The feasibility of pragmatic influenza vaccine randomized controlled real-world trials in Denmark and England

被引:0
|
作者
Joshua Nealon
Daniel Modin
Rebecca E. Ghosh
Deborah Rudin
Gunnar Gislason
Helen P. Booth
Jens Ulrik Stæhr Jensen
Rachael Williams
Hilary Shepherd
Eleanor Yelland
Helene Bricout
Sandra S. Chaves
Tor Biering-Sørensen
机构
[1] Sanofi Pasteur Medical Evidence Generation,School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine
[2] The University of Hong Kong,Department of Cardiology
[3] Pokfulam, Clinical Practice Research Datalink
[4] Hong Kong Special Administrative Region,Department of Pulmonology
[5] Copenhagen University Hospital—Herlev and Gentofte,Modelling, Epidemiology and Data Science
[6] Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences
[7] Sanofi Pasteur Global Medical Affairs,undefined
[8] Copenhagen University Hospital—Herlev and Gentofte & Department of Biomedical Sciences,undefined
[9] Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences,undefined
[10] University of Copenhagen,undefined
[11] Sanofi Pasteur,undefined
[12] University of Copenhagen,undefined
来源
npj Vaccines | / 7卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We estimated the frequency of non-specific influenza-associated clinical endpoints to inform the feasibility of pragmatic randomized controlled trials (RCT) assessing relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE). Hospitalization rates of respiratory, cardiovascular and diabetic events were estimated from Denmark and England’s electronic databases and stratified by age, comorbidity and influenza vaccination status. We included a seasonal average of 4.5 million Danish and 7.2 million English individuals, 17 and 32% with comorbidities. Annually, approximately 1% of Danish and 0.5% of English individuals were hospitalized for selected events, ~50% of them respiratory. Hospitalization rates were 40–50-fold and 2–10-fold higher in those >50 years and with comorbidities, respectively. Our findings suggest that a pragmatic RCT using non-specific endpoints is feasible. However, for outcomes with rates <2.5%, it would require randomization of ~100,000 participants to have the power to detect a rVE difference of ~13%. Targeting selected groups (older adults, those with comorbidities) where frequency of events is high would improve trial efficiency.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Unit information prior for incorporating real-world evidence into randomized controlled trials
    Zhang, Hengtao
    Yin, Guosheng
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2023, 32 (02) : 229 - 241
  • [12] ARE REAL-WORLD PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS ADEQUATELY REPRESENTED IN RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Ganem, P. K.
    Henegan, J. C.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 70 (02) : 675 - 675
  • [13] Randomized controlled trials and real-world data: differences and similarities to untangle literature data
    Monti, Sara
    Grosso, Vittorio
    Todoerti, Monica
    Caporali, Roberto
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2018, 57 : 54 - 58
  • [14] The Importance of Real-World Evidence in Understanding Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness
    Ferrara, Pietro
    Mantovani, Lorenzo Giovanni
    FARMECONOMIA-HEALTH ECONOMICS AND THERAPEUTIC PATHWAYS, 2022, 23 (01) : 29 - 32
  • [15] Real-world trials to answer real-world questions
    Freemantle, N
    Blonde, L
    Bolinder, B
    Gerber, RA
    Hobbs, FDR
    Martinez, L
    Ross, S
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2005, 23 (08) : 747 - 754
  • [16] Real-world trials to answer real-world questions
    Nick Freemantle
    Lawrence Blonde
    Bjorn Bolinder
    Robert A. Gerber
    F. D. Richard Hobbs
    Luc Martinez
    Stuart Ross
    PharmacoEconomics, 2005, 23 : 747 - 754
  • [17] Combining randomized controlled trials and real world data
    Friede, Tim
    Roever, Christian
    Mathes, Tim
    PRAVENTION UND GESUNDHEITSFORDERUNG, 2023,
  • [18] Glargine-300: An updated literature review on randomized controlled trials and real-world studies
    Ghosh, Sujoy
    Ghosh, Romik
    WORLD JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2020, 11 (04) : 100 - 114
  • [19] Replication of Randomized, Controlled Trials Using Real-World Data: What Could Go Wrong?
    Thompson, David
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2021, 24 (01) : 112 - 115
  • [20] Comparing Randomized Controlled Trials and Real-World Studies in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Pharmacotherapy
    Tashkin, Donald P.
    Amin, Alpesh N.
    Kerwin, Edward M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE, 2020, 15 : 1225 - 1243