Stochastic optimization of acoustic response – a numerical and experimental comparison

被引：0

作者：

M. Tinnsten

P. Carlsson

M. Jonsson

机构：

[1] Dept. of Technology and Resource Management,

[2] Mid Sweden University,undefined

[3] 831 25 Östersund,undefined

[4] Sweden e-mail: Mats.Tinnsten@mh.se,undefined

[5] Peter.Carlsson@mh.se,undefined

[6] Division of Computer Aided Design,undefined

[7] Luleå University of Technology,undefined

[8] 971 87 Luleå Sweden e-mail: Mikael.Jonsson@mt.luth.se,undefined

来源：

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization | 2002年 / 23卷

关键词：

Key words: acoustic optimization, stochastic optimization, optimization, BEM, acoustics;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

The objective of the work presented is to compare results from numerical optimization with experimental data and to highlight and discuss the differences between two fundamentally different optimization methods. The problem domain is minimization of acoustic emission and the structure used in the work is a closed cylinder with forced vibration of one end. The optimization method used in this paper is simulated annealing (SA), a stochastic method. The results are compared with those from a gradient-based method used on the same structure in an earlier paper (see Tinnsten 2000).

引用

页码：405 / 411

页数：6

共 50 条

[31] Experimental and Numerical Acoustic Characterization of Laminated Floors
Gadea Borrell, J. M.
Segura Alcaraz, J. G.
Julia Sanchis, E.
EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 40 (02) : 857 - 863
[32] Experimental and numerical investigations of a smart acoustic box
Laugwitz, F.
Lefevre, J.
Schmidt, G.
Nestorovic, T.
Gabbert, U.
Proceedings of ISMA2006: International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering, Vols 1-8, 2006, : 223 - 232
[33] Numerical modelling and experimental analysis of acoustic emission
Gerasimov, S. I.
Sych, T. V.
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES IN BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY 2018, PTS 1-4, 2018, 1015
[34] Experimental and Numerical Acoustic Characterization of Laminated Floors
J. M. Gadea Borrell
J. G. Segura Alcaraz
E. Julia Sanchis
Experimental Techniques, 2016, 40 : 857 - 863
[35] Experimental and numerical studies of the response of photo-mask hard pellicles. to acoustic excitation
Cotte, EP
Reu, PL
Engelstad, RL
Lovell, EG
Grenville, A
Van Peski, CK
22ND ANNUAL BACUS SYMPOSIUM ON PHOTOMASK TECHNOLOGY, PTS 1 AND 2, 2002, 4889 : 1121 - 1132
[36] On non-linear response of polyester tanks: Comparison of experimental and numerical results
Brank, B
Makarovic, M
ADVANCED MULTILAYERED AND FIBRE-REINFORCED COMPOSITES, 1998, 43 : 497 - 508
[37] Comparison of numerical models for Acoustic Emission propagation
Chiappa, A.
Giorgetti, F.
Marzani, A.
Messina, M.
Augugliaro, G.
Mennuti, C.
Biancolini, E.
AIAS 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON STRESS ANALYSIS, 2018, 12 : 353 - 369
[38] Comparison of Numerical and Experimental Data in Multi-objective Optimization of a Thermoplastic Molded Part
Natalini, M.
Sasso, M.
Amodio, D.
INTERNATIONAL POLYMER PROCESSING, 2013, 28 (01) : 84 - 106
[39] Numerical shape optimization based on meshless method and stochastic optimization technique
S. D. Daxini
J. M. Prajapati
Engineering with Computers, 2020, 36 : 565 - 586
[40] Numerical shape optimization based on meshless method and stochastic optimization technique
Daxini, S. D.
Prajapati, J. M.
ENGINEERING WITH COMPUTERS, 2020, 36 (02) : 565 - 586

← 1 2 3 4 5 →