Comparison of purse-string technique vs linear suture for skin closure after ileostomy reversal. A randomized controlled trial

Background Protective stoma after rectal surgery has been associated with important complications. The most common is surgical site infection (SSI) high rates after stoma reversal reported in literature. Our study compared the rate of SSI of two skin closure techniques, linear closure, and purse string closure. Methods We carried out a single center, prospective, randomized controlled trial in the Department of Colorectal Surgery of Fondazione Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico of Rome between January 2018 through December 2021, to compare LC vs PS closure of ileostomy sites. Results A total of 117 patients (53.84% male) with a mean age of 65.68 +/- 14.33 years were finally evaluated in the study. 58 patients were included in the PS group and 59 patients in the LC one.<br /> There was a marked difference in the SSI rate between the two arms of the study: 3 of 58 patients in the purse-string arm versus 11 of 59 in the control arm (p = 0.043).<br /> The outcome of cosmesis was also higher in PS, with a statistical significance (mean +/- DS 4,01 +/- 0,73 for PS group vs mean +/- DS 2,38 +/- 0,72 for LC group, p < 0,001). Conclusion Our study demonstrated that the PS technique had a significantly lower incidence of stoma site SSI compared with LC technique. Our findings are in line with other randomized studies and suggest that PS closure could be considered as standard of care for wound closure after ileostomy reversal.