Use of low-fidelity models with machine-learning error correction for well placement optimization

被引:0
|
作者
Haoyu Tang
Louis J. Durlofsky
机构
[1] Stanford University,Department of Energy Resources Engineering
来源
Computational Geosciences | 2022年 / 26卷
关键词
Well placement optimization; Reservoir simulation; Error model; Multifidelity; Machine learning;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Well placement optimization is commonly performed using population-based global stochastic search algorithms. These optimizations are computationally expensive due to the large number of multiphase flow simulations that must be conducted. In this work, we present an optimization framework in which these simulations are performed with low-fidelity (LF) models. These LF models are constructed from the underlying high-fidelity (HF) geomodel using a global transmissibility upscaling procedure. Tree-based machine-learning methods, specifically random forest and light gradient boosting machine, are applied to estimate the error in objective function value (in this case net present value, NPV) associated with the LF models. In the offline (preprocessing) step, preliminary optimizations are performed using LF models, and a clustering procedure is applied to select a representative set of 100–150 well configurations to use for training. HF simulation is then performed for these configurations, and the tree-based models are trained using an appropriate set of features. In the online (runtime) step, optimization with LF models, with the machine-learning correction, is conducted. Differential evolution is used for all optimizations. Results are presented for two example cases involving the placement of vertical wells in 3D bimodal channelized geomodels. We compare the performance of our procedure to optimization using HF models. In the first case, 25 optimization runs are performed with both approaches. Our method provides an overall speedup factor of 46 relative to optimization using HF models, with the best-case NPV within 1% of the HF result. In the second case fewer HF optimization runs are conducted (consistent with actual practice), and the overall speedup factor with our approach is about 8. In this case, the best-case NPV from our procedure exceeds the HF result by 3.8%.
引用
收藏
页码:1189 / 1206
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Machine Learning-Based Edge Placement Error Analysis and Optimization: A Systematic Review
    Ngo, Anh Tuan
    Dey, Bappaditya
    Halder, Sandip
    De Gendt, Stefan
    Wang, Changhai
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING, 2023, 36 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [22] Committee Machine Learning for Electrofacies-Guided Well Placement and Oil Recovery Optimization
    Amosu, Adewale
    Bui, Dung
    Oke, Oluwapelumi
    Koray, Abdul-Muaizz
    Kubi, Emmanuel Appiah
    Sibaweihi, Najmudeen
    Ampomah, William
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2025, 15 (06):
  • [23] Use of Machine Learning Methods to Reduce Predictive Error of Groundwater Models
    Xu, Tianfang
    Valocchi, Albert J.
    Choi, Jaesik
    Amir, Eyal
    GROUNDWATER, 2014, 52 (03) : 448 - 460
  • [24] An Evaluation of the Use of Low-Fidelity and High-Fidelity Mannequins in Clinical Simulations in a Module Preparing Final Year Children's and General Nursing Students for Internship Placement
    Hill, Katie
    Schumann, Michaela
    Farren, Linda
    Clerkin, Rosemary
    COMPREHENSIVE CHILD AND ADOLESCENT NURSING-BUILDING EVIDENCE FOR PRACTICE, 2023, 46 (04): : 295 - 308
  • [25] The Influence of Motion Data Low-Pass Filtering Methods in Machine-Learning Models
    Wang, Shuaijie
    Pitts, Jessica
    Purohit, Rudri
    Shah, Himani
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2025, 15 (04):
  • [26] Using machine-learning models to understand nonlinear relationships between land use and travel
    Cao, Jason
    Tao, Tao
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 123
  • [27] Multi-solution well placement optimization using ensemble learning of surrogate models
    Salehian, Mohammad
    Sefat, Morteza Haghighat
    Muradov, Khafiz
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 210
  • [28] Machine Learning Approaches for Error Correction of Hydraulic Simulation Models for Canal Flow Schemes
    Torres-Rua, Alfonso F.
    Ticlavilca, Andres M.
    Walker, Wynn R.
    McKee, Mac
    JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 2012, 138 (11) : 999 - 1010
  • [29] Hybrid modeling of karstic springs: Error correction of conceptual reservoir models with machine learning
    Bouhafa N.
    Sakarovitch C.
    Lalague L.
    Goulard F.
    Pryet A.
    Water Supply, 2024, 24 (05) : 1559 - 1573
  • [30] Machine-learning assisted optimization algorithms for the accelerated development of transferable coarse-grained models
    Deshmukh, Sanket
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2018, 255