Gender dynamics on Twitter during the 2020 U.S. Democratic presidential primary

被引:0
|
作者
Catherine King
Kathleen M. Carley
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon University,Software and Societal Systems Department
关键词
Computational social science; Social media analytics; 2020 U.S. election; Abusive language;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Twitter social network for each of the top five U.S. Democratic presidential candidates in 2020 was analyzed to determine if there were any differences in the treatment of the candidates. This data set was collected from discussions of the presidential primary between December 2019 through April 2020. It was then separated into five sets,  one for each candidate. We found that the most discussed candidates, President Biden and Senator Sanders, received by far the most engagement from verified users and news agencies even before the Iowa caucuses, which was ultimately won by Mayor Buttigieg. The most popular candidates were also generally targeted more frequently by bots, trolls, and other aggressive users. However, the abusive language targeting the top two female candidates, Senators Warren and Klobuchar, included slightly more gendered and sexist language compared with the other candidates. Additionally, sexist slurs that ordinarily describe women were used more frequently than male slurs in all candidate data sets. Our results indicate that there may still be an undercurrent of sexist stereotypes permeating the social media conversation surrounding female U.S. presidential candidates.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Gender dynamics on Twitter during the 2020 US Democratic presidential primary
    King, Catherine
    Carley, Kathleen M.
    [J]. SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS AND MINING, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [2] Politics and Politeness: Analysis of Incivility on Twitter During the 2020 Democratic Presidential Primary
    Trifiro, Briana
    Paik, Sejin
    Fang, Zhixin
    Zhang, Li
    [J]. SOCIAL MEDIA + SOCIETY, 2021, 7 (03):
  • [3] Gender, Politeness, and the 2020 Democratic Presidential Primary Debates
    Hinck, Robert S.
    Hinck, Edward A.
    Hinck, Shelly S.
    Dailey, William O.
    [J]. WESTERN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2024, 88 (02) : 328 - 351
  • [4] Network Issue Agendas on Twitter During the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election
    Vargo, Chris J.
    Guo, Lei
    McCombs, Maxwell
    Shaw, Donald L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2014, 64 (02) : 296 - 316
  • [5] Competing for attention on Twitter during the 2012 and 2016 U.S. presidential debates
    Lukito, Josephine
    Pevehouse, Jon C. W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & POLITICS, 2023, 20 (02) : 125 - 138
  • [6] Democratic Norms, Social Projection, and False Consensus in the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election
    Weinschenk, Aaron C.
    Panagopoulos, Costas
    van der Linden, Sander
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL MARKETING, 2021, 20 (3-4) : 255 - 268
  • [7] The Democratic Divide in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election
    Nam, Taewoo
    Stromer-Galley, Jennifer
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & POLITICS, 2012, 9 (02) : 133 - 149
  • [8] 280 characters to the White House: predicting 2020 U.S. presidential elections from twitter data
    Rodrigue Rizk
    Dominick Rizk
    Frederic Rizk
    Sonya Hsu
    [J]. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 2023, 29 : 542 - 569
  • [9] The 2020 U.S. presidential election: A litmus test
    Kasadha, Juma
    Zhang, Nan
    Mpoza, Abdulhamid
    Alli, Adam A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [10] Characterizing the 2016 U.S. Presidential Campaign using Twitter Data
    Vegas, Ignasi
    Tian, Tina
    Xiong, Wei
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2016, 7 (10) : 12 - 19