Does route of administration affect the outcome of TNF antagonist therapy?

被引:0
|
作者
Sergio Schwartzman
G James Morgan
机构
[1] Hospital for Special Surgery,
[2] Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center,undefined
关键词
adherence; efficacy; intravenous; rheumatoid arthritis; subcutaneous; tumor necrosis factor;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists are parenterally administered biologic response modifiers indicated for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Although infliximab, etanercept, and adalimumab are all members of this class, they differ in route of administration and dosing regimen. In the USA and in Europe, infliximab, in combination with oral methotrexate, is administered intravenously, initially at a dose of 3 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2, and 6, then every 8 weeks thereafter. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has further approved that the dosage can be increased to 10 mg/kg and the doses can be given as often as every 4 weeks to optimize patient outcome (information based on the US package insert dated June 2002). Etanercept and adalimumab are given subcutaneously and can be self-injected. The FDA-approved dose of etanercept is 25 mg twice weekly, and of adalimumab is 40 mg every 2 weeks with methotrexate, or 40 mg alone. Medication adherence, possibly the most important factor in maintaining the benefits of anti-TNF therapy, is influenced by the interaction between the patient and his or her healthcare team, the patient's attitude toward the disease and medication regimen, and the choice of therapy.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Does quality of life affect outcome?
    Bewley J.
    Critical Care, 5 (1):
  • [42] Does β Selectivity Really Affect Outcome?
    Wicker, Jordan Field
    Bronheim, David
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2014, 120 (05) : 1286 - 1287
  • [43] Body mass does not affect the remission of psoriatic arthritis patients on anti-TNF-α therapy
    Iannone, F.
    Fanizzi, R.
    Scioscia, C.
    Anelli, M. G.
    Lapadula, G.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2013, 42 (01) : 41 - 44
  • [44] Route of opioid administration: Does it make a difference?
    Kalso, E
    OPIOID SENSITIVITY OF CHRONIC NONCANCER PAIN, 1999, 14 : 117 - 128
  • [45] Does administration of hydroxychloroquine/amiodarone affect the efficacy of enzyme replacement therapy for Fabry mice?
    Tsukimura, Takahiro
    Saito, Koki
    Shiga, Tomoko
    Ogawa, Yasuhiro
    Sakuraba, Hitoshi
    Togawa, Tadayasu
    MOLECULAR GENETICS AND METABOLISM REPORTS, 2024, 39
  • [46] The route of administration (oral vs intravenous) does not influence dose or outcome in Graves' disease and unifocal autonomy
    Schneider, P
    Biko, J
    Hänscheid, H
    Hilliger, S
    Koutsampelas, C
    Kranzfelder, M
    Ladner, S
    Reiners, C
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2005, 32 (07) : 788 - 793
  • [47] The route of administration (oral vs intravenous) does not influence dose or outcome in Graves’ disease and unifocal autonomy
    Peter Schneider
    Johannes Biko
    Heribert Hänscheid
    Stephan Hilliger
    Christos Koutsampelas
    Michael Kranzfelder
    Stephan Ladner
    Christoph Reiners
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2005, 32 : 788 - 793
  • [48] Route of administration of exogenous progesterone for luteal support does not significantly affect the serum concentration in assisted reproductive technology
    Zhang, Yangyang
    Xu, Yang
    Shang, Jing
    Chen, Fei
    Kuai, Yanrong
    Wang, Sheng
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2021, 25 (06): : 134 - 142
  • [49] Change in estradiol on the day after initiation of the GnRH antagonist Cetrorelix in IVF cycles does not affect pregnancy outcome
    Kiminami, A.
    Yoshida, A.
    Kakinuma, M.
    Tanaka, M.
    Suzuki, H.
    Takahashi, A.
    Seida, K.
    Fujikura, Y.
    Fujimori, T.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2003, 18 : 106 - 106
  • [50] Does IV iron therapy affect outcome after tunneled cuffed catheter bacteremia?
    Golestaneh, L
    Rosenberg, S
    Laut, J
    Mokrzycki, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2004, 43 (04) : A24 - A24