Trends in maternal age distribution and the live birth prevalence of Down’s syndrome in England and Wales: 1938–2010

被引:0
|
作者
Jianhua Wu
Joan K Morris
机构
[1] Centre for Environmental and Preventive Medicine,
[2] Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine,undefined
[3] Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry,undefined
[4] Queen Mary University of London,undefined
来源
关键词
Down’s syndrome; maternal age; live birth prevalence;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
There have been concerns about the effects of increases in maternal age since the 1980s on the prevalence of Down’s syndrome. This study examined changes in the distribution of maternal age in England and Wales from 1938 to 2010. The live birth prevalence of Down’s syndrome in the absence of screening and subsequent termination was estimated using the numbers of babies born in England and Wales according to maternal age and the maternal age-related risk of a birth with Down’s syndrome. The proportion of women age 35 years or older at the time of giving birth reached a peak of 20% in 1945, declined to 5.5% in 1977 and rose to 20% in 2007. In the absence of screening and subsequent termination, the estimated live birth prevalence of Down’s syndrome would have mirrored these changes (2.3 per 1000 births in 1945, 1.2 per 1000 in 1976 and 2.2 per 1000 in 2007). The observed live birth prevalence (recorded by the National Down Syndrome Cytogenetic Register) was1.0 per 1000 from 1989 to 2010, due to screening and subsequent termination. In conclusion since the 1980s there has been an increase in the mean maternal age and in the expected prevalence of Down’s syndrome. When put in a longer historical context the current expected live birth prevalence is similar to that in the 1940s and the observed live birth prevalence is about 54% less than expected, due to screening and subsequent termination, and has remained reasonably constant since 1989 at 1.0 per 1000 births.
引用
收藏
页码:943 / 947
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prenatal screening for Down syndrome in England and Wales and population-based birth outcomes
    Smith-Bindman, R
    Chu, P
    Bacchetti, P
    Waters, JJ
    Mutton, D
    Alberman, E
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (04) : 980 - 985
  • [22] Trends in live birth prevalence of Down syndrome in the Northern Netherlands 1987-96: the impact of screening and prenatal diagnosis
    Wortelboer, MJM
    de Wolf, BTHM
    Verschuuren-Bemelmans, CC
    Reefhuis, J
    Mantingh, A
    Beekhuis, JR
    Cornel, MC
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2000, 20 (09) : 709 - 713
  • [23] Retrospective analysis of live birth prevalence of children with Down syndrome in Denizli, Turkey
    Acikbas, I.
    Tomatir, A. G.
    Akdag, B.
    Koksal, A.
    GENETICS AND MOLECULAR RESEARCH, 2012, 11 (04) : 4640 - 4645
  • [24] Live birth prevalence of Down syndrome in Tottori, Japan,1980-1999
    Takeuchi, Ariko
    Ehara, Hiroaki
    Ohtani, Kyoichi
    Maegaki, Yoshihiro
    Nanba, Yukiko
    Nagata, Ikuo
    Toyoshima, Mitsuo
    Kondo, Akiko
    Nakai, Shoji
    Takeshita, Kenzo
    Ohno, Kousaku
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A, 2008, 146A (11) : 1381 - 1386
  • [25] Estimation of live birth and population prevalence of Down syndrome in nine US states
    de Graaf, Gert
    Buckley, Frank
    Dever, Jennifer
    Skotko, Brian G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A, 2017, 173 (10) : 2710 - 2719
  • [26] Ten-year trends in prevalence of Down syndrome in a developing country: impact of the maternal age and prenatal screening
    Kurtovic-Kozaric, Amina
    Mehinovic, Leila
    Malesevic, Radmila
    Mesanovic, Semir
    Jaros, Tijana
    Stomornjak-Vukadin, Meliha
    Mackic-Djurovic, Mirela
    Ibrulj, Slavica
    Kurtovic-Basic, Ilvana
    Kozaric, Mirza
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2016, 206 : 79 - 83
  • [27] Risk of a Down syndrome live birth in women 45 years of age and older
    Morris, JK
    De Vigan, C
    Mutton, DE
    Alberman, E
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2005, 25 (04) : 275 - 278
  • [28] Maternal Age-Adjusted Birth Prevalence of Down Syndrome Is Lower in States with Higher Levels of Per Capita Income
    Babak Khoshnood
    Stephen N Wall
    Jaideep K Singh
    Hui-Lung Hsieh
    Deepa Ranganathan
    Kwang-sun Lee
    Pediatric Research, 1999, 45 : 104 - 104
  • [29] Maternal age-adjusted birth prevalence of Down syndrome is lower in states with higher levels of per capita income
    Khoshnood, B
    Wall, SN
    Singh, JK
    Hsieh, HL
    Ranganathan, D
    Lee, KS
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 1999, 45 (04) : 104A - 104A
  • [30] Stable estimated live birth prevalence of Down syndrome in the Netherlands, 2000-2013
    Tamminga, S.
    de Groot-van Mooren, M. D.
    Weijerman, M. E.
    Oepkes, D.
    Cornel, M. C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2018, 26 : 136 - 136