Susceptibility artifacts induced by crowns of different materials with prepared teeth and titanium implants in magnetic resonance imaging

被引:0
|
作者
Xiaomeng Gao
Qianbing Wan
Qingping Gao
机构
[1] Central South University,Department of Stomatology, Xiangya Hospital
[2] Sichuan University,State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Prosthodontics, West China Hospital of Stomatology
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study aimed to investigate the artifacts induced by crowns composed of different materials with prepared teeth and titanium implants. Resin, metal-ceramic, ceramic and zirconia crowns were fabricated and placed onto the prepared teeth on a human cadaver head or titanium implants with prosthesis abutments on a dry human mandible. The samples were scanned on a 1.5 T MRI apparatus, and artifact areas were defined as the signal intensity and signal loss adjacent to the prosthesis and measured by a threshold tool with ImageJ2x. Data were analyzed using SPSS 22.0. Resin, ceramic, zirconia, and precious metal-ceramic crowns barely produced artifacts on the cadaver skull (p > 0.999). By contrast, pure Ti and nonprecious metal-ceramic crowns created significant artifacts (p < 0.001). The average artifacts reduction of double Au-Pt and Ag-Pd metal-ceramic crowns combined with titanium implants and abutments was 79.49 mm2 (p < 0.001) and 74.17 mm2 (p < 0.001) respectively, while artifact areas were increased in double Co-Cr and Ni–Cr metal-ceramic crowns by 150.10 mm2 (p < 0.001) and 175.50 mm2 (p < 0.001) respectively. Zirconia, ceramic and precious metal-ceramic crowns induce less MRI artifacts after tooth preparation while precious metal-ceramic crowns alleviate artifacts in combination with titanium implants.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Susceptibility artifacts induced by crowns of different materials with prepared teeth and titanium implants in magnetic resonance imaging
    Gao, Xiaomeng
    Wan, Qianbing
    Gao, Qingping
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [2] Magnetic resonance imaging artifacts produced by dental implants with different geometries
    Bohner, Lauren
    Meier, Norbert
    Gremse, Felix
    Tortamano, Pedro
    Kleinheinz, Johannes
    Hanisch, Marcel
    DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 49 (08)
  • [3] Quantification of metal-induced susceptibility artifacts associated with ultrahigh-field magnetic resonance imaging of spinal implants
    Chiba, Yusuke
    Murakami, Hideki
    Sasaki, Makoto
    Endo, Hirooki
    Yamabe, Daisuke
    Kinno, Daichi
    Doita, Minoru
    JOR SPINE, 2019, 2 (03):
  • [4] Improving geometric accuracy in the presence of susceptibility difference artifacts produced by metallic implants in magnetic resonance imaging
    Pauchard, Y
    Smith, MR
    Mintchev, MP
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2005, 24 (10) : 1387 - 1399
  • [5] Magnetic susceptibility artifacts in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Calculation of the magnetic field disturbances
    Balac, S
    Caloz, G
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 1996, 32 (03) : 1645 - 1648
  • [7] Magnetic resonance imaging for the determination of magnetic susceptibility of materials
    Beuf, O
    Briguet, A
    Lissac, M
    Davis, R
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE SERIES B, 1996, 112 (02): : 111 - 118
  • [8] Are titanium implants actually safe for magnetic resonance imaging examinations?
    Kim, Yong-Ha
    Choi, Manki
    Kim, Jae-Won
    ARCHIVES OF PLASTIC SURGERY-APS, 2019, 46 (01): : 96 - 97
  • [9] The value of magnetic resonance imaging of the postoperative spine with titanium implants
    Rupp, RE
    Ebraheim, NA
    Wong, FF
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS, 1996, 9 (04): : 342 - 346
  • [10] MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING SUSCEPTIBILITY ARTIFACTS DUE TO METALLIC FOREIGN BODIES
    Hecht, Silke
    Adams, William H.
    Narak, Jill
    Thomas, William B.
    VETERINARY RADIOLOGY & ULTRASOUND, 2011, 52 (04) : 409 - 414