The adjustment process of accruals: Empirical evidence and implication for accrual research

被引:0
|
作者
Nwaeze E.T. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] School of Business, Rutgers University, Camden
[2] School of Business, Rutgers University, Camden
关键词
Accrual adjustment process; Managed accruals; Model specification;
D O I
10.1023/A:1017977705697
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study analyzes the intertemporal behavior of accruals and uses the results to offer some perspectives on models of accruals. Separate adjustment rates are estimated for total and managed accruals and further compared to assess the influence of managers on accrual adjustment. Analysis is further performed to test whether there is an industry-specific adjustment rate for either total or managed accruals. The results show that both the total and managed accruals follow a partial adjustment process rather than a pure-adjustment or random-walk process. Nonetheless, managed accruals exhibit longer adjustment length than total accruals in each industry sample. In addition, total and managed accruals appear to follow certain adjustment patterns that are industry-specific, consistent with the view that common industry practices and norms lead to benchmark adjustment rates to which industry firms conform. Based on the results showing that accruals exhibit lagged and industry-specific adjustments, an extension of the modified Jones model is proposed. The extended model incorporates lagged accruals and an industry accrual index in an attempt to exploit the lagged-adjustment and industry effects and, in that context, improve the temporal classification of accrual innovations. Simple tests show that the extended model achieves substantial improvements in specification over the modified Jones model. © 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 211
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Emerging empirical evidence on the ethics of schizophrenia research
    Dunn, LB
    Candilis, PJ
    Roberts, LW
    [J]. SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2006, 32 (01) : 47 - 68
  • [42] Megaproject Research Paradigms: The Value of Empirical Evidence
    Greiman, Virginia
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH METHODOLOGY FOR BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT STUDIES (ECRM 2014), 2014, : 169 - 176
  • [43] Patents and Research Investments: Assessing the Empirical Evidence
    Budish, Eric
    Roin, Benjamin N.
    Williams, Heidi
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2016, 106 (05): : 183 - 187
  • [44] Recovery research: the empirical evidence from England
    Slade, Mike
    [J]. WORLD PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 11 (03) : 162 - 163
  • [45] Introduction: Workshop on Empirical Translation Process Research
    Carl, Michael
    Yamada, Masaru
    Zou, Longhui
    [J]. AMTA 2022 - 15th Conference of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas, Proceedings - Workshop on Empirical Translation Process Research, 2022, 1
  • [46] Operationalizing the Disablement Process Model for Empirical Research
    Lane, N. E.
    Boyd, C.
    Stukel, T. A.
    Wodchis, W. P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2016, 64 : S233 - S233
  • [47] Empirical Evidence of the Usage of Programming Languages in the Educational Process
    Vinueza-Morales, Mariuxi
    Borrego, Diana
    A. Galindo, Jose
    Benavides, David
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EDUCATION, 2021, 64 (03) : 213 - 222
  • [48] An empirical evidence of factors in equity selection process in Malaysia
    Chong, Tun-Pin
    Lai, Ming-Ming
    [J]. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2011, 5 (15): : 6221 - 6232
  • [49] Strategic change in the turnaround process: Theory and empirical evidence
    Barker, VL
    Duhaime, IM
    [J]. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1997, 18 (01) : 13 - 38
  • [50] Process Mining for Process Conformance Checking in an OSS Project: An Empirical Research
    Kouzari, Elia
    Sotiriadis, Lazaros
    Stamelos, Ioannis
    [J]. OPEN SOURCE SYSTEMS: ENTERPRISE SOFTWARE AND SOLUTIONS, OSS 2018, 2018, 525 : 79 - 89