Dual source CT angiography of carotid stenoses in comparison to MR angiography and duplex sonography [Dual-Source CT-Angiographie von Karotisstenosen im Vergleich zu MR-Angiographie und Duplexsonographie]

被引:0
|
作者
Das M. [1 ]
Mühlenbruch G. [1 ]
Mahnken A.H. [1 ]
Krings T. [2 ]
Langer S. [3 ]
Schaaf M. [2 ]
Harrer-Haag J. [4 ]
Günther R.W. [1 ]
Jacobs M.J. [3 ]
Mommertz G. [5 ]
机构
[1] Klinik für Radiologische Diagnostik, RWTH Aachen, Aachen
[2] Klinik für Neuroradiologie, RWTH Aachen, Aachen
[3] Europäisches Gefäzentrum Aachen-Maastricht, RWTH Aachen - AZ Maastricht, AZ Maastricht
[4] Klinik für Neurologie, RWTH Aachen, Aachen
[5] Klinik für Gefäßchirurgie, Helios-Klinikum Siegburg, 53721 Siegburg
关键词
Carotid artery stenosis; Dual source CT; Duplex ultrasound; MRA;
D O I
10.1007/s00772-009-0743-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of dual source CT angiography of the carotid artery in comparison with MR angiography and color-coded duplex ultrasound (US). Material and methods: From 15 symptomatic patients 30 carotid arteries were evaluated for the degree of stenosis following the NASCET criteria for angiography and the DEGUM criteria for sonography. Each patient was examined using duplex ultrasound, 3T MR angiography and contrast-enhanced dual source CT angiography (DSCT) (tube A 140 kV, 55 mA, tube B 80 kV, 230 mA; 64×0.6 mm coll, pitch 0.65 rot. 0.33 s) of the extracranial carotid artery. Images were reconstructed in 1 mm section thickness and direct bone removal was performed for optimal visualization after the scan. All dual source CT and MR angiography images were evaluated and measured by the same experienced radiologist and all duplex ultrasound results by the same neurologist. Measurement results were compared and correlated. Results: The mean degree of stenosis was 48% by CT (SD 35%), 49% by MR (SD 38%) and 47% by US (SD 41%). There was no statistically significant difference in stenosis evaluation between CT and MR (p=0.83) or between CT and US (p=0.75). The correlation coefficient between CT and MR was r=0.8327, between CT and US r=0.8424 and between US and MR r=0.8260. Conclusion: Dual source CT evaluation of the carotid arteries allows a reliable measurement of carotid artery stenosis. Results are comparable to MR angiography and US. © 2009 Springer Medizin Verlag.
引用
收藏
页码:500 / 504
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dual source CT angiography of carotid stenoses in comparison to MR angiography and duplex sonography
    Das, M.
    Muehlenbruch, G.
    Mahnken, A. H.
    Krings, T.
    Langer, S.
    Schaaf, M.
    Harrer-Haag, J.
    Guenther, R. W.
    Jacobs, M. J.
    Mommertz, G.
    [J]. GEFASSCHIRURGIE, 2009, 14 (06): : 500 - 504
  • [2] Postprocessing algorithms in CT and MR angiography of the aorta [Rekonstruktionsverfahren bei der nachverarbeitung von CT- und MR-angiographie der aorta]
    Huber A.
    Matzko M.
    Wintersperger B.J.
    Reiser M.
    [J]. Der Radiologe, 2001, 41 (8): : 689 - 694
  • [3] Wertigkeit der CT- und MR-Angiographie zur Diagnostik intrakranieller AneurysmenValue of CT and MR angiography for diagnostics of intracranial aneurysms
    C. Roth
    [J]. Der Radiologe, 2011, 51 (2): : 106 - 112
  • [4] Comparison of dual-source CT angiography and MR angiography in preoperative evaluation of intra- and extracranial vessels: a pilot study
    Muehlenbruch, Georg
    Das, Marco
    Mommertz, Gottfried
    Schaaf, Meike
    Langer, Stefan
    Mahnken, Andreas Horst
    Wildberger, Joachim Ernst
    Thron, A.
    Guenther, Rolf W.
    Krings, Timo
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (02) : 469 - 476
  • [5] Comparison of dual-source CT angiography and MR angiography in preoperative evaluation of intra- and extracranial vessels: a pilot study
    Georg Mühlenbruch
    Marco Das
    Gottfried Mommertz
    Meike Schaaf
    Stefan Langer
    Andreas Horst Mahnken
    Joachim Ernst Wildberger
    A. Thron
    Rolf W. Günther
    Timo Krings
    [J]. European Radiology, 2010, 20 : 469 - 476
  • [6] Die nichtinvasive Quantifizierung der Karotisstenose: CT-, MR-Angiographie oder Ultraschall?Non-invasive quantification of carotid stenosis: CT-, MR angiography or ultrasound?
    G. Schulte-Altedorneburg
    [J]. Der Radiologe, 2007, 47 (11): : 960 - 961
  • [7] Comparison of myocardial bridging by dual-source CT with conventional coronary angiography
    Lu, Guang-Ming
    Zhang, Long-Jiang
    Guo, Hua
    Huang, Wei
    Merges, Reto D.
    [J]. CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2008, 72 (07) : 1079 - 1085
  • [8] CT ANGIOGRAPHY IN CAROTID STENOSES - DIAGNOSTIC-VALUE COMPARED WITH COLOR-CODED DUPLEX SONOGRAPHY AND MR-ANGIOGRAPHY
    STEGER, W
    VOGL, TJ
    RAUSCH, M
    PEGIOS, W
    SCHEDEL, H
    HEINZINGER, K
    [J]. FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIETE DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER NEUEN BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 1995, 162 (05): : 373 - 380
  • [9] Dual-source CT coronary angiography in patients with atrial fibrillation: Comparison with single-source CT
    Wang, Yining
    Zhang, Zhuhua
    Kong, Lingyan
    Song, Lan
    Merges, Reto D.
    Chen, Jiuhong
    Jin, Zhengyu
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2008, 68 (03) : 434 - 441
  • [10] Letter to the Editor regarding: Comparison of dual-source CT angiography and MR angiography in preoperative evaluation of intra- and extracranial vessels: a pilot study
    Piero Montorsi
    Giovanni Ballerini
    Andrea Annoni
    Alberto Formenti
    Daniele Andreini
    [J]. European Radiology, 2010, 20 : 2200 - 2201