CRISPR-Cas Technology in Plant Science

被引:0
|
作者
Peter M. Rogowsky
机构
[1] Univ Lyon,Laboratoire Reproduction et Développement des Plantes
[2] ENS de Lyon,undefined
[3] UCB Lyon 1,undefined
[4] CNRS,undefined
[5] INRA,undefined
来源
Potato Research | 2017年 / 60卷
关键词
Agriculture; CRISPR-Cas; Genome editing; Plant science;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
CRISPR-Cas technology has raised considerable interest among plant scientists, both in basic science and in plant breeding. Presently, the generation of random mutations at a predetermined site of the genome is well mastered, just like the targeted insertion of transgenes, although both remain restricted to species or genotypes amenable for plant transformation. On the other hand, true genome editing, i.e. the deliberate replacement of one or several nucleotides of the genome in a predetermined fashion, is limited to some rather particular examples that generally concern genes allowing positive selection, for example tolerance to herbicides. Therefore, further technological developments are necessary to fully exploit the potential of genome editing in enlarging the gene pool beyond the natural variability available in a given species. In principle, the technology can be applied to any quality related, agronomical or ecological trait, under the condition of upstream knowledge on the genes to be targeted and the precise modifications necessary to improve alleles. Published proof of concepts concern a wide range of agronomical traits, the most frequent being disease resistance, herbicide tolerance and the biochemical composition of harvested products. The regulatory status of the plants obtained by CRISPR-Cas technology raises numerous questions, in particular with regard to the plants that carry in their genomes the punctual modifications caused by the presence of the Cas9 nuclease but not the nuclease itself. Without clarification by the competent authorities, CRISPR-Cas technology would continue to be a powerful tool in functional genomics, but its potential in plant breeding would remain untapped.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 360
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] CRISPR-Cas in its prime
    Zlotorynski, Eytan
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS MOLECULAR CELL BIOLOGY, 2019, 20 (12) : 718 - 719
  • [32] Harvest time for CRISPR-Cas?
    Gross, Michael
    [J]. CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (20) : R903 - R905
  • [33] The CRISPR-Cas system in Enterobacteriaceae
    Medina-Aparicio, Liliana
    Davila, Sonia
    Rebollar-Flores, Javier E.
    Calva, Edmundo
    Hernandez-Lucas, Ismael
    [J]. PATHOGENS AND DISEASE, 2018, 76 (01):
  • [34] Special focus CRISPR-Cas
    Marchfelder, Anita
    [J]. RNA BIOLOGY, 2013, 10 (05) : 655 - 658
  • [35] CRISPR-Cas Antiviral Strategies
    Jin, Dong-Yan
    Berkhout, Ben
    [J]. VIRUS RESEARCH, 2018, 244 : 285 - 285
  • [36] CRISPR-Cas immunity in prokaryotes
    Luciano A. Marraffini
    [J]. Nature, 2015, 526 : 55 - 61
  • [37] Staying on target with CRISPR-Cas
    Carroll, Dana
    [J]. NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2013, 31 (09) : 807 - 809
  • [38] CRISPR-Cas changing biology?
    Janella Baxter
    [J]. Biology & Philosophy, 2019, 34
  • [39] Metagenomics: Mining for CRISPR-Cas
    York A.
    [J]. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2017, 15 (3) : 133 - 133
  • [40] CRISPR-Cas in the laboratory classroom
    Trudel, Luc
    Frenette, Michel
    Moineau, Sylvain
    [J]. NATURE MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 2 (03):