Intra-abdominal pressure: A reliable criterion for laparostomy closure?

被引:0
|
作者
Schachtrupp A. [1 ]
Höer J. [1 ]
Töns C. [1 ]
Klinge U. [1 ]
Reckord U. [1 ]
Schumpelick V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Surgery, Rhenish Westphalian Technical Univ., 52074 Aachen
关键词
Abdomen; Compartment syndromes; Hydrostatic pressure; Laparotomy; Monitoring;
D O I
10.1007/s10029-002-0053-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Laparostomy is frequently performed in the surgical therapy of mechanical obstruction, peritonitis, or trauma to prevent abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). Extended incisional hernia is inevitable when fascial closure is missed (up to 90% of cases). Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) has not yet been evaluated as a criterion for the feasibility of fascial closure. Patients and methods. Over 12 months laparostomy was carried out in 40 patients. Definitive closure of the abdomen was performed after 4.4 ± 3.7 days in 23 of these. Intravesical pressure was used to assess IAP before and after fascial closure. The resulting IAP was compared to the values of 90 patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery. Parameters of cardiocirculatory, renal, pulmonary, and liver function were also recorded. Results. After closure of the laparostomy IAP increased significantly from 6.5 ± 3.3 to 12.0 ± 4.1 mmHg. Urine output decreased by 27% on the first postoperative day but regained normal levels thereafter. The central venous pressure increased by 31%. Other parameters of cardiocirculatory, renal, pulmonary, and liver function were unchanged. No case of ACS occurred. In the patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery IAP ranged from 6.5 ± 2.1 to 10.0 ± 4.0 mmHg. Conclusions. Fascial closure increased the IAP, which was accompanied by short-termed decrease in urine output. At these levels of IAP fascial closure appears to be harmless, but further prospective studies are needed to determine the critical level of IAP for allowing a safe repair of large fascial defects. © Springer-Verlag 2002.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 107
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Vacuum-assisted closure of laparostomy, an efficient strategy for complicated intra-abdominal infection
    NG Germano
    IG Gonçalves
    B Moya
    R Ribeiro
    [J]. Critical Care, 14 (Suppl 1):
  • [2] THE MEASUREMENT OF INTRA-ABDOMINAL PRESSURE AS A CRITERION FOR ABDOMINAL RE-EXPLORATION
    KRON, IL
    HARMAN, PK
    NOLAN, SP
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1984, 199 (01) : 28 - 30
  • [4] Laparostomy for severe intra-abdominal infection complicating colorectal disease
    Bailey, CMH
    Thompson-Fawcett, MW
    Kettlewell, MGW
    Garrard, C
    Mortensen, NJM
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2000, 43 (01) : 25 - 30
  • [5] INTRA-ABDOMINAL PRESSURE
    LIGHT, HG
    ROUTLEDGE, JA
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1965, 90 (01) : 115 - +
  • [6] INTRA-ABDOMINAL PRESSURE
    ASPDEN, R
    [J]. CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1988, 3 (01) : 48 - 48
  • [7] Intra-abdominal Pressure Monitoring in Open Abdomen Management with Dynamic Abdominal Closure
    A. Ebru Sarer
    Fahri Yetisir
    Muhittin Aygar
    Hasan Zafer Acar
    Yılmaz Polat
    Gokhan Osmanoglu
    [J]. Indian Journal of Surgery, 2017, 79 : 384 - 389
  • [8] Intra-abdominal Pressure Monitoring in Open Abdomen Management with Dynamic Abdominal Closure
    Sarer, A. Ebru
    Yetisir, Fahri
    Aygar, Muhittin
    Acar, Hasan Zafer
    Polat, Yilmaz
    Osmanoglu, Gokhan
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 79 (05) : 384 - 389
  • [9] Intra-abdominal pressure measurement: validation of intragastric pressure as a measure of intra-abdominal pressure
    Turnbull, D.
    Webber, S.
    Hamnegard, C. H.
    Mills, G. H.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2007, 98 (05) : 628 - 634
  • [10] Intra-abdominal pressure, intra-abdominal hypertension, and pregnancy: a review
    Rosaleen Chun
    Andrew W Kirkpatrick
    [J]. Annals of Intensive Care, 2