The significance of modified Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens

被引:0
|
作者
Burkhard Helpap
Lars Egevad
机构
[1] Academic Hospital of the University of Freiburg,Department of Pathology, Center of Uropathology, General Hospital Hegau
[2] Karolinska Hospital,Bodensee
[3] International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC),Klinikum Singen
来源
Virchows Archiv | 2006年 / 449卷
关键词
Adenocarcinoma of the prostate; Modified Gleason grading; Core needle biopsy; Radical prostatectomy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
At an International Society of Urological Pathology consensus conference in 2005, the Gleason grading system for prostatic carcinoma underwent its first major revision. Gleason pattern 4 now includes most cribriform patterns and also fused and poorly formed glands. Our aims were to compare the grade distributions and assess the agreement between biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens for the modified and conventional Gleason grading. More than 3,000 radical prostatectomy (RP), needle biopsies (NB) and transurethral resection specimens were assigned modified Gleason score (GS). In NB, modified GS 3 + 3 = 6 and 3 + 4 = 7a were almost equally common, while in RP, 3 + 4 = 7a was most common followed by 4 + 3 = 7b. After application of the modified GS on NB, a substantial shift in GS distribution occurred: The proportion of GS 6 and 7 were 48 and 26%, respectively, with conventional Gleason grading as compared to 22 and 68%, respectively, with modified grading. In 368 men, the agreement between NB and RP with a modified GS 6, 7a, 7b and 8–10 in NB was 28, 88, 68 and 64–100%, respectively. The overall agreement improved from 58 to 72% (p < 0.001) compared to conventional GS. The higher agreement with modified Gleason grading may facilitate therapeutic decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:622 / 627
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] NUCLEAR MORPHOMETRY IN AUTOMATIC BIOPSY AND RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY SPECIMENS OF PROSTATIC-CARCINOMA - A COMPARISON
    MOHLER, JL
    METTS, JC
    ZHANG, XZ
    MAYGARDEN, SJ
    ANALYTICAL AND QUANTITATIVE CYTOLOGY AND HISTOLOGY, 1994, 16 (06): : 415 - 420
  • [22] Usefulness of the 2005 International Society of Urologic Pathology Gleason grading system in prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens
    Uemura, Hiroji
    Hoshino, Koji
    Sasaki, Takeshi
    Miyoshi, Yasuhide
    Ishiguro, Hitoshi
    Inayama, Yoshiaki
    Kubota, Yoshinobu
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 103 (09) : 1190 - 1194
  • [23] Interobserver reproducibility of modified Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimens
    Glaessgen, A
    Hamberg, H
    Pihl, CG
    Sundelin, B
    Nilsson, B
    Egevad, L
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2004, 445 (01) : 17 - 21
  • [24] Interobserver reproducibility of modified Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimens
    Axel Glaessgen
    Hans Hamberg
    Carl-Gustaf Pihl
    Birgitta Sundelin
    Bo Nilsson
    Lars Egevad
    Virchows Archiv, 2004, 445 : 17 - 21
  • [25] Gleason score correlation between prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens
    Asmae, M.
    Douida, A.
    El Fatemi, H.
    Elammari, J. E.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2019, 475 : S434 - S434
  • [26] Discrepancies between Gleason scores of needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens
    Fukagai, T
    Namiki, T
    Namiki, H
    Carlile, RG
    Shimada, M
    Yoshida, H
    PATHOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 51 (05) : 364 - 370
  • [27] Gleason score migration between prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens
    Vira, MA
    Tomaszewski, JE
    D'Amico, AV
    VanArsdalen, K
    Wein, AJ
    Malkowicz, SB
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (04): : 435 - 435
  • [28] Gleason Score Correlation Between Prostate Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Specimens
    Ozturk, Erdem
    Yikilmaz, Taha Numan
    UROONKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF UROONCOLOGY, 2018, 17 (01): : 1 - 4
  • [29] Significance of tertiary gleason pattern 5 in gleason score 7 radical prostatectomy specimens
    Whittemore, Darren E.
    Hick, Eric J.
    Carter, Mark R.
    Moul, Judd W.
    Miranda-Sousa, Alejandro J.
    Sexton, Wade J.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (02): : 516 - 522
  • [30] The prognostic significance of tertiary gleason pattern 5 in radical prostatectomy specimens
    Mosse, CA
    Epstein, JI
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2003, 83 (01) : 163A - 163A