Effects of different compaction methods on the performance of reinforced earth retaining wall

被引:0
|
作者
Lihua Li
Chengbin Fan
Han Yan
Hang Li
Xinlong Zhou
Na Chen
Jie Huang
Zhi Chen
机构
[1] Hubei University of Technology,School of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Environment
[2] The University of Texas at San Antonio,Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
关键词
Tensile load; Compaction stress; Reinforced earth retaining wall; Compaction methods;
D O I
10.1007/s12517-021-08678-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Geogrid-reinforced earth is an advanced composite material which is widely used in the construction of retaining wall which is often needed in the transportation structure. Different compaction methods have great differences in wall deformation and materials of soil reinforcement strain, which seriously affect the performance of retaining wall. Therefore, it is necessary to further study the influence of different compaction methods on the retaining wall behind the face plate. Through a series of numerical simulation tests, the influence depth of total displacement, tensile load of materials of soil reinforcement, settlement displacement of wall top, and compaction stress is analyzed, and the influence of different compaction methods on reinforced earth retaining wall near face plate is studied. The results show that there is a certain lightweight compaction width between 1 and 2 m, which makes the wall appear a “bow” shape with zero deformation at the top of the panel. When the lightweight compaction width is less than 0.5 m, the tensile load of the materials of soil reinforcement near the face plate changes significantly. When the stress is greater than 2 m, the internal stress and the stress difference between the two ends of the materials of soil reinforcement decrease. The deformation trend of the numerical simulation model of each compacted plate is consistent with the total displacement of the plate and the tensile load of the materials of soil reinforcement. The part of the wall top that is more than 4 m from the panel has nothing to do with the light compaction width value. The closer the wall is to the roof, the greater the maximum tensile load, compaction load, soil depth, and stress.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] REINFORCED EARTH RETAINING WALL AT A3/A322 INTERCHANGE: INSTRUMENTATION, SITE OBSERVATION AND PERFORMANCE.
    Murray, R.T.
    Hollinghurst, E.
    Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers (London), 1986, 80 (pt 1): : 1343 - 1362
  • [32] Seismic Internal Stability Analysis of Modular Block Reinforced Earth Retaining Wall
    Hulagabali, Anand M.
    Solanki, C. H.
    Dodagoudar, G. R.
    Anitha, Nayak
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOSYNTHETICS AND GROUND ENGINEERING, 2023, 9 (03)
  • [33] Experimental study on static and dynamic performances of modular reinforced earth retaining wall
    Wang Jia-quan
    Zhong Wen-tao
    Huang Shi-bin
    Tang Yi
    ROCK AND SOIL MECHANICS, 2023, 44 (05) : 1435 - 1444
  • [34] Calculation of bar tension in reinforced earth retaining wall under earthquake load
    Jia, Liang
    Zhu, Yan-Peng
    Lai, Chun-Jing
    Yantu Gongcheng Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35 (SUPPL.1): : 412 - 417
  • [35] Effect of interface on pressure-settlement characteristics of reinforced earth retaining wall
    Patil, Nayana N.
    Shivashankar, R.
    Rajashekharaswamy, H. M.
    Computer Methods and Recent Advances in Geomechanics, 2015, : 1403 - 1407
  • [36] Model Experimental Research of Double-sided Reinforced Earth Retaining Wall
    Su, Jun
    Yang, Xiaoqiang
    ADVANCES IN INDUSTRIAL AND CIVIL ENGINEERING, PTS 1-4, 2012, 594-597 : 482 - 486
  • [38] Parametric Study and Design Charts Based on Movement of Reinforced Earth Retaining Wall
    Mowafy, Y. M.
    El-Sakhawy, N. . R.
    El-Sakhawy, R. R.
    El-Gaaly, O. A.
    INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN GEO-ENGINEERING, 2010, : 553 - 561
  • [39] REINFORCED EARTH RETAINING WALL AT A3/A322 INTERCHANGE - DISCUSSION
    HOLLINGHURST, E
    MURRAY, RT
    MCGOWN, A
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS PART 1-DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION, 1987, 82 : 1009 - 1011
  • [40] Seismic Internal Stability Analysis of Modular Block Reinforced Earth Retaining Wall
    Anand M. Hulagabali
    C. H. Solanki
    G. R. Dodagoudar
    Nayak Anitha
    International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 2023, 9