Against Hamri’s argument for the ultimate ground of being

被引：0
|
作者：
Einar Duenger Bohn
机构：
[1] University of Agder,
来源：
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion | 2018年 / 84卷
关键词：
The ultimate ground of being; The cosmological argument; God; Ground; Cause;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
In this paper, I reply to Hamri's (Int J Philos Relig. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-017-9625-2, 2017) new kind of cosmological argument for the ultimate ground of being by blocking the argument in more than one place.
引用
收藏
页码：233 / 236
页数：3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Darwin's Causal Argument Against Creationism
    Clatterbuck, Hayley
    [J]. PHILOSOPHERS IMPRINT, 2022, 22 (23): : 1 - 26
  • [42] Quine's argument against deviant logics
    Wagner, Henri
    [J]. DIALOGUE-CANADIAN PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW, 2023, 62 (01) : 113 - 137
  • [43] Putnam's argument against metaphysical realism
    Orlando, E
    [J]. CRITICA-REVISTA HISPANOAMERICANA DE FILOSOFIA, 2000, 32 (94): : 3 - 27
  • [44] On Field’s Epistemological Argument Against Platonism
    Ivan Kasa
    [J]. Studia Logica, 2010, 96 : 141 - 147
  • [45] Mill's argument against religious knowledge
    Mawson, T. J.
    [J]. RELIGIOUS STUDIES, 2009, 45 (04) : 417 - 434
  • [46] A critique of Malpass's argument against Supervaluationism
    De Florio, Ciro
    Frigerio, Aldo
    [J]. THEORIA-A SWEDISH JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2023, 89 (01): : 31 - 41
  • [47] On Sharon and Spectre’s argument against closure
    Juan Comesaña
    [J]. Philosophical Studies, 2017, 174 : 1039 - 1046
  • [48] Dummett’s argument against classical logic
    Michaelis Michael
    [J]. Philosophia, 1999, 27 : 359 - 382
  • [49] BERKELEY'S ARGUMENT AGAINST THE MATERIALITY OF THE WORLD
    Stoenescu, Constantin
    [J]. ANALELE UNIVERSITATII BUCURESTI-FILOSOFIE-ANNALS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF BUCHAREST-PHILOSOPHY, 2011, 60 (02): : 3 - 11
  • [50] It's Not About Being Right: Developing Argument Through Debate
    Malloy, Jacquelynn A.
    Tracy, Kelly N.
    Scales, Roya Q.
    Menickelli, Kristin
    Scales, W. David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LITERACY RESEARCH, 2020, 52 (01) : 79 - 100
12345