The DNA damage signalling kinase ATM is aberrantly reduced or lost in BRCA1/BRCA2-deficient and ER/PR/ERBB2-triple-negative breast cancer

被引:0
|
作者
J Tommiska
J Bartkova
M Heinonen
L Hautala
O Kilpivaara
H Eerola
K Aittomäki
B Hofstetter
J Lukas
K von Smitten
C Blomqvist
A Ristimäki
P Heikkilä
J Bartek
H Nevanlinna
机构
[1] Helsinki University Central Hospital (HUCH),Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
[2] Institute of Cancer Biology and Centre for Genotoxic Stress Research,Department of Surgery
[3] Danish Cancer Society,Department of Oncology
[4] Department of Pathology/HUSLAB and Haartman Institute,undefined
[5] Genome-Scale Biology Program,undefined
[6] Biomedicum Helsinki,undefined
[7] University of Helsinki,undefined
[8] Department of Oncology,undefined
[9] Department of Clinical Genetics,undefined
[10] Helsinki University Central Hospital,undefined
[11] Uppsala University Hospital,undefined
来源
Oncogene | 2008年 / 27卷
关键词
DNA damage response; triple-negative breast cancer; BRCA1/BRCA2 familial cancer; ATM defects; genetic instability;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) kinase is a key transducer of DNA damage signals within the genome maintenance machinery and a tumour suppressor whose germline mutations predispose to familial breast cancer. ATM signalling is constitutively activated in early stages of diverse types of human malignancies and cell culture models in response to oncogene-induced DNA damage providing a barrier against tumour progression. As BRCA1 and BRCA2 are also components of the genome maintenance network and their mutations predispose to breast cancer, we have examined the ATM expression in human breast carcinomas of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, sporadic cases and familial non-BRCA1/2 patients. Our results show that ATM protein expression is aberrantly reduced more frequently among BRCA1 (33%; P=0.0003) and BRCA2 (30%; P=0.0009) tumours than in non-BRCA1/2 tumours (10.7%). Furthermore, the non-BRCA1/2 tumours with reduced ATM expression were more often estrogen receptor (ER) negative (P=0.0002), progesterone receptor (PR) negative (P=0.004) and were of higher grade (P=0.0004). In our series of 1013 non-BRCA1/2 cases, ATM was more commonly deficient (20%; P=0.0006) and p53 was overabundant (47%; P<0.0000000001) among the difficult-to-treat ER/PR/ERBB2-triple-negative subset of tumours compared with cases that expressed at least one of these receptors (10 and 16% of aberrant ATM and p53, respectively). We propose a model of ‘conditional haploinsufficiency’ for BRCA1/2 under conditions of enhanced DNA damage in precancerous lesions resulting in more robust activation and hence increased selection for inactivation or loss of ATM in tumours of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, with implications for genomic instability and curability of diverse subsets of human breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:2501 / 2506
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Risk of cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation-positive and -negative breast cancer families (Finland)
    Eerola, H
    Pukkala, E
    Pyrhönen, S
    Blomqvist, C
    Sankila, R
    Nevanlinna, H
    CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2001, 12 (08) : 739 - 746
  • [42] Risk of cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation-positive and -negative breast cancer families (Finland)
    Hannaleena Eerola
    Eero Pukkala
    Seppo Pyrhönen
    Carl Blomqvist
    Risto Sankila
    Heli Nevanlinna
    Cancer Causes & Control, 2001, 12 : 739 - 746
  • [43] BRCA1/2-negative hereditary triple-negative breast cancers exhibit BRCAness
    Domagala, Pawel
    Hybiak, Jolanta
    Cybulski, Cezary
    Lubinski, Jan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 140 (07) : 1545 - 1550
  • [44] Germline mutations in cancer susceptibility genes in brca1 and brca2 negative families with ovarian and breast cancer
    Norquist, B.
    Harrell, M.
    Walsh, T.
    Mandell, J.
    Agnew, K.
    Lee, M.
    Pennington, K.
    King, M. C.
    Swisher, E.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2014, 135 (02) : 383 - 383
  • [45] Breast cancer risks in individuals testing negative for a known family mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2
    Domchek, S. M.
    Gaudet, M. M.
    Stopfer, J. E.
    Fleischaut, M. H.
    Powers, J.
    Kauff, N.
    Offit, K.
    Nathanson, K. L.
    Robson, M.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2010, 119 (02) : 409 - 414
  • [46] Breast cancer risks in individuals testing negative for a known family mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2
    S. M. Domchek
    M. M. Gaudet
    J. E. Stopfer
    M. H. Fleischaut
    J. Powers
    N. Kauff
    K. Offit
    K. L. Nathanson
    M. Robson
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2010, 119 : 409 - 414
  • [47] Germline ATM mutational analysis in BRCA1/BRCA2 negative hereditary breast cancer families by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry
    Grana, B.
    Fachal, L.
    Darder, E.
    Balmana, J.
    Ramon y Cajal, T.
    Blanco, I.
    Torres, A.
    Lazaro, C.
    Diez, O.
    Alonso, C.
    Santamarina, M.
    Velasco, A.
    Teule, A.
    Lasa, A.
    Blanco, A.
    Izquierdo, A.
    Borras, J.
    Gutierrez-Enriquez, S.
    Vega, A.
    Brunet, J.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2011, 128 (02) : 573 - 579
  • [48] Germline ATM mutational analysis in BRCA1/BRCA2 negative hereditary breast cancer families by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry
    B. Graña
    L. Fachal
    E. Darder
    J. Balmaña
    T. Ramón y Cajal
    I. Blanco
    A. Torres
    C. Lázaro
    O. Diez
    C. Alonso
    M. Santamariña
    A. Velasco
    A. Teulé
    A. Lasa
    A. Blanco
    A. Izquierdo
    J. Borràs
    S. Gutiérrez-Enríquez
    A. Vega
    J. Brunet
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2011, 128 : 573 - 579
  • [49] Evaluation of BRCA1/2 mutation status among women with triple-negative breast cancer.
    Muendlein, Axel
    Rhode, Bettina
    Gasser, Klaus
    Kinz, Elena
    Drexel, Heinz
    Hofmann, Wera
    Schindler, Verena
    Kapoor, Rita
    Decker, Thomas
    Lang, Alois
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (15)
  • [50] Breast Cancer in Women with Family History of Breast Cancer who have Tested Negative for BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation
    Kitsera, Nataliya
    Shparyk, Yaroslav
    GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 36 (07) : 742 - 742