Effect of an active abdominal pulse generator on defibrillation thresholds with a dual-coil, transvenous ICD lead system

被引:3
|
作者
Rashba, Eric J.
Farasat, Morteza
Kirk, Malcolm M.
Shorofsky, Stephen R.
Peters, Robert W.
Gold, Michael R.
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Div Cardiol, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Brown Univ, Sch Med, Div Cardiol, Providence, RI USA
[3] Med Univ S Carolina, Div Cardiol, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
关键词
defibrillation threshold; implantable cardioverter defibrillator;
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00374.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Many patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have older lead systems, which are usually not replaced at the time of pulse generator replacement unless a malfunction is noted. Therefore, optimization of defibrillation with these lead systems is clinically important. The objective of this prospective study was to determine if an active abdominal pulse generator (Can) affects chronic defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) with a dual-coil, transvenous ICD lead system. Methods and Results: The study population consisted of 39 patients who presented for routine abdominal pulse generator replacement. Each patient underwent two assessments of DFT using a step-down protocol, with the order of testing randomized. The distal right ventricular (RV) coil was the anode for the first phase of the biphasic shocks. The proximal superior vena cava (SVC) coil was the cathode for the Lead Alone configuration (RV -> SVC). For the Active Can configuration, the SVC coil and Can were connected electrically as the cathode (RV -> SVC + Can). The Active Can configuration was associated with a significant decrease in shock impedance (39.5 +/- 5.8 Omega vs. 50.0 +/- 7.6 Omega, P < 0.01) and a significant increase in peak current (8.3 +/- 2.6 A vs. 7.2 +/- 2.4 A, P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in DFT energy (9.0 +/- 4.6 J vs. 9.8 +/- 5.2 J) or leading edge voltage (319 +/- 86 V vs. 315 +/- 83 V). An adequate safety margin for defibrillation (>= 10 J) was present in all patients with both shocking configurations. Conclusion: DFTs are similar with the Active Can and Lead Alone configurations when a dual-coil, transvenous lead is used with a left abdominal pulse generator. Since most commercially available ICDs are only available with an active can, our data support the use of an active can device with this lead system for patients who present for routine pulse generator replacement.
引用
收藏
页码:617 / 620
页数:4
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Clinical predictors of atrial defibrillation thresholds with a dual-coil, active pectoral lead system
    Rashba, EJ
    Shorofsky, SR
    Brown, T
    Peters, RW
    Gold, MR
    HEART RHYTHM, 2005, 2 (01) : 49 - 54
  • [2] REDUCTION OF DEFIBRILLATION THRESHOLDS WITH AN ACTIVE PECTORAL PULSE-GENERATOR AND A DUAL COIL LEAD
    GOLD, MR
    FOSTER, AH
    SHOROFSKY, SR
    CIRCULATION, 1995, 92 (08) : 1611 - 1611
  • [3] Optimization of atrial defibrillation with a dual-coil, active pectoral lead system
    Rashba, EJ
    Shorofsky, SR
    Peters, RW
    Gold, MR
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 15 (07) : 790 - 794
  • [4] Clinical predictors of defibrillation thresholds with an active pectoral pulse generator lead system
    Hodgson, DM
    Olsovsky, MR
    Shorofsky, SR
    Daly, B
    Gold, MR
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 25 (04): : 408 - 413
  • [5] Comparison of single- and dual-coil active pectoral defibrillation lead systems
    Gold, MR
    Olsovsky, MR
    Pelini, MA
    Peters, RW
    Shorofsky, SR
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 31 (06) : 1391 - 1394
  • [6] Clinical predictors of atrial defibrillation thresholds with a dual coil active Can lead system
    Murphy, L
    Bourouch, R
    Rashba, EJ
    Shorofsky, SR
    Gold, MR
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 37 (02) : 96A - 96A
  • [7] Effects of an active pectoral-pulse generator shell on defibrillation efficacy with a transvenous lead system
    Gold, MR
    Foster, AH
    Shorofsky, SR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1996, 78 (05): : 540 - 543
  • [8] Optimization of transvenous coil position for active can defibrillation thresholds
    Gold, MR
    Olsovsky, MR
    Degroot, PJ
    Cuello, C
    Shorofsky, SR
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 11 (01) : 25 - 29
  • [9] Predictors of High Defibrillation Threshold in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibillator Using a Transvenous Dual-Coil Lead
    Mizukami, Kazuya
    Yokoshiki, Hisashi
    Mitsuyama, Hirofumi
    Watanabe, Masaya
    Tenma, Taro
    Matsui, Yoshiro
    Tsutsui, Hiroyuki
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2015, 79 (01) : 77 - 84
  • [10] THE SUBCUTANEOUS ARRAY - A NEW LEAD ADJUNCT FOR THE TRANSVENOUS ICD TO LOWER DEFIBRILLATION THRESHOLDS
    HIGGINS, SL
    ALEXANDER, DC
    KUYPERS, CJ
    BREWSTER, SA
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 18 (08): : 1540 - 1548