Opinion Dynamics Control in a Social Network with a Communication Structure

被引:0
|
作者
Hui Jiang
Vladimir V. Mazalov
Hongwei Gao
Chen Wang
机构
[1] Qingdao University,School of Business
[2] Russian Academy of Sciences,Institute of Applied Mathematical Research, Karelian Research Center
[3] Qingdao University,School of Mathematics and Statistics, Institute of Applied Mathematics of Shandong
来源
关键词
Opinion dynamics; Social network; Influence matrix; Communication structure; Linear-quadratic game; Optimal control; Nash equilibrium; Bellman equation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper considers a game-theoretic model of external control influence on opinion dynamics and reached consensus in a social network. The network participants are linked through an arbitrary communication graph. The goal of control is to keep the opinions of all network participants in the neighborhood of a given value. If there are several players, these target values may differ. The dynamic game under consideration belongs to the class of linear-quadratic games in discrete time. Optimal control and equilibrium are calculated using the Bellman equation. In the symmetric case, the solution is constructed analytically. Some numerical simulations illustrate the influence of the communication structure of a social network on the opinion dynamics and reached consensus.
引用
收藏
页码:412 / 434
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] OPINION DYNAMICS AND COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    Banisch, Sven
    Araujo, Tanya
    Louca, Jorge
    [J]. ADVANCES IN COMPLEX SYSTEMS, 2010, 13 (01): : 95 - 111
  • [22] Opinion dynamics in command and control network with impact of informal organization
    Song, X.
    Shi, W.
    [J]. SCIENTIA IRANICA, 2015, 22 (04) : 1635 - 1641
  • [23] Control of Network Opinion Dynamics by a Selfish Agent with Limited Visibility
    Wendt, Nathan
    Dhal, Chandan
    Roy, Sandip
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2019, 52 (03): : 37 - 42
  • [24] Bounded Confidence Opinion Dynamics in a Social Network of Bayesian Decision Makers
    Varshney, Kush R.
    [J]. IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2014, 8 (04) : 576 - 585
  • [25] Centrality-Weighted Opinion Dynamics: Disagreement and Social Network Partition
    Gao, Shuang
    [J]. 2021 60TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2021, : 5496 - 5501
  • [26] Modeling Opinion Dynamics in a Social Network Using Markov Random Field
    Kandhway, Kundan
    [J]. 2018 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS & NETWORKS (COMSNETS), 2018, : 631 - 636
  • [27] Opinion dynamics with intermittent-influence leaders on the signed social network
    Shen, Ziwen
    He, Guang
    Wu, Xiaotai
    Zhu, Yixin
    Shen, Mingxuan
    [J]. ENGINEERING REPORTS, 2023, 5 (09)
  • [28] Study On Coupled Social Network Public Opinion Communication Based On Improved SEIR
    Jiang, Changbin
    Zhang, Yaoyuan
    Wang, Hu
    Zhou, Yawen
    Zou, Yueqi
    [J]. 2020 IEEE INTL SYMP ON PARALLEL & DISTRIBUTED PROCESSING WITH APPLICATIONS, INTL CONF ON BIG DATA & CLOUD COMPUTING, INTL SYMP SOCIAL COMPUTING & NETWORKING, INTL CONF ON SUSTAINABLE COMPUTING & COMMUNICATIONS (ISPA/BDCLOUD/SOCIALCOM/SUSTAINCOM 2020), 2020, : 1495 - 1500
  • [29] SOCIAL DYNAMICS AND PUBLIC OPINION
    Odegard, Peter H.
    [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1939, 3 (02) : 239 - 250
  • [30] Social opinion dynamics is not chaotic
    Lim, Chjan
    Zhang, Weituo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS B, 2016, 30 (15):