Immunosuppression minimization protocols: how should they be monitored?

被引:0
|
作者
Enver Akalin
机构
[1] E Akalin is an Associate Professor of Medicine,
[2] Medical Director of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation,undefined
[3] and Director of the Transplant Nephrology Fellowship at Mount Sinai School of Medicine,undefined
[4] New York,undefined
[5] NY,undefined
[6] USA.,undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This Practice Point commentary discusses the experience of Shapiro et al. with renal allograft recipients at a single center who underwent significant minimization of immunosuppressive treatment with alemtuzumab induction and tacrolimus monotherapy (weaned to three times weekly by 1 year after transplantation). Donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) against human leukocyte antigen were monitored after transplantation in some patients. Although 44% of patients did not develop acute rejection or DSAs and had excellent 2-year graft survival (96%), spaced weaning was not attempted in 20% of patients, generally those with early rejection and poor allograft function. During tapering, 20% of patients developed acute rejection and 15% developed DSAs. Two-year graft survival was 63% in patients for whom weaning was not attempted and 78% in patients who experienced acute rejection. Alemtuzumab preconditioning with tacrolimus monotherapy and spaced weaning increased the risk of acute rejection and development of DSAs. Patients should be carefully selected for this protocol and monitored closely for DSAs. Results of a long-term controlled trial that includes protocol biopsies are required to reach more-definitive conclusions.
引用
收藏
页码:484 / 485
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] What are the risks of oestrogens in women assigned male at birth and how should they be monitored?
    Hawkins, Jacq
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 358
  • [32] Immunosuppression protocols and renal osteodystrophy
    Arias, M
    Escallada, R
    De Francisco, ALM
    Amado, JA
    Garcia-Unzueta, MT
    Montalban, C
    Rodrigo, E
    Cotorruelo, JG
    Zubimendi, JA
    NEFROLOGIA, 1998, 18 : 54 - 58
  • [33] NEWER CLINICAL PROTOCOLS OF IMMUNOSUPPRESSION
    PAYNE, WD
    SIMMONS, RL
    CANAFAX, DM
    STRAND, M
    ASCHER, NL
    SUTHERLAND, DER
    NAJARIAN, JS
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1985, 17 : 44 - 48
  • [34] IMMUNOSUPPRESSION MINIMIZATION IN LIVER TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS
    Mucha, Krzysztof
    Foroncewicz, Bartosz
    Lerut, Jan
    Moszczuk, Barbara
    Florczak, Michal
    Perkowska, Agnieszka
    Krata, Natalia
    Zagozdzon, Radoslaw
    Urbanowicz, Arkadiusz
    Kniola, Emilia
    Zieniewicz, Krzysztof
    Paczek, Leszek
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 32 : 386 - 387
  • [35] Minimization protocols in pancreas transplantation
    Cantarovich, Diego
    Vistoli, Fabio
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 22 (01) : 61 - 68
  • [36] Minimization of Transplant Immunosuppression: An Elusive Goal
    Lee, Brian K.
    Han, Hwarang S.
    Adler, Joel T.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 108 (01) : 18 - 19
  • [37] Liver allograft fibrosis and minimization of immunosuppression
    Ranganathan, Sarangarajan
    Celik, Neslihan
    Mazariegos, George
    Sindhi, Rakesh
    PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 19 (07) : 667 - 668
  • [38] Should Hotel Housekeepers be Monitored?
    Fisher, Darrell R.
    HEALTH PHYSICS, 2020, 119 (03): : 366 - 366
  • [39] Why should machinery be monitored?
    Matthews, Mary Sue
    Turbomachinery International, 1991, 32 (03)
  • [40] Diagnosis of delayed cerebral ischaemia and vasospasm in subarrachnoid haemorrhage: How long should they be monitored?
    Valencia Calderon, C.
    Gabarros Canals, A.
    Calderon Valdiviezo, A. I.
    NEUROLOGIA, 2011, 26 (06): : 377 - 379