Polymorphisms in DNA double-strand break repair genes and risk of breast cancer: two population-based studies in USA and Poland, and meta-analyses

被引:0
|
作者
Montserrat García-Closas
Kathleen M. Egan
Polly A. Newcomb
Louise A. Brinton
Linda Titus-Ernstoff
Stephen Chanock
Robert Welch
Jolanta Lissowska
Beata Peplonska
Neonila Szeszenia-Dabrowska
Witold Zatonski
Alicja Bardin-Mikolajczak
Jeffery P. Struewing
机构
[1] National Cancer Institute,Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics
[2] National Institutes of Health,Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
[3] Department of Health and Human Services,Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Population Health Sciences
[4] Vanderbilt University Medical Center,Dartmouth Medical School
[5] Cancer Prevention Research Group,Department of Health and Human Services, Core Genotyping Facility, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics
[6] University of Wisconsin,Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention
[7] Norris Cotton Cancer Center,Department of Health and Human Services, Laboratory of Population Genetics
[8] National Cancer Institute,undefined
[9] National Institutes of Health,undefined
[10] M. Sklodowska-Curie Institute of Oncology and Cancer Center,undefined
[11] Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine,undefined
[12] National Cancer Institute,undefined
[13] National Institutes of Health,undefined
来源
Human Genetics | 2006年 / 119卷
关键词
Breast Cancer; Breast Cancer Risk; Polish Study; Polish Population; Homozygous Variant;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The double-strand break DNA repair pathway has been implicated in breast carcinogenesis. We evaluated the association between 19 polymorphisms in seven genes in this pathway (XRCC2, XRCC3, BRCA2, ZNF350, BRIP1, XRCC4, LIG4) and breast cancer risk in two population-based studies in USA (3,368 cases and 2,880 controls) and Poland (1,995 cases and 2,296 controls). These data suggested weak associations with breast cancer risk for XRCC3 T241M and IVS7-14A>G (pooled odds ratio (95% confidence interval): 1.18 (1.04–1.34) and 0.85 (0.73–0.98) for homozygous variant vs wild-type genotypes, respectively), and for an uncommon variant in ZNF350S472P (1.24 (1.05–1.48)), with no evidence for study heterogeneity. The remaining variants examined had no significant relationships to breast cancer risk. Meta-analyses of studies in Caucasian populations, including ours, provided some support for a weak association for homozygous variants for XRCC3 T241M (1.16 (1.04–1.30); total of 10,979 cases and 10,423 controls) and BRCA2 N372H (1.13 (1.10–1.28); total of 13,032 cases and 13,314 controls), and no support for XRCC2 R188H (1.06 (0.59–1.91); total of 8,394 cases and 8,404 controls). In conclusion, the genetic variants evaluated are unlikely to have a substantial overall association with breast cancer risk; however, weak associations are possible for XRCC3 (T241M and IVS7-14A>G), BRCA2 N372H, and ZNF350 S472P. Evaluation of potential underlying gene–gene interactions or associations in population subgroups will require even larger sample sizes.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A fine-scale dissection of the DNA double-strand break repair machinery and its implications for breast cancer therapy
    Liu, Chao
    Srihari, Sriganesh
    Cao, Kim-Anh Le
    Chenevix-Trench, Georgia
    Simpson, Peter T.
    Ragan, Mark A.
    Khanna, Kum Kum
    NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2014, 42 (10) : 6106 - 6127
  • [32] DNA double-strand break repair genotype and phenotype and breast cancer risk within sisters from the New York site of the Breast Cancer Family Registry (BCFR)
    Hui-Chen Wu
    Lissette Delgado-Cruzata
    Nicola Machella
    Qiao Wang
    Regina M. Santella
    Mary Beth Terry
    Cancer Causes & Control, 2013, 24 : 2157 - 2168
  • [33] DNA double-strand break repair genotype and phenotype and breast cancer risk within sisters from the New York site of the Breast Cancer Family Registry (BCFR)
    Wu, Hui-Chen
    Delgado-Cruzata, Lissette
    Machella, Nicola
    Wang, Qiao
    Santella, Regina M.
    Terry, Mary Beth
    CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2013, 24 (12) : 2157 - 2168
  • [34] The DNA double-strand break repair genes BARD1 and RAD51 as molecular targets for brain metastases from breast cancer
    Woditschka, Stephan
    Palmieri, Diane
    Flores, Natasha M.
    Sledge, George W.
    Badve, Sunil
    Steeg, Patricia S.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 71
  • [35] Genetic polymorphisms in the one-carbon metabolism pathway and breast cancer risk: A population-based case-control study and meta-analyses
    Lissowska, Jolanta
    Gaudet, Mia M.
    Brinton, Louise A.
    Chanock, Stephen J.
    Peplonska, Beata
    Welch, Robert
    Zatonski, Witold
    Szeszenia-Dabrowska, Neonila
    Park, Sue
    Sherman, Mark
    Garcia-Closas, Montserrat
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2007, 120 (12) : 2696 - 2703
  • [36] DNA double-strand break repair capacity and its pathway gene variants predict the risk and prognosis of lung cancer
    Li, Peng
    Hao, Lidan
    Zhang, Cuicui
    Zhang, Zhe
    Yang, Sen
    Wu, Xuan
    Li, Ganghua
    Zhang, Chao
    Liu, Zhensheng
    Wang, Qiming
    LUNG CANCER, 2024, 192
  • [37] DNA Double-Strand Break Response and Repair Gene Polymorphisms May Influence Therapy Results and Prognosis in Head and Neck Cancer Patients
    Butkiewicz, Dorota
    Krzesniak, Malgorzata
    Gdowicz-Klosok, Agnieszka
    Skladowski, Krzysztof
    Rutkowski, Tomasz
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (20)
  • [38] Melatonin sensitizes human breast cancer cells to ionizing radiation by downregulating proteins involved in double-strand DNA break repair
    Alonso-Gonzalez, Carolina
    Gonzalez, Alicia
    Martinez-Campa, Carlos
    Gomez-Arozamena, Jose
    Cos, Samuel
    JOURNAL OF PINEAL RESEARCH, 2015, 58 (02) : 189 - 197
  • [39] Analyses of DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Pathways in Tandem Arrays of HXT Genes of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae (vol 58, pg 957, 2020)
    Choi, Ju-Hee
    Lim, Ye-Seul
    Kim, Min-Ku
    Bae, Sung-Ho
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2024, 62 (10) : 931 - 931
  • [40] Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and breast cancer risk in Russian population: a case–control study
    Alexandra S. Shadrina
    Natalia A. Ermolenko
    Uljana A. Boyarskikh
    Tatiana V. Sinkina
    Alexandr F. Lazarev
    Valentina D. Petrova
    Maxim L. Filipenko
    Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 2016, 16 : 21 - 28