Accuracy assessment of land cover/land use classifiers in dry and humid areas of Iran

被引:0
|
作者
Saleh Yousefi
Reza Khatami
Giorgos Mountrakis
Somayeh Mirzaee
Hamid Reza Pourghasemi
Mehdi Tazeh
机构
[1] Tarbiat Modares University (TMU),Watershed Science Department, Faculty of Natural Resources
[2] State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry,Department of Environmental Resources Engineering
[3] Lorestan University,College of Natural Resources
[4] Shiraz University,Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Engineering, College of Agriculture
[5] Ardekan University,College of Natural Resources
来源
关键词
Humid and dry areas; Classification accuracy; SVM; Neural networks; Land cover/land use;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Land cover/land use (LCLU) maps are essential inputs for environmental analysis. Remote sensing provides an opportunity to construct LCLU maps of large geographic areas in a timely fashion. Knowing the most accurate classification method to produce LCLU maps based on site characteristics is necessary for the environment managers. The aim of this research is to examine the performance of various classification algorithms for LCLU mapping in dry and humid climates (from June to August). Testing is performed in three case studies from each of the two climates in Iran. The reference dataset of each image was randomly selected from the entire images and was randomly divided into training and validation set. Training sets included 400 pixels, and validation sets included 200 pixels of each LCLU. Results indicate that the support vector machine (SVM) and neural network methods can achieve higher overall accuracy (86.7 and 86.6 %) than other examined algorithms, with a slight advantage for the SVM. Dry areas exhibit higher classification difficulty as man-made features often have overlapping spectral responses to soil. A further observation is that spatial segregation and lower mixture of LCLU classes can increase classification overall accuracy.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Accuracy assessment of land cover/land use classifiers in dry and humid areas of Iran
    Yousefi, Saleh
    Khatami, Reza
    Mountrakis, Giorgos
    Mirzaee, Somayeh
    Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza
    Tazeh, Mehdi
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2015, 187 (10)
  • [2] Geometric Accuracy Assessment of Classified Land Use/Land Cover Changes
    Moeller, Markus
    Birger, Jens
    Glaesser, Cornelia
    [J]. PHOTOGRAMMETRIE FERNERKUNDUNG GEOINFORMATION, 2014, (02): : 91 - 100
  • [3] Simulation and impact assessment of future land use and land cover changes in two protected areas in Tehran, Iran
    Sobhani, Parvaneh
    Esmaeilzadeh, Hassan
    Mostafavi, Hossein
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2021, 75
  • [4] A review on change detection method and accuracy assessment for land use land cover
    Chughtai, Ali Hassan
    Abbasi, Habibullah
    Karas, Ismail Rakip
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING APPLICATIONS-SOCIETY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 22
  • [5] Land use land cover modeling using optimized machine learning classifiers: a case study of Shiraz, Iran
    Ali Jamali
    [J]. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2021, 7 : 1539 - 1550
  • [6] Land use land cover modeling using optimized machine learning classifiers: a case study of Shiraz, Iran
    Jamali, Ali
    [J]. MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 7 (03) : 1539 - 1550
  • [7] Accuracy assessment and validation of a land use-land cover database in Arezzo (Italy)
    Napolitano, P
    Carbonetti, G
    Gallego, J
    [J]. ACCURACY 2000, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 509 - 512
  • [8] Land use land cover mapping using advanced machine learning classifiers: A case study of Shiraz city, Iran
    Jamali, Ali
    [J]. EARTH SCIENCE INFORMATICS, 2020, 13 (04) : 1015 - 1030
  • [9] Land use land cover mapping using advanced machine learning classifiers: A case study of Shiraz city, Iran
    Ali Jamali
    [J]. Earth Science Informatics, 2020, 13 : 1015 - 1030
  • [10] ASSESSMENT OF THE THEMATIC ACCURACY OF LAND COVER MAPS
    Hohle, J.
    [J]. ISPRS GEOSPATIAL WEEK 2015, 2015, II-3 (W5): : 187 - 194