Bi-socket ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendons: high versus low femoral socket placement

被引:0
|
作者
Yukiyoshi Toritsuka
Hiroshi Amano
Yuzo Yamada
Masayuki Hamada
Tomoki Mitsuoka
Shuji Horibe
Konsei Shino
机构
[1] Kansai Rosai Hospital,Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
[2] Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine,Department of Orthopaedics
[3] Hoshigaoka Koseinenkin Hospital,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
[4] Yao City Hospital,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
[5] Osaka Rosai Hospital,Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
[6] Osaka Prefecture University,Faculty of Comprehensive Rehabilitation
来源
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | 2007年 / 15卷
关键词
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Short-term result; Multi-stranded hamstring tendon; Bi-socket procedure;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To clarify the importance of the femoral socket location in bi-socket Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Subjects included 261 patients with an average age of 26 years who received ACL reconstruction via the high-femoral socket procedure (Group H) and 43 patients with an average age of 29 years who received ACL reconstruction via the low-femoral socket procedure (Group L) with a minimal follow-up of 24 months. In Group H, the femoral sockets were created at 1:00 or 11:00 and 2:00–2:30 or 9:30–10:00 of the intercondylar notch. In Group L, the two femoral sockets were drilled at 2:00 or 10:00 and 3:00 or 9:00. For the tibial side, a single tunnel was made at the center of the footprint. Evaluation was performed based on the IKDC Knee Examination Form. While 137 knees (52%) were graded as normal, 100 (38%) as nearly normal, 8 (3%) as abnormal, and 2 (1%) as severely abnormal with 14 (5%) re-injury in Group H, 38 knees (74%) were graded as normal, and 7 (16%) as nearly normal with 3 (7%) re-injury in Group L, showing a better subjective evaluation (P = 0.007). The average side-to-side differences in anterior laxity at manual maximum force with the KT-1000 were 1.1 ± 1.6 mm for Group H and 1.0 ± 1.6 mm for Group L without statistically significant differences excluding re-injured cases. There were 204 patients (83%) from Group H and 33 (83%) from Group L with values between −2 and 2 mm, while 228 (92%) patients from Group H and 38 (95%) from Group L had values distributed between −3 and 3 mm. While the bi-socket ACL reconstruction provided objectively satisfactory clinical outcomes in more than 90% of the patients, the low-femoral socket placement was found to subjectively achieve better outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:835 / 846
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bi-socket ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendons: high versus low femoral socket placement
    Toritsuka, Yukiyoshi
    Amano, Hiroshi
    Yamada, Yuzo
    Hamada, Masayuki
    Mitsuoka, Tomoki
    Horibe, Shuji
    Shino, Konsei
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2007, 15 (07) : 835 - 846
  • [2] Single- versus bi-socket anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autogenous multiple-stranded hamstring tendons with EndoButton femoral fixation: A prospective study
    Hamada, M
    Shino, K
    Horibe, S
    Mitsuoka, T
    Miyama, T
    Shiozaki, Y
    Mae, T
    ARTHROSCOPY, 2001, 17 (08): : 801 - 807
  • [3] Techniques for Femoral Socket Creation in ACL Reconstruction
    Matthewson, Graeme
    Macdonald, Peter
    SPORTS MEDICINE AND ARTHROSCOPY REVIEW, 2020, 28 (02): : 56 - 65
  • [4] Graft length changes in the bi-socket anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison between isometric and anatomic femoral tunnel placement
    Yonetani, Y
    Toritsuka, Y
    Yamada, Y
    Iwahashi, T
    Yoshikawa, H
    Shino, K
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2005, 21 (11): : 1317 - 1322
  • [5] Anatomical two-bundle versus Rosenberg's isometric bi-socket ACL reconstruction: a biomechanical comparison in laxity match pretension
    Mae, Tatsuo
    Shino, Konsei
    Matsumoto, Norinao
    Hamada, Masayuki
    Yoneda, Minoru
    Nakata, Ken
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2007, 15 (04) : 328 - 334
  • [6] Anatomical two-bundle versus Rosenberg’s isometric bi-socket ACL reconstruction: a biomechanical comparison in laxity match pretension
    Tatsuo Mae
    Konsei Shino
    Norinao Matsumoto
    Masayuki Hamada
    Minoru Yoneda
    Ken Nakata
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2007, 15 : 328 - 334
  • [7] Femoral interference screw fixation of hamstring and quadriceps tendons for ACL reconstruction
    M. Ettinger
    T. Werner-Lebeda
    T. Calliess
    M. Omar
    C. Becher
    M. Ezechieli
    M. Klintschar
    M. Petri
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2017, 25 (4) : 1241 - 1248
  • [8] Femoral interference screw fixation of hamstring and quadriceps tendons for ACL reconstruction
    Ettinger, M.
    Werner-Lebeda, T.
    Calliess, T.
    Omar, M.
    Becher, C.
    Ezechieli, M.
    Klintschar, M.
    Petri, M.
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2017, 25 (04) : 1241 - 1248
  • [9] Outcome of double-bundle ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendons
    Toritsuka, Yukiyoshi
    Amano, Hiroshi
    Kuwano, Masahiro
    Iwai, Takao
    Mae, Tatsuo
    Ohzono, Kenji
    Shino, Konsei
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2009, 17 (05) : 456 - 463
  • [10] Outcome of double-bundle ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendons
    Yukiyoshi Toritsuka
    Hiroshi Amano
    Masahiro Kuwano
    Takao Iwai
    Tatsuo Mae
    Kenji Ohzono
    Konsei Shino
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2009, 17 : 456 - 463