Enterobacteriaceae and Salmonella contamination of wild boar (Sus scrofa) carcasses: comparison between different sampling strategies

被引:0
|
作者
Silvia Bonardi
Cesare Tansini
Antonio Cacchioli
Laura Soliani
Luca Poli
Luca Lamperti
Margherita Corradi
Stefano Gilioli
机构
[1] University of Parma,Department of Veterinary Science
[2] Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Della Lombardia E Dell’Emilia-Romagna,Risk Analysis and Genomic Epidemiology Unit
[3] Management Body for Parks and Biodiversity “Emilia Occidentale”,undefined
来源
关键词
Wild boar; Game-handling establishment; Enterobacteriaceae;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
During 2020, a total of 64 wild boar carcasses were tested for Enterobacteriaceae count (EBC), Salmonella and Yersinia enterocolitica in the abdominal region (i) within 5 h after hunting in the game collection point and (ii) before dressing and processing in the game-handling establishment (GHE) (49 carcasses—average time interval between (i) and (ii): 4.3 days). Because of COVID-19 restrictions, 15 carcasses were transported to a near slaughterhouse (average time interval between (i) and (ii): 2.3 days). Mesenteric lymph nodes (MLNs) were collected and tested for Salmonella and Y. enterocolitica. Results are shown in relation to sampling A (49 carcasses—GHE) and sampling B (15 carcasses—slaughterhouse). Sampling A: EBC median values were (i) 2.51 log10 CFU/cm2 and (ii) 2.79 log10 CFU/cm2. EBC increase between (i) and (ii) was statistically significant (p = 0.001). Salmonella prevalence on carcasses varied from (i) 2.0 to (ii) 6.1%. Sampling B: EBC median values were (i) 3.1 log10 CFU/cm2 and (ii) 3.32 log10 CFU/cm2. EBC increase between (i) and (ii) was not statistically significant (p = 0.191). Salmonella prevalence on carcasses varied from (i) 6.7 to (ii) 0.0%. The prevalence (sampling A + B) of lymphatic Salmonella carriers was 7.8% (5/64). From carcasses and/or MNLs, the serovars Enteritidis, Typhimurium, Agama, Zaiman and Diarizonae O:50 (z) were detected. Y. enterocolitica was never isolated. Long chilling periods prior to wild game processing should be avoided, and carcasses should be tested at GHE rather than after shooting to proper reflect the microbial load of wild boar meat entering the food chain.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Enterobacteriaceae and Salmonella contamination of wild boar (Sus scrofa) carcasses: comparison between different sampling strategies
    Bonardi, Silvia
    Tansini, Cesare
    Cacchioli, Antonio
    Soliani, Laura
    Poli, Luca
    Lamperti, Luca
    Corradi, Margherita
    Gilioli, Stefano
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2021, 67 (05)
  • [2] Wild boar (Sus scrofa) carcasses as an attraction for scavengers and a potential source for soil contamination with the African swine fever virus
    Tummeleht, Lea
    Hakka, Susanna Suvi Sivia
    Jurison, Margret
    Vilem, Annika
    Nurmoja, Imbi
    Viltrop, Arvo
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2024, 11
  • [3] Case report:: Salmonella choleraesuis as a cause of haematogenous osteomyelitis in a wild boar (Sus scrofa)
    Müller, M
    Weber, A
    Tucher, R
    Naumann, L
    [J]. TIERARZTLICHE UMSCHAU, 2004, 59 (12): : 700 - 702
  • [4] SALMONELLA-CHOLERAE-SUIS IN WILD BOAR (SUS-SCROFA) IN NORTHERN BAVARIA
    WEBER, A
    BROOS, H
    WACHOWITZ, R
    HEIL, G
    SCHULTZERHONHOF, J
    [J]. TIERARZTLICHE UMSCHAU, 1990, 45 (06): : 411 - &
  • [5] Salmonella spp. in wild boar (Sus scrofa): a public and animal health concern
    Vieira-Pinto, Madalena
    Morais, Luisa
    Caleja, Cristina
    Themudo, Patricia
    Aranha, Jose
    Torres, Carmen
    Igrejas, Gilberto
    Poeta, Patricia
    Martins, Conceicao
    [J]. GAME MEAT HYGIENE IN FOCUS: MICROBIOLOGY, EPIDEMIOLOGY, RISK ANALYSIS AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2011, : 131 - 136
  • [6] Reproductive parameters of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in three different parts of Germany
    Friederike Gethöffer
    Gunter Sodeikat
    Klaus Pohlmeyer
    [J]. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 2007, 53 : 287 - 297
  • [7] Reproductive parameters of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in three different parts of Germany
    Gethoeffer, Friederike
    Sodeikat, Gunter
    Pohlmeyer, Klaus
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2007, 53 (04) : 287 - 297
  • [8] Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella in European wild boar (Sus scrofa); Latium Region - Italy
    Zottola, T.
    Montagnaro, S.
    Magnapera, C.
    Sasso, S.
    De Martino, L.
    Bragagnolo, A.
    D'Arnici, L.
    Condoleo, R.
    Pisanelli, G.
    Iovane, G.
    Pagnini, U.
    [J]. COMPARATIVE IMMUNOLOGY MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2013, 36 (02) : 161 - 168
  • [9] Comparison of three indirect methods for density estimation of the wild boar (Sus scrofa) in different habitats in South Korea
    Lee, S. -M.
    Song, E.
    Choi, T. -Y.
    [J]. EUROPEAN ZOOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 91 (01): : 674 - 686
  • [10] Reproductive characteristics of wild boar males (Sus scrofa) under different environmental conditions
    Drimaj, Jakub
    Kamler, Jiri
    Hosek, Martin
    Zeman, Jaroslav
    Plhal, Radim
    Mikulka, Ondrej
    Kudlacek, Tomas
    [J]. ACTA VETERINARIA BRNO, 2019, 88 (04) : 401 - 412