research
    Leifeld, Philip
    Ingold, Karin
    [J]. SWISS POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2016, 22 (02) : 264 - 287
  • [34] Evolution of interdependent co-authorship and citation networks
    Chakresh Kumar Singh
    Demival Vasques Filho
    Shivakumar Jolad
    Dion R. J. O’Neale
    [J]. Scientometrics, 2020, 125 : 385 - 404
  • [35] Co-authorship networks in electronic markets research
    Fischbach, Kai
    Putzke, Johannes
    Schoder, Detlef
    [J]. ELECTRONIC MARKETS, 2011, 21 (01) : 19 - 40
  • [36] Visualizing Co-authorship networks in online wikipedia
    Biuk-Aghai, Robert P.
    [J]. 2006 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES,VOLS 1-3, 2006, : 787 - 792
  • [37] Research topic flows in co-authorship networks
    Schaefermeier, Bastian
    Hirth, Johannes
    Hanika, Tom
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2023, 128 (09) : 5051 - 5078
  • [38] Tourism Research Co-authorship Networks in China
    Zhang, Jiekuan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHINA TOURISM RESEARCH, 2015, 11 (04) : 424 - 439
  • [39] Co-authorship networks in electronic markets research
    Kai Fischbach
    Johannes Putzke
    Detlef Schoder
    [J]. Electronic Markets, 2011, 21 : 19 - 40
  • [40] Detecting Strong Cliques in Co-authorship Networks
    Papik, Lukas
    Ochodkova, Eliska
    Kudelka, Milos
    [J]. COMPLEX NETWORKS & THEIR APPLICATIONS XII, VOL 2, COMPLEX NETWORKS 2023, 2024, 1142 : 197 - 208