A randomized phase II study of stem cell mobilization with cyclophosphamide+G-CSF or G-CSF alone after lenalidomide-based induction in multiple myeloma

被引:0
|
作者
R Silvennoinen
P Anttila
M Säily
T Lundan
J Heiskanen
T M Siitonen
S Kakko
M Putkonen
H Ollikainen
V Terävä
A Kutila
K Launonen
A Räsänen
A Sikiö
M Suominen
P Bazia
K Kananen
T Selander
T Kuittinen
K Remes
E Jantunen
机构
[1] Kuopio University Hospital,Department of Medicine
[2] Cancer Center,Department of Clinical Chemistry and TYKSLAB
[3] Helsinki University Central Hospital,Department of Medicine
[4] Hematology-Oncology Unit,Department of Medicine
[5] Oulu University Hospital,Department of Medicine
[6] University of Turku and Turku University Central Hospital,Department of Medicine
[7] Hematology Unit,Department of Medicine
[8] Turku University Central Hospital,Department of Medicine
[9] Satakunta Central Hospital,Department of Medicine
[10] Hematology Unit,Department of Clinical Hematology
[11] Tampere University Hospital,undefined
[12] Mikkeli Central Hospital,undefined
[13] Länsi-Pohja Central Hospital,undefined
[14] Kymenlaakso Central Hospital,undefined
[15] Central Finland Central Hospital,undefined
[16] Kanta-Häme Central Hospital,undefined
[17] Kainuu Central Hospital,undefined
[18] Science Services Center,undefined
[19] Kuopio University Hospital,undefined
[20] University of Turku,undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The most common means of mobilizing autologous stem cells is G-CSF alone or combined with cyclophosphamide (CY) to obtain sufficient CD34+ cells for one to two transplants. There are few prospective, randomized studies investigating mobilization regimens in multiple myeloma (MM), especially after lenalidomide-based induction. We designed this prospective, randomized study to compare low-dose CY 2 g/m2+G-CSF (arm A) and G-CSF alone (arm B) after lenalidomide-based up-front induction in MM. Of the 80 initially randomized patients, 69 patients were evaluable, 34 and 35 patients in arms A and B, respectively. The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving a yield of ⩾3 × 106/kg CD34+ cells with 1−2 aphereses, which was achieved in 94% and 77% in arms A and B, respectively (P=0.084). The median number of aphereses needed to reach the yield of ⩾3 × 106/kg was lower in arm A than in arm B (1 vs 2, P=0.035). Two patients needed plerixafor in arm A and five patients in arm B (P=0.428). Although CY-based mobilization was more effective, G-CSF alone was successful in a great majority of patients to reach the defined collection target after three cycles of lenalidomide-based induction.
引用
收藏
页码:372 / 376
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of the efficiency, safety, and survival outcomes in two stem cell mobilization regimens with cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF or G-CSF alone in multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis
    Wang, Liwen
    Xiang, Hongxian
    Yan, Yuhan
    Deng, Zuqun
    Li, Hui
    Li, Xin
    Liu, Jin
    ANNALS OF HEMATOLOGY, 2021, 100 (02) : 563 - 573
  • [22] Leukapheresis products (LP) in multiple myeloma: Lower tumor load after mobilization with cyclophosphamide (CY) plus G-CSF compared to G-CSF alone.
    Cremer, FW
    Kiel, K
    Wallmeier, M
    Haas, R
    Goldschmidt, H
    Moos, M
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 1998, 21 : S208 - S208
  • [23] RESPONSE TO INDUCTION TREATMENT ADAPTED SELECTION OF MOBILIZATION REGIMEN IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA: THE G-CSF ALONE VERSUS HIGH-DOSE CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE PLUS G-CSF REGIMEN
    Lee, J. Y.
    Kim, S. J.
    Jang, J. E.
    Suh, C.
    Lee, H.
    Yhim, H. Y.
    Lee, W. S.
    Min, C. K.
    Lee, J. H.
    Kim, J. S.
    HAEMATOLOGICA, 2014, 99 : 647 - 648
  • [24] High-Dose Cyclophosphamide In Combination With G-CSF Versus G-CSF Alone For Mobilization Of Hematopoietic Stem Cells After Induction Therapy Including Velcade, Cyclophosphamide and Dexacort
    Benyamini, Noam
    Avivi, Irit
    Dann, Eldad J.
    Zuckerman, Tsila
    Noa, Lavi
    Katz, Tami
    BLOOD, 2013, 122 (21)
  • [25] RESPONSE TO INDUCTION TREATMENT ADAPTED SELECTION OF MOBILIZATION REGIMEN IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA: THE G-CSF ALONE VERSUS HIGH-DOSE CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE PLUS G-CSF REGIMEN
    Jungyeon, L.
    Jeong, K. Soo
    Eun, J. Ji
    Chelwon, S.
    Hyewon, L.
    Ho-Young, Y.
    Sik, L. Won
    Chang-Ki, M.
    Hoon, L. Jae
    Seok, K. Jin
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 49 : S525 - S526
  • [26] COMPARISON OF HIGH-DOSE CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE PLUS G-CSF WITH G-CSF ALONE FOR PERIPHERAL BLOOD STEM CELL MOBILIZATION IN MM
    Jang, J. E.
    Hyun, S. Y.
    Hwang, D. Y.
    Yoon, S. H.
    Kim, Y. D.
    Kim, S. J.
    Kim, J. S.
    Cheong, J. -W.
    Min, Y. H.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2012, 23 : 83 - 83
  • [27] A Comparison of Chemotherapy plus G-CSF Versus Plerixafor (Mazobil®) plus G-CSF for Stem Cell Mobilization In Patients with Multiple Myeloma Treated with Lenalidomide.
    Mark, Tomer M.
    Rossi, Adriana C.
    Pearse, Roger N.
    Coleman, Morton
    Bernstein, David
    Zafar, Faiza
    Dergis, Usama
    Shore, Tsiporah B.
    Niesvizky, Ruben
    BLOOD, 2010, 116 (21) : 928 - 929
  • [28] Correction to: Comparison of the efficiency, safety, and survival outcomes in two stem cell mobilization regimens with cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF or G-CSF alone in multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis
    Liwen Wang
    Hongxian Xiang
    Yuhan Yan
    Zuqun Deng
    Hui Li
    Xin Li
    Jing Liu
    Annals of Hematology, 2021, 100 : 575 - 575
  • [29] Higher efficacy of intermediate dose cytarabine plus G-CSF compared to cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF in hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma
    Bogucka-Fedorczuk, Aleksandra
    Czyz, Anna
    Kalicinska, Elzbieta
    Sawicki, Mateusz
    Laszkowska-Lewko, Magdalena
    Wicherska-Pawlowska, Katarzyna
    Rybka, Justyna
    Szeremet, Agnieszka
    Prajs, Iwona
    Szymczak, Donata
    Wrobel, Tomasz
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL APHERESIS, 2020, 35 (04) : 246 - 254
  • [30] G-CSF Plus Preemptive Plerixafor Versus Cyclophosphamide Plus G-CSF for Autologous Stem Cell Mobilization in Multiple Myeloma: Effectiveness, Safety and Cost Analysis
    Antar, Ahmad
    Otrock, Zaher
    Kharfan-Dabaja, Mohamed
    Abou Ghaddara, Hussein
    Kreidieh, Nabila
    Mahfouz, Rami
    Bazarbachi, Ali
    BLOOD, 2014, 124 (21)