Psychometric Properties of the 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) in Adult Patients with Motor Disabilities

被引:0
|
作者
Marianna Papadopoulou
Sophia Stasi
Daphne Bakalidou
Effie Papageorgiou
Aristi Tsokani
Theodora Bratsi
George Papathanasiou
机构
[1] University of West Attica,Laboratory of Neuromuscular and Cardiovascular Study of Motion, Physiotherapy Department
[2] University of West Attica,Department of Biomedical Sciences
[3] University of West Attica,Department of Physical Therapy
关键词
Motor disability; 12 item-WHODAS 2.0; Psychometric properties; International classification of functioning; Disability and health;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To explore the psychometric properties of the Greek version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0–12 item) in adult patients suffering from motor disabilities. The questionnaire of WHODAS 2.0–12 item was officially translated and cross-culturally adapted into Greek (WHODAS 2.0–12Gr).136 adult patients with motor disabilities included in the present observational study. A reliability study was carried out to explore WHODAS 2.0–12Gr’s internal consistency (Cronbach’s a), repeatability (Pearson’s r) and test retest test-retest reliability between the WHODAS 2.0–12Gr outcomes of day-1 and day-8 [intra-class correlation coefficients with 95% confidence intervals (ICC 95%CI)], and the convergent validity (item-total correlation) of the questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to explore the construct validity of the WHODAS 2.0–12Gr, while the concurrent validity of the questionnaire was testing against the Greek Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey version 1.0 (SF-36v1.0-Gr). Reliability properties: WHODAS 2.0–12Gr Cronbach’s a was 0.814 (p < 0.001), Pearson’s r value was 0.980 (p < 0.001) and ICC (95%CI) was 0.990 (0.985–0.993) (p < 0.001). Validity properties: Pearson’s r values of item-total correlation were ranged from 0.376 to 0.736. EFA extracted a 3-factor model. Regarding concurrent validity, the significant correlations between the WHODAS 2.0–12Gr and the SF36v1.0-Gr ranged from −0.169 to −0.720. WHODAS 2.0–12Gr showed significant high to excellent reliability and significant weak to strong validity properties. Overall, it can be suggested that WHODAS 2.0–12Gr could be a reliable and valid tool for assessing patients with motor disabilities.
引用
收藏
页码:801 / 819
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Psychometric Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0-12-item Version in Persons with Fibromyalgia Syndrome
    Smedema, Susan Miller
    Muller, Veronica
    Yaghmaian, Rana A.
    Umucu, Emre
    Ruiz, Derek
    Chan, Fong
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION, 2016, 82 (03) : 28 - 35
  • [42] Confirmatory factor analysis of 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule in patients with musculoskeletal pain conditions
    Saltychev, Mikhail
    Mattie, Ryan
    McCormick, Zachary
    Laimi, Katri
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2017, 31 (05) : 702 - 709
  • [43] Why sample selection matters in exploratory factor analysis: implications for the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0
    Cadeyrn J. Gaskin
    Sylvie D. Lambert
    Steven J. Bowe
    Liliana Orellana
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17
  • [44] Validity and Reliability of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in Turkish Psychiatry Patients and Healthy Controls
    Kunt, Duygu Aslan
    Dereboy, Ferhan
    TURK PSIKIYATRI DERGISI, 2018, 29 (04) : 147 - 155
  • [45] Diagnostic accuracy of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) to estimate disability after stroke
    dos Santos, Heyriane Martins
    Pereira, Gabriela Santos
    de Oliveira, Leia Cordeiro
    da Silva, Paula Karina
    Lima, Michael Goncalves
    Alexandre de Amorim Feliz, Victor Hugo
    Coelho de Morais Faria, Christina Danielli
    Silva, Soraia Micaela
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2023, 45 (13) : 2169 - 2174
  • [46] Validation of the 36-item and 12-item self-report World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS-II) in individuals with autism spectrum disorder
    Park, Shin Ho
    Demetriou, Eleni A.
    Pepper, Karen L.
    Song, Yun Ju C.
    Thomas, Emma E.
    Hickie, Ian B.
    Glozier, Nick
    Guastella, Adam J.
    AUTISM RESEARCH, 2019, 12 (07) : 1101 - 1111
  • [47] Comparing Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) and World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in schizophrenia
    Gspandl, Scott
    Peirson, Ryan P.
    Nahhas, Ramzi W.
    Skale, Tracey Goodman
    Lehrer, Douglas S.
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2018, 259 : 251 - 253
  • [48] Cross-cultural adaptation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) into Portuguese
    Silveira, Carla
    Parpinelli, Mary Angela
    Pacagnella, Rodolfo Carvalho
    de Camargo, Rodrigo Soares
    Costa, Maria Laura
    Zanardi, Dulce Maria
    Ferreira, Elton Carlos
    Santos, Juliana Paula
    Hanson, Lesley
    Cecatti, Jose Guilherme
    Andreucci, Carla Betina
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2013, 59 (03): : 234 - 240
  • [49] The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) as a measure among elderly population. A review
    Ciamarra, Paola
    Corbi, Graziamaria
    Gimigliano, Francesca
    Feola, Alessandro
    Campobasso, Carlo Pietro
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2024,
  • [50] PREDICTING INSTITUTIONALIZATION AFTER SUBACUTE STROKE REHABILITATION USING THE 12-ITEM WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION DISABILITY ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE
    Tarvonen-schroeder, Sinikka
    Koivisto, Mari
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2023, 55