Environmentally conscious design by using fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making

被引:0
|
作者
Kuo T.-C. [1 ]
Chang S.-H. [1 ]
Huang S.H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Ming Hsin University of Science and Technology, Hsinchu
[2] Department of Mechanical, Industrial and Nuclear Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati
关键词
Analytical hierarchy process; Environmental conscious design; Fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making;
D O I
10.1007/BF02729093
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Products affect the environment at many points in their life cycles. Once a product moves from the drawing board into the production line, its environmental attributes are largely fixed. Many researchers have focused on developing intelligent systems to provide a variety of design and manufacturing information to help designers make environmentally conscious decisions. However, in the early design stage, not all the information available is precise. A large amount of information, especially those that are based on designer experience, is fuzzy in nature. This paper presents an innovative method, namely green fuzzy design analysis (GFDA), which involves simple and efficient procedures to evaluate product design alternatives based on environmental consideration using fuzzy logic. The hierarchical structure of environmentally conscious design indices was constructed using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP), which include five aspects: (1) energy, (2) recycling, (3) toxicity, (4) cost, and (5) material. After weighting factors for the environmental attributes are determined, the most desirable design alternative can be selected based on the fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making (FMADM) technique. The benefit of using such a technique is to effectively solve the design problem by capturing human expertise. © 2006 Springer-Verlag London Limited.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 425
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making method considering the credibility
    School of Business Administration, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
    [J]. J. Comput. Inf. Syst., 2 (423-432):
  • [22] Research on multi-attribute decision-making for Pythagorean hesitation fuzzy sets
    Guan X.
    Liu Y.
    [J]. Xi Tong Gong Cheng Yu Dian Zi Ji Shu/Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46 (03): : 982 - 991
  • [23] METHOD OF FUZZY MULTI-ATTRIBUTE DECISION-MAKING BASED ON THE DEVIATION MODEL
    Yang Jing
    Qiu Wanhua
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 38TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTERS AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-3, 2008, : 603 - 607
  • [24] Study on Fuzzy Multi-attribute Decision-making Based on Entropy Weight
    Yang Jing
    [J]. 2011 30TH CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE (CCC), 2011, : 2921 - 2924
  • [25] Fuzzy Multi-attribute Decision-making Method with Incomplete Weight Information
    Gong, Yanbing
    Feng, Lanping
    [J]. TENTH WUHAN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-BUSINESS, VOLS I AND II, 2011, : 497 - 502
  • [26] Fuzzy Multi-attribute Decision-making Based on Grey Relation Analysis
    Zhang, Xin-bo
    Lu, Ying
    [J]. 2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION AND MODELING WORKSHOP PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, : 738 - 741
  • [27] Multi-attribute decision-making based on comprehensive hesitant fuzzy entropy
    Xin, Guan
    Ying, Liu
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2024, 237
  • [28] A FUZZY MULTI-ATTRIBUTE DECISION-MAKING METHOD UNDER RISK WITH UNKNOWN ATTRIBUTE WEIGHTS
    Han, Zuosheng
    Liu, Peide
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2011, 17 (02) : 246 - 258
  • [29] Landfill site selection by decision-making tools based on fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making method
    Nazari, Abdolhadi
    Salarirad, Mohammad Mehdi
    Bazzazi, Abbas Aghajani
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2012, 65 (06) : 1631 - 1642
  • [30] Landfill site selection by decision-making tools based on fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making method
    Abdolhadi Nazari
    Mohammad Mehdi Salarirad
    Abbas Aghajani Bazzazi
    [J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2012, 65 : 1631 - 1642