Comparison of Three Methods for Identification of Streptococcus milleri Group Isolates to Species Level

被引:0
|
作者
A. Limia
T. Alarcón
M. L. Jiménez
M. López-Brea
机构
[1] Department of Clinical Microbiology,
[2] Hospital Universitario de la Princesa,undefined
[3] Diego de León 62,undefined
[4] 28006 Madrid,undefined
[5] Spain e-mail: mlbrea@microb.net,undefined
关键词
Clinical Isolate; Species Level; Reference Method; Commercial System; Genotypic Method;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
 A collection of 180 clinical isolates of Streptococcus milleri group were identified to species level using two phenotypic methods (a commercial system and the reference method based on differential phenotypic reactions) and a genotypic method (hybridisation of the 16S rRNA gene with species-specific probes) in order to evaluate the performance of the respective methods. A high level of agreement (80%) was observed between the results of the reference method and the genotypic method. The highest level of agreement was found for the species Streptococcus anginosus (83%), a high level of agreement (76%) also being achieved for Streptococcus constellatus and Streptococcus intermedius. The sensitivity of the commercial system compared to the genotypic method was 76% overall, but it was low (57.5%) for Streptococcus intermedius. Twenty-five strains belonged to the recently described CI strains.
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 131
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Accuracy of phenotypic methods for identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates included in surveillance programs
    Richter, Sandra S.
    Heilmann, Kristopher P.
    Dohrn, Cassie L.
    Riahi, Fathollah
    Beekmann, Susan E.
    Doern, Gary V.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2008, 46 (07) : 2184 - 2188
  • [42] Comparison of three different PCR-based methods to predict the penicillin nonsusceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from China
    Ding, J. -J.
    Su, X.
    Guo, F. -M.
    Shi, Y.
    Shao, H. -F.
    Meng, X. -Z.
    LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2009, 48 (01) : 105 - 111
  • [43] Comparison of three methods for the molecular typing of Singapore isolates of enterococci with high-level aminoglycoside resistances
    Chiew, YF
    Hall, LMC
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 1998, 38 (03) : 223 - 230
  • [44] Comparison between conventional methods, ChromAgar Candida® and PCR method for the identification of Candida species in clinical isolates
    Estrada-Barraza, Deyanira
    Davalos Martinez, Arturo
    Flores-Padilla, Luis
    Mendoza-De Elias, Roberto
    Octavio Sanchez-Vargas, Luis
    REVISTA IBEROAMERICANA DE MICOLOGIA, 2011, 28 (01): : 36 - 42
  • [45] Comparison of three molecular methods for species identification of the family Cichlidae in Kwan Phayao, Thailand
    Panprommin, Dutrudi
    Soontornprasit, Kanyanat
    Pangeson, Tanapat
    MITOCHONDRIAL DNA PART A, 2019, 30 (01) : 184 - 190
  • [46] COMPARISON BETWEEN DIFFERENT METHODS OF LEVEL IDENTIFICATION
    Pfante, Oliver
    Bertschinger, Nils
    Olbrich, Eckehard
    Ay, Nihat
    Jost, Juergen
    ADVANCES IN COMPLEX SYSTEMS, 2014, 17 (02):
  • [47] Comparison of three molecular methods for typing Aeromonas popoffii isolates
    Soler, L
    Figueras, MJ
    Chacón, MR
    Guarro, J
    Martinez-Murcia, AJ
    ANTONIE VAN LEEUWENHOEK INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL AND MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY, 2003, 83 (04): : 341 - 349
  • [48] Comparison of three molecular methods for typing Aeromonas popoffii isolates
    Lara Soler
    Maria Jose Figueras
    Matilde R. Chacón
    Josep Guarro
    Antonio J. Martinez-Murcia
    Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2003, 83 : 341 - 349
  • [49] Comparison among three methods for mycobacteria identification
    Mondragón-Barreto, M
    Vázquez-Chacón, CA
    Barrón-Rivero, C
    Acosta-Blanco, P
    Jost, KC
    Balandrano, S
    Olivera-Díaz, H
    SALUD PUBLICA DE MEXICO, 2000, 42 (06): : 484 - 489
  • [50] A comparison of three methods of symptom cluster identification
    Donovan, Heidi
    Sherwood, Paula
    Bender, Catherine
    Cohen, Susan
    Crighton, Margaret
    Lu, Xiaoli
    Sereika, Susan
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2008, 35 (03) : 552 - 553