Energy, exergy and exergoenvironmental (3E) analyses of power plant integrated with heliostats solar field

被引:0
|
作者
Eduardo J. C. Cavalcanti
Jonathan L. B. Azevedo
机构
[1] UFRN - Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte,
关键词
Exergy; Exergoenvironmental analysis; Heliostats; Solar field; Tower power plant;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper analyzes a solar tower power plant driven by a heliostat solar field, which has no fuel consumption. Exergy and exergoenvironmental assessments are utilized to evaluate the sustainability of power, based on the Eco-Indicator 99 method. This solar system does not burn fuel, and therefore there is no generation of greenhouse gases (GHG) due to combustion. The direct normal irradiance per hour was considered to evaluate the performance of the plant. The results indicate that the heliostat field and solar receptor present the highest exergy destruction rates and are responsible for the highest environmental burden of plant. The worst components from an exergoenvironmental perspective were identified. The best case of the solar tower power plant considers a daily operation of 12 h. This condition produced the lowest specific environmental impact of electricity (0.543 mPt/kWh) and the highest exergy efficiency, 18.89%. However, this condition led to the highest environmental impact rate for components, 55.99 Pt/h, due to the net power of 104.69 MW. When the system operates for 24 h per day, the specific environmental impact of electricity is 0.95 mPt/kWh. The results are compared with the literature data. The effect of the energy storage system reduced the net power and increased the amount of molten salts. The environmental impact rate associated with components and total environmental impact rate have a dominant effect on the environmental performance of the plant. A sensitivity analysis showed the effect of operation time, which reduces exergy efficiency and increases the specific environmental impact of electricity.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Energy, exergy, economic, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental (5E) analyses of a triple cycle with carbon capture
    Talebizadehsardari, P.
    Ehyaei, M. A.
    Ahmadi, A.
    Jamali, D. H.
    Shirmohammadi, R.
    Eyvazian, A.
    Ghasemi, A.
    Rosen, Marc A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CO2 UTILIZATION, 2020, 41
  • [42] Advanced Exergy, Exergoeconomic, and Exergoenvironmental Analyses of Integrated Solar-Assisted Gasification Cycle for Producing Power and Steam from Heavy Refinery Fuels
    Jadidi, Esmaeil
    Khoshgoftar Manesh, Mohammad Hasan
    Delpisheh, Mostafa
    Onishi, Viviani Caroline
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (24)
  • [43] Integration of thermal performance of sour cherry concentration plant with 3E procedures: energy, exergy and exergoeconomy
    Nasim Sedaghat Herfeh
    Hossein Mobli
    Ali M. Nikbakht
    Alireza Keyhani
    Ahmad Piri
    [J]. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2022, 147 : 10419 - 10437
  • [44] Investigation of (3E) energy, exergy, and environmental analysis of syngas production for combined power and cooling plant by testing six different biomasses
    Parvez, Mohd
    Khan, Osama
    Howari, Haidar
    [J]. BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY, 2023,
  • [45] Energy, exergy and economic (3E) analysis of solar thermal energy assisted cascade Rankine cycle for reverse osmosis
    Raninga, Milan
    Mudgal, Anurag
    Patel, Vivek
    Patel, Jatin
    [J]. ENERGY, 2024, 293
  • [46] Energy and exergy analyses for a combined cycle power plant in Jordan
    Altarawneh, Obieda R.
    Alsarayreh, Alanood A.
    Al-Falahat, Ala'a M.
    Al-Kheetan, Mazen J.
    Alrwashdeh, Saad S.
    [J]. CASE STUDIES IN THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 31
  • [47] Energy and exergy analyses of a VVER type nuclear power plant
    Terzi, Rauf
    Tukenmez, Ibrahim
    Kurt, Erol
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2016, 41 (29) : 12465 - 12476
  • [48] 3E (Energy-Exergy-Economic) comparative study of integrating wet and dry cooling systems in solar tower power plants
    Boukelia, T. E.
    Bouraoui, A.
    Laouafi, A.
    Djimli, S.
    Kabar, Y.
    [J]. ENERGY, 2020, 200
  • [49] Investigation of concentrating solar-biomass-fired power technologies based on advanced exergy, exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses
    Biboum, Alain
    Yilanci, Ahmet
    Thierry, Sosso Mayi Olivier
    Yimen, Nasser
    Mouangue, Ruben
    [J]. ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2023, 45 (04) : 9668 - 9683
  • [50] Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analysis of an integrated solar gas turbine/combined cycle power plant
    Bonforte, Giuseppe
    Buchgeister, Jens
    Manfrida, Giampaolo
    Petela, Karolina
    [J]. ENERGY, 2018, 156 : 352 - 359