How Much Warming are We Committed to and How Much can be Avoided?

被引:1
|
作者
Bill Hare
Malte Meinshausen
机构
[1] Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK),Department of Environmental Sciences
[2] Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH Zurich),undefined
[3] Environmental Physics,undefined
[4] National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR),undefined
来源
Climatic Change | 2006年 / 75卷
关键词
Emission Scenario; Climate Policy; Climate Sensitivity; Geophysical Research Letter; Mitigation Scenario;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper examines different concepts of a ‘warming commitment’ which is often used in various ways to describe or imply that a certain level of warming is irrevocably committed to over time frames such as the next 50 to 100 years, or longer. We review and quantify four different concepts, namely (1) a ‘constant emission warming commitment’, (2) a ‘present forcing warming commitment’, (3) a‘zero emission (geophysical) warming commitment’ and (4) a ‘feasible scenario warming commitment’. While a ‘feasible scenario warming commitment’ is probably the most relevant one for policy making, it depends centrally on key assumptions as to the technical, economic and political feasibility of future greenhouse gas emission reductions. This issue is of direct policy relevance when one considers that the 2002 global mean temperatures were 0.8± 0.2 ∘C above the pre-industrial (1861–1890) mean and the European Union has a stated goal of limiting warming to 2 ∘C above the pre-industrial mean: What is the risk that we are committed to overshoot 2 ∘C? Using a simple climate model (MAGICC) for probabilistic computations based on the conventional IPCC uncertainty range for climate sensitivity (1.5 to 4.5 ∘C), we found that (1) a constant emission scenario is virtually certain to overshoot 2 ∘C with a central estimate of 2.0 ∘C by 2100 (4.2 ∘C by 2400). (2) For the present radiative forcing levels it seems unlikely that 2 ∘C are overshoot. (central warming estimate 1.1 ∘C by 2100 and 1.2 ∘C by 2400 with ∼10% probability of overshooting 2 ∘C). However, the risk of overshooting is increasing rapidly if radiative forcing is stabilized much above 400 ppm CO2 equivalence (1.95 W/m2) in the long-term. (3) From a geophysical point of view, if all human-induced emissions were ceased tomorrow, it seems ‘exceptionally unlikely’ that 2 ∘C will be overshoot (central estimate: 0.7 ∘C by 2100; 0.4 ∘C by 2400). (4) Assuming future emissions according to the lower end of published mitigation scenarios (350 ppm CO2eq to 450 ppm CO2eq) provides the central temperature projections are 1.5 to 2.1 ∘C by 2100 (1.5 to 2.0 ∘C by 2400) with a risk of overshooting 2 ∘C between 10 and 50% by 2100 and 1–32% in equilibrium. Furthermore, we quantify the ‘avoidable warming’ to be 0.16–0.26 ∘C for every 100 GtC of avoided CO2 emissions – based on a range of published mitigation scenarios.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 149
页数:38
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Natural Wrist : How much we can feel
    Zhang, Wanna
    Luo, Wei
    Wang, Feng
    2018 37TH CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE (CCC), 2018, : 5111 - 5115
  • [32] How Much Can We Ask of Collective Agents?
    Collins, Stephanie
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2020, 50 (07) : 815 - 831
  • [33] How much Allergology can we still afford?
    不详
    ALLERGO JOURNAL, 2009, 18 (07) : 496 - 496
  • [34] How much can we simplify a system of grains?
    Müller, M
    Herrmann, HJ
    GRANULAR GASES, 2001, 564 : 445 - 456
  • [35] How much can we clear the crystal ball?
    Stein, Seth
    Friedrich, Anke M.
    ASTRONOMY & GEOPHYSICS, 2014, 55 (02) : 11 - 17
  • [36] How much can we clear the crystal ball?
    Stein, Seth
    Friedrich, Anke M.
    Astronomy and Geophysics, 2014, 55 (02): : 11 - 17
  • [37] How much defense spending can we afford?
    Weidenbaum, M
    PUBLIC INTEREST, 2003, (151) : 52 - 61
  • [38] HOW MUCH DISEASE CAN WE PREVENT - INTRODUCTION
    HENDERSO.M
    ARCHIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 1969, 19 (03): : 381 - &
  • [39] UNIFICATION PARALLELISM - HOW MUCH CAN WE EXPLOIT
    SINGHAL, A
    PATT, YN
    LOGIC PROGRAMMING : PROCEEDINGS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN CONFERENCE, 1989, VOL 1-2, 1989, : 1135 - 1148
  • [40] Voter turnout: How much can we explain?
    Matsusaka, JG
    Palda, F
    PUBLIC CHOICE, 1999, 98 (3-4) : 431 - 446