Use of low-fidelity models with machine-learning error correction for well placement optimization

被引:0
|
作者
Haoyu Tang
Louis J. Durlofsky
机构
[1] Stanford University,Department of Energy Resources Engineering
来源
Computational Geosciences | 2022年 / 26卷
关键词
Well placement optimization; Reservoir simulation; Error model; Multifidelity; Machine learning;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Well placement optimization is commonly performed using population-based global stochastic search algorithms. These optimizations are computationally expensive due to the large number of multiphase flow simulations that must be conducted. In this work, we present an optimization framework in which these simulations are performed with low-fidelity (LF) models. These LF models are constructed from the underlying high-fidelity (HF) geomodel using a global transmissibility upscaling procedure. Tree-based machine-learning methods, specifically random forest and light gradient boosting machine, are applied to estimate the error in objective function value (in this case net present value, NPV) associated with the LF models. In the offline (preprocessing) step, preliminary optimizations are performed using LF models, and a clustering procedure is applied to select a representative set of 100–150 well configurations to use for training. HF simulation is then performed for these configurations, and the tree-based models are trained using an appropriate set of features. In the online (runtime) step, optimization with LF models, with the machine-learning correction, is conducted. Differential evolution is used for all optimizations. Results are presented for two example cases involving the placement of vertical wells in 3D bimodal channelized geomodels. We compare the performance of our procedure to optimization using HF models. In the first case, 25 optimization runs are performed with both approaches. Our method provides an overall speedup factor of 46 relative to optimization using HF models, with the best-case NPV within 1% of the HF result. In the second case fewer HF optimization runs are conducted (consistent with actual practice), and the overall speedup factor with our approach is about 8. In this case, the best-case NPV from our procedure exceeds the HF result by 3.8%.
引用
收藏
页码:1189 / 1206
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Use of low-fidelity models with machine-learning error correction for well placement optimization
    Tang, Haoyu
    Durlofsky, Louis J.
    COMPUTATIONAL GEOSCIENCES, 2022, 26 (05) : 1189 - 1206
  • [2] Preliminary development of machine learning-based error correction model for low-fidelity reactor physics simulation
    Oktavian, M. R.
    Nistor, J.
    Gruenwald, J. T.
    Xu, Y.
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2023, 187
  • [3] Error analysis of low-fidelity models for wake steering based on field measurements
    Letizia, Stefano
    Doubrawa, Paula
    Martinez-Tossas, Luis A.
    Maric, Emina
    SCIENCE OF MAKING TORQUE FROM WIND, TORQUE 2024, 2024, 2767
  • [4] Context-aware learning of hierarchies of low-fidelity models for multi-fidelity uncertainty quantification
    Farcas, Ionut-Gabriel
    Peherstorfer, Benjamin
    Neckel, Tobias
    Jenko, Frank
    Bungartz, Hans-Joachim
    COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2023, 406
  • [5] On Low-Fidelity Models for Variable-Fidelity Simulation-Driven Design Optimization of Compact Wideband Antennas
    Koziel, Slawomir
    Unnsteinsson, Sigmar D.
    Bekasiewicz, Adrian
    2018 22ND INTERNATIONAL MICROWAVE AND RADAR CONFERENCE (MIKON 2018), 2018, : 1 - 4
  • [6] Effective Machine-Learning Models for Predicting Routability During FPGA Placement
    Martin, T.
    Areibi, S.
    Grewal, G.
    2021 ACM/IEEE 3RD WORKSHOP ON MACHINE LEARNING FOR CAD (MLCAD), 2021,
  • [7] Leveraging low-fidelity data to improve machine learning of sparse high-fidelity thermal conductivity data via transfer learning
    Liu, Z.
    Jiang, M.
    Luo, T.
    MATERIALS TODAY PHYSICS, 2022, 28
  • [8] Machine-learning correction to density-functional crystal structure optimization
    Hussein, Robert
    Schmidt, Jonathan
    Barros, Tomas
    Marques, Miguel A. L.
    Botti, Silvana
    MRS BULLETIN, 2022, 47 (08) : 765 - 771
  • [9] Machine-learning correction to density-functional crystal structure optimization
    Robert Hussein
    Jonathan Schmidt
    Tomás Barros
    Miguel A. L. Marques
    Silvana Botti
    MRS Bulletin, 2022, 47 : 765 - 771
  • [10] Machine Learning Models for Edge Placement Error Based Etch Bias
    Meng, Yang
    Kim, Young-Chang
    Guo, Shujie
    Shu, Zhongli
    Zhang, Yingchun
    Liu, Qingwei
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING, 2021, 34 (01) : 42 - 48