ASO Visual Abstract: "Going Flat" After Mastectomy: Patient-Reported Outcomes by Online Survey

被引:0
|
作者
Baker, Jennifer L. [1 ]
Attai, Deanna J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
Wenziger, Cachet M. [4 ]
Streja, Elani [4 ]
Thompson, Carlie K. [1 ]
Lee, Minna K. [1 ]
DiNome, Maggie L. [1 ]
Attai, Deanna J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[2] Brown Univ, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[3] Lifespan Canc Inst, Providence, RI USA
[4] Univ Calif Irvine, Sch Med, Dept Med, Irvine, CA 92717 USA
[5] UCLA Hlth Burbank Breast Care, Burbank, CA 91505 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1245/s10434-021-09769-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The Going Flat movement aims to increase awareness and acceptance of mastectomy alone as a viable option for patients. Little is known about motivations and satisfaction with surgical outcomes in this population. Methods: An online survey was administered to 931 women who had a history of uni- or bilateral mastectomy for treatment of breast cancer or elevated breast cancer risk without current breast mound reconstruction. Satisfaction with outcome and surgeon support for the patient experience were characterized using 5-level scaled scores. Results: Mastectomy alone was the first choice for 73.7% of the respondents. The top two reasons for going flat were desire for a faster recovery and avoidance of a foreign body placement. Overall, the mean scaled satisfaction score was 3.72 ± 1.17 out of 5. In the multivariable analysis, low level of surgeon support for the decision to go flat was the strongest predictor of a satisfaction score lower than 3 (odds ratio [OR], 3.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.59–5.72; p < 0.001). Dissatisfaction also was more likely among respondents reporting a body mass index (BMI) of 30 kg/m2 or higher (OR, 2.74; 95% CI, 1.76–4.27; p < 0.001) and those undergoing a unilateral procedure (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.29–3.09; p = 0.002). Greater satisfaction was associated with receiving adequate information about surgical options (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.32–0.69; p < 0.0001) and having a surgeon with a specialized breast surgery practice (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.38–0.81; p = 0.002). Conclusions: Most patients undergoing mastectomy alone are satisfied with their surgical outcome. Surgeons may optimize patient experience by recognizing and supporting a patient’s decision to go flat. © 2021, Society of Surgical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:2507 / 2507
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ASO Visual Abstract: Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Screening Practices Reported via an Online Survey
    Record, Sydney M.
    Thomas, Samantha M.
    Chanenchuk, Tori A.
    Baker, Jay J.
    Grimm, Lars K.
    Plichta, Jennifer
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (10) : 6230 - 6231
  • [32] ASO Visual Abstract: Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Screening Practices Reported via an Online Survey
    Sydney M. Record
    Samantha M. Thomas
    Jay A. Tori Chanenchuk
    Lars J. Baker
    Jennifer K. Grimm
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2023, 30 : 6230 - 6231
  • [33] ASO Visual Abstract: Does Wound VAC Temporization Offer Similar Patient-Reported Outcomes as Single-Stage Excision Reconstruction After Myxofibrosarcoma Resection?
    Werenski, Joseph O.
    Gonzalez, Marcos R.
    Fourman, Mitchell S.
    Hung, Yin P.
    Lozano-Calderon, Santiago A.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (04) : 2798 - 2798
  • [34] Patient-reported outcome of their breast reconstruction after mastectomy
    Robiolle, C.
    Quillet, A.
    Dagregorio, G.
    Huguier, V.
    ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE PLASTIQUE ESTHETIQUE, 2015, 60 (03): : 201 - 207
  • [35] ASO Author Reflections: Patient-Reported Outcomes—Bench to Bedside
    Srinivas Joga Ivatury
    Sandra L. Wong
    Deborah Schrag
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2020, 27 : 725 - 726
  • [36] Longitudinal Trends in Patient-Reported Outcomes in the First Year After Lumpectomy Versus Mastectomy
    Vemuru, Sudheer
    Helmkamp, Laura
    Adams, Monica
    Colborn, Kathryn
    Parris, Hannah
    Huynh, Victoria
    Higgins, Madeline
    Christian, Nicole
    Ahrendt, Gretchen
    Baurle, Erin
    Lee, Clara
    Kim, Simon
    Matlock, Dan
    Cumbler, Ethan
    Tevis, Sarah
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (11) : 7597 - 7606
  • [37] ASO Visual Abstract: The Impact of Breast-Conserving Surgery Re-excision on Patient-Reported Outcomes Using the BREAST-Q
    Matar-Ujvary, Regina
    Haglich, Kathryn
    Flanagan, Meghan R.
    Fuzesi, Sarah
    Sevilimedu, Varadan
    Nelson, Jonas A.
    Gemignani, Mary L.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (09) : 5350 - 5351
  • [38] ASO Visual Abstract: Frail but Resilient: Frailty in Autologous Breast Reconstruction is Associated with Worse Surgical Outcomes but Equivalent Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes
    Hassan, Abbas M.
    Paidisetty, Praneet
    Ray, Nicholas
    Govande, Janhavi G.
    Nelson, Jonas A.
    Mehrara, Babak J.
    Butler, Charles E.
    Mericli, Alexander F.
    Selber, Jesse C.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (03) : 2045 - 2046
  • [39] ASO Visual Abstract: Frail but Resilient: Frailty in Autologous Breast Reconstruction is Associated with Worse Surgical Outcomes but Equivalent Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes
    Abbas M. Hassan
    Praneet Paidisetty
    Nicholas Ray
    Janhavi G. Govande
    Jonas A. Nelson
    Babak J. Mehrara
    Charles E. Butler
    Alexander F. Mericli
    Jesse C. Selber
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2024, 31 : 2045 - 2046
  • [40] Patient-reported outcomes after urethroplasty
    Jackson, M. J.
    Chaudhury, I.
    Mangera, A.
    Brett, A.
    Watkin, N.
    Chapple, C. R.
    Andrich, D. E.
    Pickard, R. S.
    Mundy, A. R.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 : 47 - 47