Intra-abdominal pressure: A reliable criterion for laparostomy closure?

被引:0
|
作者
Schachtrupp A. [1 ]
Höer J. [1 ]
Töns C. [1 ]
Klinge U. [1 ]
Reckord U. [1 ]
Schumpelick V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Surgery, Rhenish Westphalian Technical Univ., 52074 Aachen
关键词
Abdomen; Compartment syndromes; Hydrostatic pressure; Laparotomy; Monitoring;
D O I
10.1007/s10029-002-0053-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Laparostomy is frequently performed in the surgical therapy of mechanical obstruction, peritonitis, or trauma to prevent abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). Extended incisional hernia is inevitable when fascial closure is missed (up to 90% of cases). Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) has not yet been evaluated as a criterion for the feasibility of fascial closure. Patients and methods. Over 12 months laparostomy was carried out in 40 patients. Definitive closure of the abdomen was performed after 4.4 ± 3.7 days in 23 of these. Intravesical pressure was used to assess IAP before and after fascial closure. The resulting IAP was compared to the values of 90 patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery. Parameters of cardiocirculatory, renal, pulmonary, and liver function were also recorded. Results. After closure of the laparostomy IAP increased significantly from 6.5 ± 3.3 to 12.0 ± 4.1 mmHg. Urine output decreased by 27% on the first postoperative day but regained normal levels thereafter. The central venous pressure increased by 31%. Other parameters of cardiocirculatory, renal, pulmonary, and liver function were unchanged. No case of ACS occurred. In the patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery IAP ranged from 6.5 ± 2.1 to 10.0 ± 4.0 mmHg. Conclusions. Fascial closure increased the IAP, which was accompanied by short-termed decrease in urine output. At these levels of IAP fascial closure appears to be harmless, but further prospective studies are needed to determine the critical level of IAP for allowing a safe repair of large fascial defects. © Springer-Verlag 2002.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 107
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Integration of inspiratory and expiratory intra-abdominal pressure: a novel concept looking at mean intra-abdominal pressure
    Siavash Ahmadi-Noorbakhsh
    Manu LNG Malbrain
    Annals of Intensive Care, 2
  • [22] INTRAPERITONEAL PRESSURE AND INTRA-ABDOMINAL PRESSURE: ARE THEY THE SAME?
    Al-Hwiesh, Abdullah
    Al-Mueilo, Sameer
    Saeed, Ibrahiem
    Al-Muhanna, Fahd A.
    PERITONEAL DIALYSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 31 (03): : 315 - 319
  • [23] Algorithm for the management of large abdominal wall defects due to laparostomy wounds following intra-abdominal catastrophe
    Choh C.T.P.
    Lieske B.
    Farouk R.
    Waldmann C.
    Uppal R.S.
    European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 2013, 36 (9) : 553 - 558
  • [24] Short- and long-term outcome of laparostomy following intra-abdominal sepsis
    Anderson, O.
    Putnis, A.
    Bhardwaj, R.
    Ho-Asjoe, M.
    Carapeti, E.
    Williams, A. B.
    George, M. L.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2011, 13 (02) : e20 - e32
  • [25] Effect of hemodialysis on intra-abdominal pressure
    Bonfim, Roberta Fernandes
    Goulart, Andreia Grigorio
    Fu, Carolina
    Torquato, Jamili Anbar
    CLINICS, 2007, 62 (02) : 145 - 150
  • [26] Continuous intra-abdominal pressure monitoring
    Balogh, Z.
    De Waele, J. J.
    Malbrain, M. L. N. G.
    ACTA CLINICA BELGICA, 2007, 62 : 26 - 32
  • [27] OLIGURIA AND INCREASED INTRA-ABDOMINAL PRESSURE
    GEHRIG, JJ
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1985, 253 (01): : 39 - 39
  • [28] INTRA-ABDOMINAL PRESSURE AND LUMBOSACRAL PAIN
    不详
    LANCET, 1962, 2 (7268): : 1263 - +
  • [29] The mechanism of the regulation of intra-abdominal pressure
    Coombs, HC
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1922, 61 (01): : 159 - 170
  • [30] Intra-abdominal pressure in the morbidly obese
    Lambert, DM
    Marceau, S
    Forse, RA
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2005, 15 (09) : 1225 - 1232