An indication of current views of Australian general practitioners towards chiropractic and osteopathy: A cross-sectional study

被引:18
|
作者
Engel R.M. [1 ]
Beirman R. [2 ]
Grace S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Macquarie University, Department of Chiropractic, Sydney, 2109, NSW
[2] Central Queensland University, School of Medical and Applied Sciences, Sydney
[3] Southern Cross University, School of Health and Human Sciences, Lismore
关键词
Chiropractic; Complementary Medicine; General Practitioners; Osteopathy;
D O I
10.1186/s12998-016-0119-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: While the role of complementary medicine therapies such as chiropractic and osteopathy is yet to be clearly delineated in the Australian context, demand for these services remains high. The attitudes of general practitioners towards chiropractors and osteopaths may have played a part in producing this outcome. However, this view is based on data that were more than 10 years old. Current anecdotal evidence suggests that the previous level of support may be declining in sections of the Australian medical profession. An assessment of the current views of general practitioners towards chiropractors and osteopaths is called for. The results being reported here represent the first stage of this assessment. Methods: This cross-sectional study was designed as a quantitative descriptive study using an anonymous online survey that included closed and open-ended questions with opportunities provided for free text. The target population was Australian general practitioners. Inclusion criteria included current medical registration, membership of the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners and currently practicing as a general practitioner in Australia. The data being reported here were collected between May and December, 2014. Results: There were 630 respondents to the online survey during this period representing a response rate of 2.6 %. Results were not uniform for the two professions. More general practitioners believed chiropractic education was not evidence-based compared to osteopathic education (70 % and 50 % respectively) while scope of practice was viewed as similar for both professions. A majority of general practitioners had never referred a patient to either profession (chiropractic: 60 %; osteopathy: 66 %) with approximately two-thirds not interested in learning more about their education (chiropractors: 68 %; osteopaths: 63 %). Conclusions: This study provides an indication of the current views of Australian general practitioners towards chiropractors and osteopaths. The findings suggest that attitudes may have become less favourable with a growing intolerance towards both professions. If confirmed, this has the potential to impact health service provision. The results from this cross-sectional study suggest that obtaining representative general practitioner views using online surveys is difficult and another approach is needed to supplement or replace the current recruitment strategy.' © 2016 The Author(s).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Current lung cancer screening practice amongst general practitioners in Western Australia: a cross-sectional study
    Manners, David
    Wilcox, Helen
    McWilliams, Annette
    Piccolo, Francesco
    Liira, Helena
    Brims, Fraser
    INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2018, 48 (01) : 78 - 80
  • [32] Current status and continuing medical education need for general practitioners in Tibet, China: a cross-sectional study
    Yang, Sen
    Zhao, Huaxin
    Zhang, Hanzhi
    Wang, Junpeng
    Jin, Hua
    Stirling, Kyle
    Ge, Xuhua
    Ma, Le
    Pu, Zhen
    Niu, Xiaomin
    Yu, Dehua
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [33] IDENTIFYING THE NEEDS AND VIEWS OF GENERAL PRACTITIONERS REGARDING INHALER DEVICE USE: A CROSS-SECTIONAL SURVEY IN GENERAL PRACTICE
    Cvetkovski, B.
    Bosnic-Anticevich, S.
    Kritikos, V
    Yan, K.
    Price, D.
    Hespe, C.
    RESPIROLOGY, 2020, 25 : 46 - 46
  • [34] General practitioners’ views and preferences about quality improvement feedback in preventive care: a cross-sectional study in Switzerland and France
    Paul Sebo
    Hubert Maisonneuve
    Jean-Pascal Fournier
    Nicolas Senn
    Dagmar M. Haller
    Implementation Science, 12
  • [35] General practitioners' views on use of patient reported outcome measures in primary care: a cross-sectional survey and qualitative study
    Turner, Grace M.
    Litchfield, Ian
    Finnikin, Sam
    Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee
    Calvert, Melanie
    BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [36] General practitioners' views and preferences about quality improvement feedback in preventive care: a cross-sectional study in Switzerland and France
    Sebo, Paul
    Maisonneuve, Hubert
    Fournier, Jean-Pascal
    Senn, Nicolas
    Haller, Dagmar M.
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2017, 12
  • [37] General practitioners’ views on use of patient reported outcome measures in primary care: a cross-sectional survey and qualitative study
    Grace M. Turner
    Ian Litchfield
    Sam Finnikin
    Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi
    Melanie Calvert
    BMC Family Practice, 21
  • [38] General practitioners' knowledge of and attitudes towards prescribing psychoactive drugs in dementia care: a cross-sectional questionnaire study
    Dhuny, Sheefah
    Foley, Tony
    Jennings, Aisling
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 190 (02) : 667 - 675
  • [39] General practitioners’ knowledge of and attitudes towards prescribing psychoactive drugs in dementia care: a cross-sectional questionnaire study
    Sheefah Dhuny
    Tony Foley
    Aisling Jennings
    Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -), 2021, 190 : 667 - 675
  • [40] Knowledge towards Zika among medical students, interns and general practitioners in Indonesia: A cross-sectional study in Aceh
    Harapan, Harapan
    Mudatsir, Mudatsir
    Indah, Rosaria
    Utomo, Prattama S.
    Anwar, Samsul
    Wahyuniati, Nur
    Maulana, Reza
    Ichsan, Ichsan
    Aletta, Alma
    Ikram, Ikram
    Ramadana, Muhammad R.
    Rajamoorthy, Yogambigai
    Setiawan, Abdul M.
    Wagner, Abram L.
    Andalas, Mohd
    CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GLOBAL HEALTH, 2019, 7 (04): : 542 - 545