A 25 years experience of group-housed sows–reproduction in animal welfare-friendly systems

被引:0
|
作者
Stig Einarsson
Ylva Sjunnesson
Fredrik Hultén
Lena Eliasson-Selling
Anne-Marie Dalin
Nils Lundeheim
Ulf Magnusson
机构
[1] Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences,Division of Reproduction, Department of Clinical Sciences
[2] Medical Product Agency,Swedish Animal Health Service
[3] Kungsängens Gård,Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics
[4] Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences,undefined
关键词
Sow reproduction; Housing; Animal welfare; EU regulations;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Since January 1 2013, group housing of sows has been compulsory within the European Union (EU) in all pig holdings with more than ten sows. Sows and gilts need to be kept in groups from 4 weeks after service to 1 week before the expected time of farrowing (Article 3(4) of Directive 2008/120/EC on the protection of pigs). The legislation regarding group housing was adopted already in 2001 and a long transitional period was allowed to give member states and producers enough time for adaptation. Even so, group housing of sows still seems to be uncommon in the EU, and is also uncommon in commercial pig farming systems in the rest of the world. In this review we share our experience of the Swedish 25 years of animal welfare legislation stipulating that sows must be loose-housed which de facto means group housed. The two most important concerns related to reproductive function among group-housed sows are the occurrence of lactational oestrus when sows are group-housed during lactation, and the stress that is associated with group housing during mating and gestation. Field and clinical observations in non-lactating, group-housed sows in Sweden suggest that by making basic facts known about the pig reproductive physiology related to mating, we might achieve application of efficient batch-wise breeding without pharmacological interventions. Group housing of lactating sows has some production disadvantages and somewhat lower productivity would likely have to be expected. Recordings of behavioural indicators in different housing systems suggest a lower welfare level in stalled animals compared with group-housed ones. However, there are no consistent effects on the reproductive performance associated with different housing systems. Experimental studies suggest that the most sensitive period, regarding disturbance of reproductive functions by external stressors, is the time around oestrus. We conclude that by keeping sows according to the pig welfare-friendly Directive 2008/120/EC, it is possible to combine group-housing of sows with good reproductive performance and productivity. However, substantially increased research and development is needed to optimize these systems.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] A 25 years experience of group-housed sows-reproduction in animal welfare-friendly systems
    Einarsson, Stig
    Sjunnesson, Ylva
    Hulten, Fredrik
    Eliasson-Selling, Lena
    Dalin, Anne-Marie
    Lundeheim, Nils
    Magnusson, Ulf
    [J]. ACTA VETERINARIA SCANDINAVICA, 2014, 56
  • [2] Reproduction of group-housed sows
    Peltoniemi O.
    Björkman S.
    Maes D.
    [J]. Porcine Health Management, 2 (1)
  • [3] Individual and pen-based oral fluid sampling: A welfare-friendly sampling method for group-housed gestating sows
    Pol, Francoise
    Dorenlor, Virginie
    Eono, Florent
    Eudier, Solveig
    Eveno, Eric
    Liegard-Vanhecke, Dorine
    Rose, Nicolas
    Fablet, Christelle
    [J]. PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2017, 147 : 58 - 65
  • [4] Skin lesions and callosities in group-housed pregnant sows: Animal-related welfare indicators
    Leeb, B
    Leeb, C
    Troxler, J
    Schuh, M
    [J]. ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION A-ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2001, 51 : 82 - 87
  • [5] Feeding and nutritional strategies to improve welfare of group-housed gestating sows
    Li, Yuzhi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2020, 98 : 8 - 8
  • [6] Ammonia emission from four systems for group-housed sows
    Timmerman, M
    Hoofs, AIJ
    van Wagenberg, AV
    [J]. SWINE HOUSING II, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 122 - 128
  • [7] Advancing and Refining Animal Welfare within an Established Group-housed Primate Facility
    Philip, D.
    Archibald, W. J.
    Zubiaurre, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR LABORATORY ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2008, 47 (05): : 120 - 120
  • [8] A flooring comparison: The impact of rubber mats on the health, behavior, and welfare of group-housed sows at breeding
    Elmore, Monica R. P.
    Garner, Joseph P.
    Johnson, Anna K.
    Richert, Brian T.
    Pajor, Edmond A.
    [J]. APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2010, 123 (1-2) : 7 - 15
  • [9] An animal-based welfare assessment of group-housed calves on UK dairy farms
    Whay, HR
    Main, DCJ
    Green, LE
    Webster, AJF
    [J]. ANIMAL WELFARE, 2003, 12 (04) : 611 - 617
  • [10] Herd and sow-related risk factors for mortality in sows in group-housed systems
    Jensen, Tina Birk
    Toft, Nils
    Bonde, Marianne Kjaer
    Kongsted, Anne Grete
    Kristensen, Anders Ringgaard
    Sorensen, Jan Tind
    [J]. PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2012, 103 (01) : 31 - 37