Optimal Transvenous Coil Position on Active-can Single-coil ICD Defibrillation Efficacy: A Simulation Study

被引:0
|
作者
Fei Yang
Robert Patterson
机构
[1] University of Minnesota,The Bakken Medical Instrumentation and Device Laboratory, Institute for Engineering in Medicine
来源
关键词
Implantable defibrillator; Defibrillation modeling; Thoracic modeling; Critical mass; Myocardium damage;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The implantable cardioverter defibrillator with an active can and a single coil lead is effective in treating ventricular fibrillation, but the lead placement associated with the high defibrillation efficacy is still controversial and remains largely empirical. In this study, an anatomically realistic finite difference model of the thorax was developed based on MRI cross-sectional images of a human thorax to examine the effect of transvenous coil placement on defibrillation efficacy. Four electrode configurations with the coil was placed, respectively, in the right ventricular (RV) apex, in the middle of RV cavity, along the free wall in RV, or along the septal wall in RV, were simulated and their defibrillation efficacies were evaluated based on a set of metrics including voltage defibrillation threshold, current defibrillation threshold, interelectrode impedance, potential gradient distribution uniformity, current density distribution, and myocardium damage. It was found that the optimal electrode configuration is to position the coil in the middle of the RV cavity. The results were compared with the results from a simplified thoracic model. The comparison indicates that for a given electrode configuration a simplified representation of the thorax may overestimate defibrillation efficacy.
引用
收藏
页码:1659 / 1667
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Optimal transvenous coil position on active-can single-coil ICD defibrillation efficacy: A simulation study
    Yang, Fei
    Patterson, Robert
    ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 36 (10) : 1659 - 1667
  • [2] Impact of transvenous lead position on active-can ICD defibrillation: A computer simulation study
    Aguel, F
    Eason, JC
    Trayanova, NA
    Siekas, G
    Fishler, MG
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 22 (01): : 158 - 164
  • [3] Optimization of transvenous coil position for active can defibrillation thresholds
    Gold, MR
    Olsovsky, MR
    Degroot, PJ
    Cuello, C
    Shorofsky, SR
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 11 (01) : 25 - 29
  • [4] Clinical predictors of a high implant defibrillation threshold in patients with a transvenous biphasic active-can ICD
    Oral, H
    Gold, MR
    Patel, S
    Pelosi, F
    Michaud, GF
    Knight, BP
    Morady, F
    Strickberger, SA
    CIRCULATION, 2000, 102 (18) : 439 - 439
  • [5] Comparative efficacy of single-coil versus dual-coil ICD leads: a meta-analysis of clinical outcomes
    Shuja, Muhammad Hamza
    Shuja, Syed Hasan
    Shaheen, Fabeeha
    Hannat, Ramish
    Shakil, Firzah
    Abbasi, Abeera Farooq
    Hasan, Minal
    FUTURE CARDIOLOGY, 2025, 21 (03) : 167 - 175
  • [6] Effects of a thin-sized lead body of a transvenous single coil defibrillation lead on ICD implantation
    Schuchert, A
    Meinertz, T
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 23 (10): : 1468 - 1472
  • [7] Dual-coil vs single-coil active pectoral implantable defibrillator lead systems: defibrillation energy requirements and probability of defibrillation success at multiples of the defibrillation energy requirements
    Schulte, B
    Sperzel, J
    Carlsson, J
    Schwarz, T
    Ehrlich, W
    Pitschner, HF
    Neuzner, J
    EUROPACE, 2001, 3 (03): : 177 - 180
  • [8] Effect of an active abdominal pulse generator on defibrillation thresholds with a dual-coil, transvenous ICD lead system
    Rashba, Eric J.
    Farasat, Morteza
    Kirk, Malcolm M.
    Shorofsky, Stephen R.
    Peters, Robert W.
    Gold, Michael R.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 17 (06) : 617 - 620
  • [9] Impact of endocardial lead position on transvenous defibrillation efficacy: A simulation study
    Aguel, F
    Trayanova, NA
    Eason, JC
    Siekas, G
    Fishler, MG
    Malkin, RA
    COMPUTERS IN CARDIOLOGY 1997, VOL 24, 1997, 24 : 85 - 88
  • [10] Randomized prospective study of single coil versus dual coil defibrillation in patients with ventricular arrythmias undergoing ICD implantation
    Rinaldi, CA
    Simon, RD
    Baszko, A
    Elliott, D
    Bostock, J
    Gill, JS
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2002, 39 (05) : 102A - 102A