Comparative evaluation of extraction methods for apoplastic proteins from maize leaves

被引:0
|
作者
Katja Witzel
Muhammad Shahzad
Andrea Matros
Hans-Peter Mock
Karl H Mühling
机构
[1] Christian Albrechts University,Institute of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science
[2] Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research,undefined
[3] Leibniz Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops,undefined
来源
关键词
Apoplast; liquid chromatography mass spectrometry; maize; proteome analysis; two-dimensional gel electrophoresis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Proteins in the plant apoplast are essential for many physiological processes. We have analysed and compared six different infiltration solutions for proteins contained in the apoplast to recognize the most suitable method for leaves and to establish proteome maps for each extraction. The efficiency of protocols was evaluated by comparing the protein patterns resolved by 1-DE and 2-DE, and revealed distinct characteristics for each infiltration solution. Nano-LC-ESI-Q-TOF MS analysis of all fractions was applied to cover all proteins differentially extracted by infiltration solutions and led to the identification of 328 proteins in total in apoplast preparations. The predicted subcellular protein localisation distinguished the examined infiltration solutions in those with high or low amounts of intracellular protein contaminations, and with high or low quantities of secreted proteins. All tested infiltration solution extracted different subsets of proteins, and those implications on apoplast-specific studies are discussed.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] THE APPEARANCE OF PHOTOSYNTHETIC PROTEINS IN DEVELOPING MAIZE LEAVES
    MAYFIELD, SP
    TAYLOR, WC
    PLANTA, 1984, 161 (06) : 481 - 486
  • [22] Comparative study on the extraction of apigenin from parsley leaves (Petroselinum crispum L.) by ultrasonic and microwave methods
    Fatemeh Poureini
    Maedeh Mohammadi
    Ghasem D. Najafpour
    Maryam Nikzad
    Chemical Papers, 2020, 74 : 3857 - 3871
  • [23] Comparative Several Extraction Methods of Genomic DNA from Tripterygium wilfordii Hook. f. Leaves
    XING Jian-hong1
    2. Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
    Medicinal Plant, 2010, (03) : 12 - 14
  • [24] Extraction of Phenolic Compounds from Fresh Leaves: A Comparison of Methods
    Torti, S. D.
    Dearing, M. D.
    Kursar, T. A.
    Journal of Controlled Release, 1600, 33 (01):
  • [25] Comparative study on the extraction of apigenin from parsley leaves (Petroselinum crispum L.) by ultrasonic and microwave methods
    Poureini, Fatemeh
    Mohammadi, Maedeh
    Najafpour, Ghasem D.
    Nikzad, Maryam
    CHEMICAL PAPERS, 2020, 74 (11): : 3857 - 3871
  • [26] Comparison of Different Extraction Methods for Flavonoids and Polyphenols from Manilkara Zapota Leaves and Evaluation of Antioxidant Activity
    Ma, Fei-Yue
    Zhang, Xiu-Mei
    Liu, Yu-Ge
    Fu, Qiong
    Ma, Zhi-Ling
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ENERGY SCIENCE AND CHEMICAL ENGINEERING (ISESCE 2015), 2016, 45 : 171 - 175
  • [27] Extraction of apoplastic sap from plant roots by centrifugation
    Yu, Q
    Tang, C
    Chen, Z
    Kuo, J
    NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 1999, 143 (02) : 299 - 304
  • [28] Comparative evaluation of feature extraction methods for human motion detection
    Multidimensional Data Analysis and Knowledge Management Laboratory, Dept. of Computer Engineering and Informatics, University of Patras, Rion-Patras
    26500, Greece
    IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, (146-154):
  • [29] A Comparative Evaluation of Six Principal IgY Antibody Extraction Methods
    Ren, Hao
    Yang, Wenjing
    Thirumalai, Diraviyam
    Zhang, Xiaoying
    Schade, Ruediger
    ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2016, 44 (01): : 11 - 20
  • [30] Green technologies for the extraction of proteins from jackfruit leaves (Artocarpus heterophyllusLam)
    Cristina Moreno-Najera, Laura
    Arturo Ragazzo-Sanchez, Juan
    Regla Gaston-Pena, Cristina
    Calderon-Santoyo, Montserrat
    FOOD SCIENCE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2020, 29 (12) : 1675 - 1684