Integrated Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Model for Acetaminophen, Ibuprofen, and Placebo Antipyresis in Children

被引:0
|
作者
R. Don Brown
Gregory L. Kearns
John T. Wilson
机构
[1] Louisiana State University Medical Center,Section on Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pediatrics
[2] University of Missouri-Kansas City,Department of Pediatrics
[3] and Section of Pediatric Clinical Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics,undefined
[4] The Children's Mercy Hospital,undefined
关键词
acetaminophen; age; antipyretic; fever; ibuprofen; pediatrics; pharmacokinetics; pharmacodynamics; temperature;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A descriptive profile for antipyretic drug action has been documented for children. However, a linked pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model is central to the understanding of antipyretic drug action in febrile children. This was examined for previously reported data from 178 febrile children who received a single oral dose of acetaminophen (APAP) (12.5 mg/kg), ibuprofen (IBU) (5 or 10 mg/kg), or placebo. Rectal temperatures and plasma levels (μg/ml) of APAP and IBU were measured for up to 12 hr after drug administration. Nonlinear regression analyses were applied to these measurements and yielded simultaneous solutions of an integrated one-compartment PK, link, and SigmoidEmaxeffect model in 102/153 febrile children given APAP or IBU. The PK parameters (tlag,ka, β,T1/2β,AUC0–∞,Vd/F,andClp/F) were not different than those reported previously, except the APAPkawas significantly lower. The link component yieldedkeos of 0.58±0.06 (X±SE), 0.70±0.11 and 0.57 ± 0.11 hr-1for APAP, IBU05, and IBU10, respectively: the SigmoidEmaxcomponent yieldedEC50s (μg/ml) and sigmoidicity (γ) of 4.63±0.39 and 3.98±0.42 for APAP, 11.33±1.35 and 3.97±0.58 for IBU05 and 12.83±1.89 and 4.27±0.63 for IBU10. On visual inspection of the efficacy–time profiles of the febrile children, a number of them had an apparent linear function (slope; Δ°C/hr) and/or a sinusoidal cyclic function “confounding” standard approaches to PD analysis. Thus, the temperature profiles of 91/102 children given APAP or IBU required the addition of a slope (Δ°C/hr) and/or a sinusoidal cyclic function to the SigmoidEmaxcomponent to fit the data satisfactorily. All 22 children given a placebo also required a slope and/or a cyclic function in their PD model. The residual Δ°Cs (observed-predicted) of the placebo group were not significantly different from 0. Thus, no placebo antipyretic effect was observed. Dose dependency of IBUAUC0–∞was confirmed; doubling the dose from 5 to 10 mg/kg increased theAUC0→∞by only 1.5-fold. The confounding effect of initial temperature (Tempi) on antipyretic efficacy in all treatment groups except placebo was also confirmed to expose nonlinear pharmacodynamics. A significant (p=0.03) contribution ofTempi(but not age) on the value of the slope function was found. There was no consistent effect of age orTempi, on the cyclic component of the integrated model of antipyresis. In addition, a multiple linear relationship of age andTempiwas observed with a large number of the PK, link, and PD variables in those who received IBU. Dose, age, andTempiinteracted with β in a significant multiple linear relationship withAUC0–∞. The effects of IBU dose, age, andTempiare pervasive and cascade down the chain of events leading to the PD response. The etiology of pyresis may create the slope function, the magnitude of which may be partially due to the underlying disease. In some cases, the cyclic function may be explained by temperature regulation. Regardless of their cause, both confound analysis of drug action and make the simple, unmodified SigmoidEMaxeffect model less than satisfactory for interpretation of antipyretic drug effects. The influence of Tempion the magnitude of antipyretic drug response is also a finding with major impact on PD investigations of antipyretic medications. In children receiving IBU, dose and age are also confounders, in addition toTempi. A multiplicity of covariables must be taken into account when developing appropriate dosing regimens for these antipyretics in febrile children.
引用
收藏
页码:559 / 579
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Propofol in Children
    Rigouzzo, Agnes
    Servin, Frederique
    Constant, Isabelle
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2010, 113 (02) : 343 - 352
  • [42] Pharmacokinetic pharmacodynamic modeling of analgesics and sedatives in children
    Bardol, Maddlie
    Pan, Shan
    Walker, Suellen M.
    Standing, Joseph F.
    Dawes, Joy M.
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2023, 33 (10) : 781 - 792
  • [43] The integrated use of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models for the definition of breakpoints
    Stass, H
    Dalhoff, A
    INFECTION, 2005, 33 (Suppl 2) : 29 - 35
  • [45] Ibuprofen or acetaminophen for the acute treatment of migraine in children: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study
    Hamalainen, ML
    Hoppu, K
    Valkeila, E
    Santavuori, P
    NEUROLOGY, 1997, 48 (01) : 103 - 107
  • [46] Vancomycin dose optimisation comparing a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model versus the pharmacokinetic model
    Linana Granell, Carla
    Belles Medall, M. Dolores
    Ferrando Piqueres, Raul
    Montanes Pauls, Belen
    Alvarez Martin, Tamara
    Mendoza Aguilera, Maria
    Garcia Martinez, Teresa
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 2019, 26 (01) : 16 - 22
  • [47] Risk of acute exacerbation between acetaminophen and ibuprofen in children with asthma
    Fu, Lin-Shien
    Lin, Che-Chen
    Wei, Chia-Yi
    Lin, Ching-Heng
    Huang, Yung-Chieh
    PEERJ, 2019, 7
  • [48] Acetaminophen versus Ibuprofen in Young Children with Mild Persistent Asthma
    Sheehan, W. J.
    Mauger, D. T.
    Paul, I. M.
    Moy, J. N.
    Boehmer, S. J.
    Szefler, S. J.
    Fitzpatrick, A. M.
    Jackson, D. J.
    Bacharier, L. B.
    Cabana, M. D.
    Covar, R.
    Holguin, F.
    Lemanske, R. F., Jr.
    Martinez, F. D.
    Pongracic, J. A.
    Beigelman, A.
    Baxi, S. N.
    Benson, M.
    Blake, K.
    Chmiel, J. F.
    Daines, C. L.
    Daines, M. O.
    Gaffin, J. M.
    Gentile, D. A.
    Gower, W. A.
    Israel, E.
    Kumar, H. V.
    Lang, J. E.
    Lazarus, S. C.
    Lima, J. J.
    Ly, N.
    Marbin, J.
    Morgan, W. J.
    Myers, R. E.
    Olin, J. T.
    Peters, S. P.
    Raissy, H. H.
    Robison, R. G.
    Ross, K.
    Sorkness, C. A.
    Thyne, S. M.
    Wechsler, M. E.
    Phipatanakul, W.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 375 (07): : 619 - 630
  • [49] COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF IBUPROFEN (IBU) AND ACETAMINOPHEN (APAP) IN FEBRILE CHILDREN
    WILSON, JT
    BROWN, RD
    KEARNS, GL
    EICHLER, VF
    JONES, ED
    CEDOTAL, CJ
    GUPTA, N
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1990, 183 (06) : 2277 - 2278
  • [50] Evidence not persuasive for recommending a combination of ibuprofen and acetaminophen for feverish children
    Hamden, Anthony
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2009, 154 (03): : 461 - 462