Enterobacteriaceae and Salmonella contamination of wild boar (Sus scrofa) carcasses: comparison between different sampling strategies

被引:0
|
作者
Silvia Bonardi
Cesare Tansini
Antonio Cacchioli
Laura Soliani
Luca Poli
Luca Lamperti
Margherita Corradi
Stefano Gilioli
机构
[1] University of Parma,Department of Veterinary Science
[2] Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Della Lombardia E Dell’Emilia-Romagna,Risk Analysis and Genomic Epidemiology Unit
[3] Management Body for Parks and Biodiversity “Emilia Occidentale”,undefined
来源
关键词
Wild boar; Game-handling establishment; Enterobacteriaceae;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
During 2020, a total of 64 wild boar carcasses were tested for Enterobacteriaceae count (EBC), Salmonella and Yersinia enterocolitica in the abdominal region (i) within 5 h after hunting in the game collection point and (ii) before dressing and processing in the game-handling establishment (GHE) (49 carcasses—average time interval between (i) and (ii): 4.3 days). Because of COVID-19 restrictions, 15 carcasses were transported to a near slaughterhouse (average time interval between (i) and (ii): 2.3 days). Mesenteric lymph nodes (MLNs) were collected and tested for Salmonella and Y. enterocolitica. Results are shown in relation to sampling A (49 carcasses—GHE) and sampling B (15 carcasses—slaughterhouse). Sampling A: EBC median values were (i) 2.51 log10 CFU/cm2 and (ii) 2.79 log10 CFU/cm2. EBC increase between (i) and (ii) was statistically significant (p = 0.001). Salmonella prevalence on carcasses varied from (i) 2.0 to (ii) 6.1%. Sampling B: EBC median values were (i) 3.1 log10 CFU/cm2 and (ii) 3.32 log10 CFU/cm2. EBC increase between (i) and (ii) was not statistically significant (p = 0.191). Salmonella prevalence on carcasses varied from (i) 6.7 to (ii) 0.0%. The prevalence (sampling A + B) of lymphatic Salmonella carriers was 7.8% (5/64). From carcasses and/or MNLs, the serovars Enteritidis, Typhimurium, Agama, Zaiman and Diarizonae O:50 (z) were detected. Y. enterocolitica was never isolated. Long chilling periods prior to wild game processing should be avoided, and carcasses should be tested at GHE rather than after shooting to proper reflect the microbial load of wild boar meat entering the food chain.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Annual and seasonal space use of different age classes of female wild boar Sus scrofa L.
    Keuling, Oliver
    Stier, Norman
    Roth, Mechthild
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2008, 54 (03) : 403 - 412
  • [32] The winter preferences for different forest habitats by wild boar Sus scrofa estimated using the track counting method
    Orlowska, Lidia
    Nasiadka, Pawel
    [J]. SYLWAN, 2022, 166 (08): : 500 - 511
  • [33] Annual and seasonal space use of different age classes of female wild boar Sus scrofa L.
    Oliver Keuling
    Norman Stier
    Mechthild Roth
    [J]. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 2008, 54 : 403 - 412
  • [34] A Comparison of the Prevalence of Gastrointestinal Parasites in Wild Boar (Sus scrofa L.) Foraging in Urban and Suburban Areas
    Pilarczyk, Bogumila
    Tomza-Marciniak, Agnieszka
    Pilarczyk, Renata
    Felska-Blaszczyk, Lidia
    Bakowska, Malgorzata
    Udala, Jan
    Juszczak-Czasnojc, Marta
    [J]. ANIMALS, 2024, 14 (03):
  • [35] Nocturnal line transect sampling of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in a Mediterranean forest: long-term comparison with capture–mark–resight population estimates
    Barbara Franzetti
    Francesca Ronchi
    Francesca Marini
    Marianne Scacco
    Roberta Calmanti
    Alessandro Calabrese
    Aragno Paola
    Montanaro Paolo
    Stefano Focardi
    [J]. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 2012, 58 : 385 - 402
  • [36] Effect of Cattle on Salmonella Carriage, Diversity and Antimicrobial Resistance in Free-Ranging Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) in Northeastern Spain
    Navarro-Gonzalez, Nora
    Mentaberre, Gregorio
    Porrero, Concepcion M.
    Serrano, Emmanuel
    Mateos, Ana
    Lopez-Martin, Jose M.
    Lavin, Santiago
    Dominguez, Lucas
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (12):
  • [37] Exploring the potential links between gut microbiota composition and natural populations management in wild boar (Sus scrofa)
    Vedel, Giovanni
    Triado-Margarit, Xavier
    Linares, Olmo
    Moreno-Rojas, Jose Manuel
    Pena, Eva de la
    Garcia-Bocanegra, Ignacio
    Jimenez-Martin, Debora
    Carranza, Juan
    Casamayor, Emilio O.
    [J]. MICROBIOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2023, 274
  • [38] Nocturnal line transect sampling of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in a Mediterranean forest: long-term comparison with capture-mark-resight population estimates
    Franzetti, Barbara
    Ronchi, Francesca
    Marini, Francesca
    Scacco, Marianne
    Calmanti, Roberta
    Calabrese, Alessandro
    Paola, Aragno
    Paolo, Montanaro
    Focardi, Stefano
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2012, 58 (02) : 385 - 402
  • [39] Winter Dietary Analysis Reveals the Foraging Differences of Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) in Different Regions of a Karst Mountainous Area
    Cao, Heqin
    Yang, Xiongwei
    Peng, Caichun
    Wang, Yeying
    Guo, Qunyi
    Su, Haijun
    [J]. ANIMALS, 2023, 13 (04):
  • [40] Characteristics of wild boar (Sus scrofa) habituation to urban areas in the Collserola Natural Park (Barcelona) and comparison with other locations
    Cahill, S.
    Llimona, F.
    Cabaneros, L.
    Calomardo, F.
    [J]. ANIMAL BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2012, 35 (02) : 221 - 233