Patient preference for deferasirox film-coated versus dispersible tablet formulation: a sequential-design phase 2 study in patients with thalassemia

被引:0
|
作者
Vip Viprakasit
Mona M. Hamdy
Hoda M. A. Hassab
Laila M. Sherief
Muneer Al-Bagshi
Mohammed Khattab
Suporn Chuncharunee
Phu Chi Dung
Alphan Küpesiz
Ankita Shekhawat
Yamini Sonawane
Laura Torres Perez
Cassandra Slader
Ali T. Taher
机构
[1] Mahidol University,Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital
[2] Cairo University,Clinical Research Center
[3] Alexandria University,Pediatric Department & Clinical Research Center, Faculty of Medicine
[4] Zagazig University,Faculty of Medicine
[5] Hereditary Blood Disease Center,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine
[6] Centre d’Hématologie Et d’oncologie Pédiatrique - CHU Ibn Sina Rabat,undefined
[7] Ramathibodi Hospital,undefined
[8] Hochiminh City Blood Transfusion Hematology Hospital,undefined
[9] Akdeniz University,undefined
[10] Novartis Healthcare Private Limited,undefined
[11] Novartis Pharma AG,undefined
[12] American University of Beirut Medical Center,undefined
来源
Annals of Hematology | 2023年 / 102卷
关键词
Deferasirox; Dispersible tablets; Film-coated tablet; Patient-reported outcome; Patient preference; Compliance; Adherence; Palatability;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Iron chelation therapy (ICT) is the mainstay of treatment in patients with thalassemia requiring blood transfusions. This phase 2 JUPITER study evaluated patient preference between film-coated tablet (FCT) and dispersible tablet (DT) in transfusion-dependent thalassemia (TDT) or non-TDT (NTDT) patients treated with both formulations in a sequential manner. The primary endpoint was patient-reported preference for FCT over DT, while secondary outcomes included patient reported outcomes (PROs) evaluated by overall preference, and by age, thalassemia transfusion status, and previous ICT status. Out of 183 patients screened, 140 and 136 patients completed the treatment periods 1 and 2 of the core study, respectively. At week 48, the majority of patients preferred FCT over DT (90.3 vs. 7.5%; difference of percentage: 0.83 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.75–0.89; P < 0.0001]). FCT scored better on secondary PROs and showed less severe gastrointestinal symptoms than DT, except in the change of modified Satisfaction with Iron Chelation Therapy (mSICT) preference scores, which were similar for both the formulations. Patients with TDT had stable ferritin levels, while it showed a downward trend up to week 48 in patients with NTDT on deferasirox treatment. Overall, 89.9% of patients reported ≥ 1 adverse event (AE), of which 20.3% experienced ≥ 1 serious AE. The most common treatment-emergent AEs were proteinuria, pyrexia, urine protein/creatinine ratio increase, diarrhea, upper respiratory tract infections, transaminase increase, and pharyngitis. Overall, this study reinforced the observations from the previous study by showing a distinct patient preference for FCT over DT formulation and further supported the potential benefits of life-long compliance with ICT.
引用
收藏
页码:2039 / 2049
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [31] Phase III clinical trial to evaluate patient's preference for subcutaneous (SC) versus intravenous (IV) trastuzumab administration in patients with HER2 positive, advanced breast cancer (ABC) under IV trastuzumab treatment for at least 4 months and without disease progression. ChangHER-SC study (GEICAM/2012-07)
    Ciruelos, E.
    Gonzalez, E.
    Lluch, A.
    Garrigos, L.
    Quiroga, V.
    Anton, A.
    Pascual, T.
    Montano, A.
    Angulo, M. dM
    Camara, M. dC
    Amigo, Y.
    Carrasco, E.
    Casas, A.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 76