Measurement of the bound-electron g-factor difference in coupled ions

被引:0
|
作者
Tim Sailer
Vincent Debierre
Zoltán Harman
Fabian Heiße
Charlotte König
Jonathan Morgner
Bingsheng Tu
Andrey V. Volotka
Christoph H. Keitel
Klaus Blaum
Sven Sturm
机构
[1] Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik,Department of Physics and Engineering
[2] ITMO University,undefined
[3] Helmholtz–Institut Jena,undefined
来源
Nature | 2022年 / 606卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Quantum electrodynamics (QED) is one of the most fundamental theories of physics and has been shown to be in excellent agreement with experimental results1–5. In particular, measurements of the electron’s magnetic moment (or g factor) of highly charged ions in Penning traps provide a stringent probe for QED, which allows testing of the standard model in the strongest electromagnetic fields6. When studying the differences between isotopes, many common QED contributions cancel owing to the identical electron configuration, making it possible to resolve the intricate effects stemming from the nuclear differences. Experimentally, however, this quickly becomes limited, particularly by the precision of the ion masses or the magnetic field stability7. Here we report on a measurement technique that overcomes these limitations by co-trapping two highly charged ions and measuring the difference in their g factors directly. We apply a dual Ramsey-type measurement scheme with the ions locked on a common magnetron orbit8, separated by only a few hundred micrometres, to coherently extract the spin precession frequency difference. We have measured the isotopic shift of the bound-electron g factor of the isotopes 20Ne9+ and 22Ne9+ to 0.56-parts-per-trillion (5.6 × 10−13) precision relative to their g factors, an improvement of about two orders of magnitude compared with state-of-the-art techniques7. This resolves the QED contribution to the nuclear recoil, accurately validates the corresponding theory and offers an alternative approach to set constraints on new physics.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 483
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Self-energy correction to the bound-electron g factor of P states
    Jentschura, Ulrich D.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2010, 81 (01):
  • [22] One-loop electron self-energy for the bound-electron g factor
    Yerokhin, V. A.
    Harman, Z.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2017, 95 (06)
  • [23] Finite nuclear size correction to the bound-electron g factor in a hydrogenlike atom
    Glazov, DA
    Shabaev, VM
    [J]. PHYSICS LETTERS A, 2002, 297 (5-6) : 408 - 411
  • [24] Non-relativistic calculations of the g-factor of a bound electron
    Karshenboim, SG
    [J]. PHYSICS LETTERS A, 2000, 266 (4-6) : 380 - 386
  • [25] Nuclear-polarization correction to the bound-electron g factor in heavy hydrogenlike ions -: art. no. 081802
    Nefiodov, AV
    Plunien, G
    Soff, G
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2002, 89 (08)
  • [26] Electron g-factor in coupled quantum wells CdTe and CdMnTe
    Afanasiev, M. M.
    Kozyrev, N. V.
    Kirstein, E.
    Kalevich, V. K.
    Zhukov, E. A.
    Mantsevich, V. N.
    Krivenko, I. S.
    Karczewski, G.
    Yakovlev, D. R.
    Kusraev, Yu G.
    Bayer, M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE PHYSICA.SPB/2019, 2019, 1400
  • [27] One-loop self-energy correction to the bound-electron g factor
    Yerokhin, VA
    Indelicato, P
    Shabaev, VM
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2002, 80 (11) : 1249 - 1254
  • [28] Nonrelativistic QED approach to the bound-electron g factor -: art. no. 150401
    Pachucki, K
    Jentschura, UD
    Yerokhin, VA
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2004, 93 (15) : 150401 - 1
  • [29] Bound electron g-factor measurement by double-resonance spectroscopy on a fine-structure transition
    von Lindenfels, David
    Brantjes, Nicolaas P. M.
    Birkl, Gerhard
    Quint, Wolfgang
    Shabaev, Vladimir M.
    Vogel, Manuel
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2011, 89 (01) : 79 - 84
  • [30] Self-energy correction to the bound-electron g factor in H-like ions -: art. no. 143001
    Yerokhin, VA
    Indelicato, P
    Shabaev, VM
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2002, 89 (14)