The Domain-Boundary Element Method (DBEM) for hyperelastic and elastoplastic finite deformation: axisymmetric and 2D/3D problems

被引:0
|
作者
O. Köhler
G. Kuhn
机构
[1] University of Erlangen-Nuremberg,
[2] Institute of Applied Mechanics,undefined
[3] Egerlandstr. 5,undefined
[4] D-91058 Erlangen,undefined
[5] Germany E-mail: olaf.koehler@audi.de,undefined
来源
关键词
Keywords Domain-Boundary Element Method; Hyperelasticity; Elastoplasticity; Axisymmetric Problems; Finite Deformation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
 This paper presents the solution of geometrically nonlinear problems in solid mechanics by the Domain-Boundary Element Method. Because of the Total-Lagrange approach, the arising domain and boundary integrals are evaluated in the undeformed configuration. Therefore, the system matrices remain unchanged during the solution procedure, and their time-consuming computation needs to be performed only once. While the integral equations for axisymmetric finite deformation problems will be derived in detail, the basic ideas of the formulation in two and three dimensions can be found in [1]. The present formulation includes torsional problems with finite deformations, where additional terms arise due to the curvilinear coordinate system. A Newton–Raphson scheme is used to solve the nonlinear set of equations. This involves the solution of a large system of linear equations, which has been a very time-consuming task in former implementations, [1, 2]. In this work, an iterative solver, i.e. the generalized minimum residual method, is used within the Newton–Raphson algorithm, which leads to a significant reduction of the computation time. Finally, numerical examples will be given for axisymmetric and two/three-dimensional problems.
引用
收藏
页码:436 / 452
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Error estimation and adaptive mesh generation in the 2D and 3D finite element method
    Technische Universitaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    IEEE Trans Magn, 3 /1 (1334-1337):
  • [42] 2D–3D hybrid stabilized finite element method for tsunami runup simulations
    S. Takase
    S. Moriguchi
    K. Terada
    J. Kato
    T. Kyoya
    K. Kashiyama
    T. Kotani
    Computational Mechanics, 2016, 58 : 411 - 422
  • [43] Comparison between 2d and 3d behavior of sheet piles by finite element method
    Jesmani, Mehrab
    Mehdipour, Iman
    Ajami, Azade
    KUWAIT JOURNAL OF SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2011, 38 (2B): : 1 - 16
  • [44] Use of finite element method for 2D and 3D analyses of tunnelling induced settlements
    Maras-Dragojevic, Snezana
    GRADEVINAR, 2020, 72 (08): : 673 - 680
  • [45] Error estimation and adaptive mesh generation in the 2D and 3D finite element method
    Janicke, L
    Kost, A
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 1996, 32 (03) : 1334 - 1337
  • [46] Thermal Analysis of Power Transformer Using 2D and 3D Finite Element Method
    Seddik, Mohamed S.
    Shazly, Jehan
    Eteiba, Magdy B.
    ENERGIES, 2024, 17 (13)
  • [47] Boundary-only element solutions of 2D and 3D nonlinear and nonhomogeneous elastic problems
    Gao, X. W.
    Zhang, Ch.
    Guo, L.
    ENGINEERING ANALYSIS WITH BOUNDARY ELEMENTS, 2007, 31 (12) : 974 - 982
  • [49] Solutions of 2D and 3D non-homogeneous potential problems by using a boundary element-collocation method
    Qu, Wenzhen
    Chen, Wen
    Fu, Zhuojia
    ENGINEERING ANALYSIS WITH BOUNDARY ELEMENTS, 2015, 60 : 2 - 9
  • [50] Idealizing quasi-axisymmetric 3D geometries to 2D-axisymmetric finite element models
    Casero J.C.
    Robinson T.T.
    Armstrong C.G.
    Geron M.
    Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 2019, 16 (06): : 1020 - 1033