Leaf optical properties during and after drought stress in triticale and maize genotypes differing in drought tolerance

被引:0
|
作者
Maciej T. Grzesiak
Władysław Filek
Tomasz Hura
Maciej Kocurek
Jan Pilarski
机构
[1] Polish Academy of Sciences,The F. Górski Institute of Plant Physiology
[2] Cracow Agricultural University,Department of Plant Physiology
来源
关键词
Drought; Maize; Triticale; Optical properties; Water potential; Leaf injury; Chlorophyll content;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The effect of a short (7 days) and prolonged (14 days) soil drought (D) on leaf optical properties (R reflectance, T transmittance and A absorbance) in PAR and NIR range of irradiation, and on changes in leaf water potential (ψ), leaf injury index (LI), leaf thickness (LT) and chlorophyll (a + b) content (Chl) was studied for maize and triticale genotypes differing in drought tolerance. Under control conditions (C) leaves of maize in comparison to triticale were better hydrated, were thicker and had higher content of chlorophyll (a + b). In non-stressed plants, small differences were observed in measurements of R, T and A. In the range from 500 to 600 nm, the differences between D-resistant and D-sensitive were observed only in transmittance (T) and in range from 700 to 1,100 nm in absorbance (A). In genotypes belonging to the group of D-sensitive T in PAR range and A in NIR range were two times higher than in D-resistant ones. However, in NIR range R for D-sensitive genotypes was lower than for D-resistant ones. The drought stress caused the decrease in ψ, Chl, LT and the increase in leaf injury index (LI). Soil drought applied within 14 days caused larger changes in these physiological characters in comparison to 7 days drought. The observed harmful influence of drought was more visible for maize than triticale. Moreover for genotypes belonging to D-sensitive ones, changes were larger than for D-resistant ones. Similar to changes in ψ, LT and LI drought stress caused changes in leaf optical properties parameters R, A and T. In the PAR range, the highest changes were observed in R, whereas changes in T and A, which were not considerable. Both in maize and triticale, increase in R was higher in plants subjected to 14 days drought than in plants exposed to drought for 7 days. In maize, increase in R was larger for D-sensitive genotype. For both species, changes in T and A of PAR range were small. In NIR range, an increase in R and A, and decrease in T were observed. After 7 days of recovery in plants subjected to shorter period of drought significant differences were still visible in most cases. The same was observed for ψ, LT, LI and Chl parameters. It shows that the period of 7 days rehydration is too short to remove the injuries caused by drought stress. This results indicate that measurements of R, T and A might be useful in practical application for the estimation of the drought tolerance level. Some limitations in the practical application for plant breeding may be caused by relatively high cost of necessary equipment.
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 442
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Phenotypic Selection of Wheat Genotypes for Drought Stress Tolerance
    Farooq, Muhammad Omer
    Kashif, Muhammad
    Khaliq, Ihsan
    Ahmed, Nisar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND BIOLOGY, 2020, 23 (03) : 509 - 514
  • [32] CHILLING STRESS EFFECT ON BIOCHEMICAL CHANGES IN CALLUS TISSUES OF MELON GENOTYPES DIFFERING IN SALT AND DROUGHT TOLERANCE
    Kusvuran, Sebnem
    Ellialtioglu, Sekure Sebnem
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2016, 25 (12A): : 5773 - 5779
  • [33] Physiological and morphological responses to water stress in Aegilops biuncialis and Triticum aestivum genotypes with differing tolerance to drought
    Molnár, I
    Gáspár, L
    Sárvári, É
    Dulai, A
    Hoffmann, B
    Molnár-Láng, M
    Galiba, G
    FUNCTIONAL PLANT BIOLOGY, 2004, 31 (12) : 1149 - 1159
  • [34] Physiological and biochemical tools useful in drought-tolerance detection in genotypes of winter triticale: Accumulation of ferulic acid correlates with drought tolerance
    Hura, Tomasz
    Grzesiak, Stanislaw
    Hura, Katarzyna
    Thiemt, Elisabeth
    Tokarz, Krzysztof
    Wedzony, Maria
    ANNALS OF BOTANY, 2007, 100 (04) : 767 - 775
  • [35] Differential accumulation of dehydrins in response to water stress for hybrid and common bermudagrass genotypes differing in drought tolerance
    Hu, Longxing
    Wang, Zhaolong
    Do, Hongmei
    Huang, Bingru
    JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 167 (02) : 103 - 109
  • [36] ANALYSIS OF MAIZE LEAF PHOTOSYNTHESIS UNDER DROUGHT STRESS
    DWYER, LM
    STEWART, DW
    TOLLENAAR, M
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 1992, 72 (02) : 477 - 481
  • [37] Stress Reactions of Maize Genotypes to Drought Stress at Different Phenophases and Recovery
    Sarkar, B.
    Savita, S. K.
    Varalaxmi, Y.
    Vanaja, M.
    Kumar, N. Ravi
    Sathish, P.
    Lakshmi, N. Jyothi
    Prabhakar, M.
    Shanker, A. K.
    Yadav, S. K.
    Maheswari, M.
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 69 (03)
  • [38] Stress Reactions of Maize Genotypes to Drought Stress at Different Phenophases and Recovery
    B. Sarkar
    S. K. Savita
    Y. Varalaxmi
    M. Vanaja
    N. Ravi Kumar
    P. Sathish
    N. Jyothi Lakshmi
    M. Prabhakar
    A. K. Shanker
    S. K. Yadav
    M. Maheswari
    Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2022, 69
  • [39] Differences in response to drought stress between triticale and maize plants expressed by the leaf gas exchange and spectrofluorimetric methods
    Hura, T.
    Grzesiak, M. T.
    Hura, K.
    Grzesiak, S.
    Rzepka, A.
    ACTA PHYSIOLOGIAE PLANTARUM, 2007, 29 : S19 - S19
  • [40] Xylem vessel radii comparison between soybean genotypes differing in tolerance to drought
    Nogueira, Marco
    Livingston, David
    Tuong, Tan
    Sinclair, Thomas R.
    JOURNAL OF CROP IMPROVEMENT, 2020, 34 (03) : 404 - 413