共 50 条
HDR Brachytherapy Dose Distribution is Influenced by the Metal Material of the Applicator
被引:0
|作者:
Chin-Hui Wu
Yi-Jen Liao
An-Cheng Shiau
Hsin-Yu Lin
Yen-Wan Hsueh Liu
Shih-Ming Hsu
机构:
[1] Institute of Nuclear Engineering and Science,Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences
[2] National Tsing Hua University,Department of Radiation Oncology
[3] School of Medical Laboratory Science and Biotechnology,undefined
[4] Taipei Medical University,undefined
[5] National Yang-Ming University,undefined
[6] Medical Physics Research Center,undefined
[7] Institute for Radiological Research,undefined
[8] Chang Gung University. Chang Gung Memorial Hospital,undefined
[9] Saint Mary’s Hospital Luodong,undefined
[10] Biophotonics and Molecular Imaging Research Center,undefined
[11] National Yang-Ming University,undefined
来源:
关键词:
D O I:
暂无
中图分类号:
学科分类号:
摘要:
Applicators containing metal have been widely used in recent years when applying brachytherapy to patients with cervical cancer. However, the high dose rate (HDR) treatment-planning system (TPS) that is currently used in brachytherapy still assumes that the treatment environment constitutes a homogeneous water medium and does not include a dose correction for the metal material of the applicator. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the HDR 192Ir dose distribution in cervical cancer patients when performing brachytherapy using a metal-containing applicator. Thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) measurements and Monte Carlo N-Particle eXtended (MCNPX) code were used to explore the doses to the rectum and bladder when using a Henschke applicator containing metal during brachytherapy. When the applicator was assumed to be present, the absolute dose difference between the TLD measurement and MCNPX simulation values was within approximately 5%. A comparison of the MCNPX simulation and TPS calculation values revealed that the TPS overestimated the International Commission of Radiation Units and Measurement (ICRU) rectum and bladder reference doses by 57.78% and 49.59%, respectively. We therefore suggest that the TPS should be modified to account for the shielding effects of the applicator to ensure the accuracy of the delivered doses.
引用
收藏
相关论文