Incremental cost‐effectiveness of double‐reading mammograms

被引：0
|
作者：
Tiina Leivo
Tiina Salminen
Harri Sintonen
Risto Tuominen
Kalevi Auerma
Kaarina Partanen
Urpo Saari
Matti Hakama
Olli‐Pertti Heinonen
机构：
[1] University of Helsinki,Department of Public Health
[2] University of Tampere,School of Public Health
[3] University of Kuopio,Department of Health Policy and Management
[4] Cancer Society of Finland,undefined
[5] North Savo Outpatient Clinic of Cancer Society of Finland,undefined
[6] Cancer Society of the Central Finland,undefined
[7] Finnish Cancer Registry,undefined
来源：
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | 1999年 / 54卷
关键词：
breast cancer screening; cost‐effectiveness; double reading; mammography screening;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Background. Double reading is a widely used criterion standard in breast cancer screening despite a lack of evidence of the cost‐effectiveness of the second reading. This study evaluates the incremental cost‐effectiveness of such a strategy.
引用
收藏
页码：261 / 267
页数：6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Computer-aided interpretation of masses in mammograms in comparison to independent double reading
    Karssemeijer, N
    Otten, H
    Verbeek, AL
    Hendriks, JH
    Holland, R
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 472 - 472
  • [32] The more eyes, the better to see? From double to quadruple reading of screening mammograms
    Elmore, Joann G.
    Brenner, R. James
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2007, 99 (15) : 1141 - 1143
  • [33] Consensus approach to discrepancies arising from independent double reading of screening mammograms
    R Hiscock
    G Hurst
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research, 10
  • [34] How do radiographers compare to radiologists when double reading screening mammograms
    J Inglis
    J Curtis
    C Eve
    G Wivell
    E Denton
    G Hurst
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research, 2 (Suppl 2)
  • [35] A framework to assess the cost effectiveness of predictive biomarkers in oncology: Test Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (TICER)
    Safonov, Anton
    Shi, Weiwei
    Platt, James
    Aktas, Bilge
    Kurita, Tomoko
    Pusztai, Lajos
    Hatzis, Christos
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)
  • [36] On estimating medical cost and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios with censored data
    Zhao, HW
    Tian, LL
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2001, 57 (04) : 1002 - 1008
  • [37] Incremental Net Benefit and Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio of COVID-19 Vaccination Campaigns: Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Evidence
    Santoli, Giuseppe
    Nurchis, Mario Cesare
    Calabro, Giovanna Elisa
    Damiani, Gianfranco
    [J]. VACCINES, 2023, 11 (02)
  • [38] Modeling Radiologists' Assessments to Explore Pairing Strategies for Optimized Double Reading of Screening Mammograms
    Gommers, Jessie J. J.
    Abbey, Craig K.
    Strand, Fredrik
    Taylor-Phillips, Sian
    Jenkinson, David J.
    Larsen, Marthe
    Hofvind, Solveig
    Broeders, Mireille J. M.
    Sechopoulos, Ioannis
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2024,
  • [39] Impact of the second reader on screening outcome at blinded double reading of digital screening mammograms
    Coolen, Angela M. P.
    Voogd, Adri C.
    Strobbe, Luc J.
    Louwman, Marieke W. J.
    Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne C. G.
    Duijm, Lucien E. M.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 119 (04) : 503 - 507
  • [40] Problems with interval estimates of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio
    Heitjan, DF
    Moskowitz, AJ
    Whang, W
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1999, 19 (01) : 9 - 15
12345