Gender dynamics on Twitter during the 2020 US Democratic presidential primary

被引:0
|
作者
King, Catherine [1 ]
Carley, Kathleen M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Software & Soc Syst Dept, 5000 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
Computational social science; Social media analytics; 2020; U; S; election; Abusive language; NEWS;
D O I
10.1007/s13278-023-01045-4
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The Twitter social network for each of the top five U.S. Democratic presidential candidates in 2020 was analyzed to determine if there were any differences in the treatment of the candidates. This data set was collected from discussions of the presidential primary between December 2019 through April 2020. It was then separated into five sets, one for each candidate. We found that the most discussed candidates, President Biden and Senator Sanders, received by far the most engagement from verified users and news agencies even before the Iowa caucuses, which was ultimately won by Mayor Buttigieg. The most popular candidates were also generally targeted more frequently by bots, trolls, and other aggressive users. However, the abusive language targeting the top two female candidates, Senators Warren and Klobuchar, included slightly more gendered and sexist language compared with the other candidates. Additionally, sexist slurs that ordinarily describe women were used more frequently than male slurs in all candidate data sets. Our results indicate that there may still be an undercurrent of sexist stereotypes permeating the social media conversation surrounding female U.S. presidential candidates.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Gender dynamics on Twitter during the 2020 U.S. Democratic presidential primary
    Catherine King
    Kathleen M. Carley
    Social Network Analysis and Mining, 13
  • [2] Politics and Politeness: Analysis of Incivility on Twitter During the 2020 Democratic Presidential Primary
    Trifiro, Briana
    Paik, Sejin
    Fang, Zhixin
    Zhang, Li
    SOCIAL MEDIA + SOCIETY, 2021, 7 (03):
  • [3] Gender, Politeness, and the 2020 Democratic Presidential Primary Debates
    Hinck, Robert S.
    Hinck, Edward A.
    Hinck, Shelly S.
    Dailey, William O.
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2024, 88 (02) : 328 - 351
  • [4] Democratic candidates in the 2020 US presidential primary: The portrayal of race, gender, and age in editorial cartoons
    Zurbriggen, Eileen L.
    Vallerga, Michael
    ANALYSES OF SOCIAL ISSUES AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2022, 22 (01) : 6 - 29
  • [5] Perceived gender and political persuasion: a social media field experiment during the 2020 US Democratic presidential primary election
    Aidan Combs
    Graham Tierney
    Fatima Alqabandi
    Devin Cornell
    Gabriel Varela
    Andrés Castro Araújo
    Lisa P. Argyle
    Christopher A. Bail
    Alexander Volfovsky
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [6] Perceived gender and political persuasion: a social media field experiment during the 2020 US Democratic presidential primary election
    Combs, Aidan
    Tierney, Graham
    Alqabandi, Fatima
    Cornell, Devin
    Varela, Gabriel
    Araujo, Andres Castro
    Argyle, Lisa P.
    Bail, Christopher A.
    Volfovsky, Alexander
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [7] Explainable machine learning pipeline for Twitter bot detection during the 2020 US Presidential Elections
    Shevtsov, Alexander
    Tzagkarakis, Christos
    Antonakaki, Despoina
    Ioannidis, Sotiris
    SOFTWARE IMPACTS, 2022, 13
  • [8] #Election2020: the first public Twitter dataset on the 2020 US Presidential election
    Chen, Emily
    Deb, Ashok
    Ferrara, Emilio
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2022, 5 (01): : 1 - 18
  • [9] #Election2020: the first public Twitter dataset on the 2020 US Presidential election
    Emily Chen
    Ashok Deb
    Emilio Ferrara
    Journal of Computational Social Science, 2022, 5 : 1 - 18
  • [10] Public Opinion and the Candidate Spouses in the 2020 Democratic Presidential Primary
    Frederick, Brian
    Elder, Laurel
    FORUM-A JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN CONTEMPORARY POLITICS, 2022, 20 (02): : 275 - 292