Control of shock unsteadiness in shock boundary-layer interaction on a compression corner using mechanical vortex generators

被引:0
|
作者
S. B. Verma
C. Manisankar
C. Raju
机构
[1] National Aerospace Laboratories,Council of Scientific and Industrial Research
[2] Experimental Aerodynamic Division,undefined
来源
Shock Waves | 2012年 / 22卷
关键词
Shock wave boundary layer interaction (SWBLI); Compression corner; Flow unsteadiness; Vortex generator; Corrugated separation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
An experimental study was conducted to control the unsteadiness of separation shock in a Mach 2 24° compression ramp-induced interaction using mechanical vortex generators (VG). Control devices in the form of an array of single-row delta-ramps were placed upstream of the interaction region and tested for two streamwise locations with respect to the boundary layer thickness (δ) at the interaction location and height ‘h’ of the delta-ramps, i.e., at 27.5δ or h/δ = 0.65 and at 12.5δ or h/δ = 0.26, respectively. Surface oil study revealed traces of streamwise counter-rotating vortex pairs generated downstream of these devices. Measurements using pressure-sensitive paint also showed a spanwise sinusoidal pattern of wall pressure variation indicating generation of streamwise vortices from these control devices. These vortices, on interaction with the reverse flow in the separation bubble, replaced a well-defined separation line (for no control) by a highly corrugated separation line. In the region of separation, the mean pressure distribution gets modified while the peak rms value in the intermittent region of separation showed significant changes. Additionally, the spanwise spacing ‘s’ of the vertex of the delta ramps seemed to be an important parameter in controlling the peak rms value. A decrease in this spacing, i.e., VG1 with s =  0, significantly reduced the peak rms value (by 50 and 35 %) while an increase in the spacing, i.e., VG2 with s =  1 mm, consistently showed an increase (by 12 and 30 %) in the separation shock unsteadiness relative to no control, irrespective of their placement location (of h/δ = 0.65 and 0.26, respectively).
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 339
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] REDUCTION OF FLUCTUATING PRESSURE LOADS IN SHOCK BOUNDARY-LAYER INTERACTIONS USING VORTEX GENERATORS
    BARTER, JW
    DOLLING, DS
    AIAA JOURNAL, 1995, 33 (10) : 1842 - 1849
  • [22] DETAILS OF A SHOCK-SEPARATED TURBULENT BOUNDARY-LAYER AT A COMPRESSION CORNER
    SETTLES, GS
    VAS, IE
    BOGDONOFF, SM
    AIAA JOURNAL, 1976, 14 (12) : 1709 - 1715
  • [23] Shock/boundary-layer interactions: Possible sources of unsteadiness
    Dussauge, J. -P.
    Piponniau, S.
    JOURNAL OF FLUIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2008, 24 (08) : 1166 - 1175
  • [24] Large-Eddy Simulation of Broadband Unsteadiness in a Shock/Boundary-Layer Interaction
    Aubard, G.
    Gloerfelt, X.
    Robinet, J. -C.
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2013, 51 (10) : 2395 - 2409
  • [25] Shock-wave boundary-layer interaction study on a compression corner using pressure-sensitive paint
    Manisankar, C.
    Verma, S.
    Raju, C.
    International Journal of Aerospace Innovations, 2012, 4 (1-2) : 29 - 40
  • [26] BOUNDARY-LAYER CONTROL BY VORTEX GENERATORS
    LEGENDRE, R
    RECHERCHE AEROSPATIALE, 1966, (111): : 19 - &
  • [27] Simulation of Hypersonic Shock/Turbulent Boundary-Layer Interactions Using Shock-Unsteadiness Model
    Pasha, Amjad A.
    Sinha, Krishnendu
    JOURNAL OF PROPULSION AND POWER, 2012, 28 (01) : 46 - 60
  • [28] Plasma Control of a Turbulent Shock Boundary-Layer Interaction
    Bisek, Nicholas J.
    Rizzetta, Donald P.
    Poggie, Jonathan
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2013, 51 (08) : 1789 - 1804
  • [30] Normal shock/boundary-layer interaction control using aeroelastic mesotlaps
    Hafenrichter, ES
    Lee, Y
    Dutton, JC
    Loth, E
    JOURNAL OF PROPULSION AND POWER, 2003, 19 (03) : 464 - 472