Individual and pen-based oral fluid sampling: A welfare-friendly sampling method for group-housed gestating sows

被引:11
|
作者
Pol, Francoise [1 ,2 ]
Dorenlor, Virginie [1 ,2 ]
Eono, Florent [1 ,2 ]
Eudier, Solveig [1 ,2 ]
Eveno, Eric [1 ,2 ]
Liegard-Vanhecke, Dorine [1 ,2 ]
Rose, Nicolas [1 ,2 ]
Fablet, Christelle [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Agence Natl Secur Sanit Anses, BP 53, F-22440 Ploufragan, France
[2] Univ Bretagne Loire, Rennes, France
关键词
Sow; Behaviour; Group housing; Welfare; Oral fluid sampling; RESPIRATORY-SYNDROME-VIRUS; INFLUENZA-A VIRUS; ENVIRONMENTAL ENRICHMENT; GROWING PIGS; COLLECTION; INFECTION; BEHAVIOR; SURVEILLANCE; ANTIBODY; MOTIVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.08.011
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The aims of this study were to assess the feasibility of individual and pen-based oral fluid sampling (OFS) in 35 pig herds with group-housed sows, compare these methods to blood sampling, and assess the factors influencing the success of sampling. Individual samples were collected from at least 30 sows per herd. Pen-based OFS was performed using devices placed in at least three pens for 45 min. Information related to the farm, the sows, and their living conditions were collected. Factors significantly associated with the duration of sampling and the chewing behaviour of sows were identified by logistic regression. Individual OFS took 2 min 42 s on average; the type of floor, swab size, and operator were associated with a sampling time > 2 min. Pen-based OFS was obtained from 112 devices (62.2%). The type of floor, parity, pen-level activity, and type of feeding were associated with chewing behaviour. Pen activity was associated with the latency to interact with the device. The type of floor, gestation stage, parity, group size, and latency to interact with the device were associated with a chewing time > 10 min. After 15, 30 and 45 min of pen-based OFS, 48%, 60% and 65% of the sows were lying down, respectively. The time spent after the beginning of sampling, genetic type, and time elapsed since the last meal were associated with 50% of the sows lying down at one time point. The mean time to blood sample the sows was 1 min 16 s and 2 min 52 s if the number of operators required was considered in the sampling time estimation. The genetic type, parity, and type of floor were significantly associated with a sampling time higher than 1 min 30 s. This study shows that individual OFS is easy to perform in group-housed sows by a single operator, even though straw-bedded animals take longer to sample than animals housed on slatted floors, and suggests some guidelines to optimise pen-based OFS success.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 65
页数:8
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] A 25 years experience of group-housed sows–reproduction in animal welfare-friendly systems
    Stig Einarsson
    Ylva Sjunnesson
    Fredrik Hultén
    Lena Eliasson-Selling
    Anne-Marie Dalin
    Nils Lundeheim
    Ulf Magnusson
    [J]. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 56
  • [2] A 25 years experience of group-housed sows-reproduction in animal welfare-friendly systems
    Einarsson, Stig
    Sjunnesson, Ylva
    Hulten, Fredrik
    Eliasson-Selling, Lena
    Dalin, Anne-Marie
    Lundeheim, Nils
    Magnusson, Ulf
    [J]. ACTA VETERINARIA SCANDINAVICA, 2014, 56
  • [3] Feeding and nutritional strategies to improve welfare of group-housed gestating sows
    Li, Yuzhi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2020, 98 : 8 - 8
  • [4] Sampling guidelines for oral fluid-based surveys of group-housed animals
    Rotolo, Marisa L.
    Sun, Yaxuan
    Wang, Chong
    Gimenez-Lirola, Luis
    Baum, David H.
    Gauger, Phillip C.
    Harmon, Karen M.
    Hoogland, Marlin
    Main, Rodger
    Zimmerman, Jeffrey J.
    [J]. VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 209 : 20 - 29
  • [5] Salivary cortisol concentrations of group-housed gestating sows: individual vs. group samples.
    Li, Y.
    Cui, S.
    Yang, X.
    Crooker, B. A.
    Baidoo, S. K.
    Johnston, L. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2017, 95 : 8 - 9
  • [6] Oral fluid versus blood sampling in group-housed sows and finishing pigs: Feasibility and performance of antibody detection for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV)
    Fablet, C.
    Renson, P.
    Pol, F.
    Dorenlor, V.
    Mahe, S.
    Eono, F.
    Eveno, E.
    Le Dimna, M.
    Liegard-Vanhecke, D.
    Eudier, S.
    Rose, N.
    Bourry, O.
    [J]. VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 204 : 25 - 34
  • [7] Effect of continuous access to feeding stalls during mixing on behavior, welfare, and performance of group-housed gestating sows in different social ranks
    Wang, Lihua H.
    Li, Yuzhi Z.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 96 (03) : 386 - 396
  • [8] Individual Identification Method for Group-housed Pigs Based on Optimal Feature Extraction
    Zhu, Weixing
    Chen, Jiali
    Guo, Yizheng
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE MACHINERY, ELECTRONICS AND CONTROL SIMULATION, 2014, 614 : 436 - 439
  • [9] EFFECTS OF PEN SIZE, PARTIAL STALLS AND METHOD OF FEEDING ON WELFARE-RELATED BEHAVIORAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL-RESPONSES OF GROUP-HOUSED PIGS
    BARNETT, JL
    HEMSWORTH, PH
    CRONIN, GM
    NEWMAN, EA
    MCCALLUM, TH
    CHILTON, D
    [J]. APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 1992, 34 (03) : 207 - 220
  • [10] Rope-based oral fluid sampling for early detection of classical swine fever in domestic pigs at group level
    Dietze, Klaas
    Tucakov, Anna
    Engel, Tatjana
    Wirtz, Sabine
    Depner, Klaus
    Globig, Anja
    Kammerer, Robert
    Mouchantat, Susan
    [J]. BMC VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2017, 13