Technical aspects of multifocal ERG recording

被引:36
|
作者
David Keating
Stuart Parks
Aled Evans
机构
[1] Gartnavel General Hospital,ElectroDiagnostic Imaging Unit, Tennent Institute of Ophthalmology
[2] Southern General Hospital,Department of Clinical Physics & Bio
关键词
multifocal analysis; multifocal ERG; stimulus delivery;
D O I
10.1023/A:1002723501303
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
There are a wide range of variables which can influence the quality of the multifocal response. It is possible to place these variables into one of four categories. First, the method of stimulus delivery will determine the field of view, interference levels and the duration of on-state stimulation. Second, data acquisition variables such as electrode type and placement, amplifier specifications and filter bandwidth settings will have a direct impact on waveform shape and on the topographic distribution of signal amplitudes. Third, patient variables such as fixation, pupil dilation and refractive error will also contribute to the multifocal response. Fourth, there are many measurements that can be taken from multifocal recordings. In addition to standard amplitude and implicit time measures (the implicit time measure in the multifocal response is becoming increasingly important particularly in early stages of disease processes), the scalar product measure provides information on waveform shape. The conventional impulse and higher order responses will be different for different modes of stimulation such as Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) and Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) systems and latency shifts will be introduced if not corrected in software. Procedures which could lead to misleading interpretation include artefact rejection, averaging with neighbours and summing of responses. These procedures should be handled with caution.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 98
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Recording Rod ON and OFF Responses in ERG and Multifocal ERG
    Changzheng Chen
    Chengguo Zuo
    Changhua Piao
    Yozo Miyake
    Documenta Ophthalmologica, 2005, 111 : 73 - 81
  • [2] Recording rod ON and OFF responses in ERG and multifocal ERG
    Chen, CZ
    Zuo, CG
    Piao, CH
    Miyake, Y
    DOCUMENTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2005, 111 (02) : 73 - 81
  • [3] A new mode of recording retinal activity: multifocal ERG
    Mack, G
    Dolfus, H
    Flament, J
    Mohand-Said, S
    Sahel, J
    JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 1999, 22 (02): : 221 - 225
  • [4] Multifocal ERG recording by the VERIS technique and its clinical applications
    Kretschmann, U
    Gendo, K
    Seeliger, M
    Zrenner, E
    MACULAR AND RETINAL DISEASES: RECENT ADVANCES IN DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 1997, 29 : 8 - 14
  • [5] FUNCTIONAL TOPOGRAPHY USING MULTIFOCAL ERG RECORDING IN RETINAL DISORDERS
    REICHEL, E
    RUTLEDGE, BK
    BRUCE, A
    SUTTER, E
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1995, 36 (04) : S451 - S451
  • [6] Multifocal electroretinogram (ERG): Effects of spatial resolution and recording time.
    Raiguru, DS
    Feigl, B
    Wang, M
    Bearse, MA
    Sutter, EE
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2001, 42 (04) : S70 - S70
  • [7] Influence of cataract on the multifocal ERG recording -: a pre- and postoperative comparison
    Wördehoff, UV
    Palmowski, AM
    Heinemann-Vemaleken, B
    Allgayer, R
    Ruprecht, KW
    DOCUMENTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2004, 108 (01) : 67 - 75
  • [8] Comparison of two techniques and determination of parameters for multifocal ERG recording in mice
    Mayser, HM
    Salchow, DJ
    Zrenner, E
    Seeliger, MW
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2002, 43 : U409 - U409
  • [9] Influence of cataract on the multifocal ERG recording – a pre- and postoperative comparison
    Ursula V. Wördehoff
    Anja M. Palmowski
    Bernhild Heinemann-Vernaleken
    Reiner Allgayer
    Klaus W. Ruprecht
    Documenta Ophthalmologica, 2004, 108 : 67 - 76
  • [10] Which Examination Duration is Required for a Sufficient Recording Quality in Multifocal ERG?
    Mazinani, B. A.
    Vehr, A. K.
    Lin, Y. -L.
    Roessler, G. F.
    Plange, N.
    Walter, P.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2010, 51 (13)