Protocol for a scoping review to map patient engagement in scoping reviews

被引:2
|
作者
Oravec N. [1 ]
Monnin C. [2 ]
Gregora A. [3 ]
Bjorklund B. [3 ]
Dave M.G. [4 ]
Schultz A.S.H. [5 ,6 ]
Chudyk A.M. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, AE101 - 820 Sherbrook Street, Winnipeg, R3A 1R9, MB
[2] Neil John Maclean Health Sciences Library, University of Manitoba, 727 McDermot Avenue, Winnipeg, R3E 3P5, MB
[3] Enhanced Recovery Protocols for Cardiac Surgery Patient Researcher Group, St. Boniface Hospital, 369 Taché Avenue, Winnipeg, R2H 2A6, MB
[4] Cardiac Sciences Program, CR 1005 - St. Boniface Hospital, 369 Taché Avenue, Winnipeg, R2H 2A6, MB
[5] College of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, 89 Curry Place, Winnipeg, R3T 2N2, MB
[6] Health Services and Structural Determinants of Health Research, St. Boniface Research Centre, 351 Taché Avenue, Winnipeg, R2H 2A6, MB
关键词
Health research; Knowledge synthesis; Patient and public involvement; Patient consultation; Patient-oriented research; Review;
D O I
10.1186/s40900-022-00361-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Scoping reviews of health research are increasing in popularity. However, only a minority of scoping reviews in this sector engage patients and caregivers as co-producers of the research. Despite developments in scoping review methodology, which insist that stakeholder consultation is essential, no guiding methods exist to instruct the conduct of this stage. Thus, it is necessary to understand how patients and caregivers have been engaged as part of scoping reviews, toward a unifying methodology. Methods: We have developed a protocol for a scoping review of methods used to engage patients and caregivers in scoping reviews of health research. The search strategy will comprise two phases: the first will involve a secondary analysis of retrieved articles from a prior scoping review, and the second will identify articles that cite Levac et al.’s update to the original scoping review framework by Arksey and O’Malley. Titles and full texts of retrieved articles will be screened in duplicate. Inclusion will be limited to articles related to heath research that follow the six-stage scoping review framework by Arksey and O’Malley and that report patient engagement activities during at least one stage. The method of analysis of charted variables will be decided once data have been collected. Two patients will be engaged as collaborators throughout this review. We will also consult with patients, caregivers, and researchers upon completion of preliminary analyses. Discussion: We anticipate that our scoping review will provide guidance for researchers seeking to involve health care stakeholders as co-producers of scoping reviews. © 2022, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patient Engagement in Medical Trainee Selection: A Scoping Review
    Hanson, Mark D.
    Pang, Celeste
    Springall, Elena
    Kulasegaram, Kulamakan
    Eva, Kevin W.
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2024, 99 (01) : 98 - 105
  • [22] Lived experience and family engagement in psychiatry research: A scoping review of reviews
    Hawke, Lisa D.
    Sheikhan, Natasha Y.
    Rodak, Terri
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2024, 27 (03)
  • [23] The Digital Engagement of Older People: Systematic Scoping Review Protocol
    Kebede, Abraham Sahilemichael
    Ozolins, Lise -Lotte
    Holst, Hanna
    Galvin, Kathleen
    [J]. JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2021, 10 (07):
  • [24] Patient engagement in Canada: a scoping review of the 'how' and 'what' of patient engagement in health research
    Manafo, Elizabeth
    Petermann, Lisa
    Mason-Lai, Ping
    Vandall-Walker, Virgnia
    [J]. HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2018, 16
  • [25] A scoping review on the methodological and reporting quality of scoping reviews in China
    Xue, Xinyu
    Tang, Xintong
    Liu, Shanshan
    Yu, Ting
    Chen, Zhonglan
    Chen, Ningsu
    Yu, Jiajie
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [26] Protocol for scoping review: Patient-controlled sedation
    Davodi, Jasmin
    Intzilaki, Christina V.
    Steenholdt, Casper
    Moeller, Ann M.
    [J]. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2024,
  • [27] Patient engagement in Canada: a scoping review of the ‘how’ and ‘what’ of patient engagement in health research
    Elizabeth Manafo
    Lisa Petermann
    Ping Mason-Lai
    Virginia Vandall-Walker
    [J]. Health Research Policy and Systems, 16
  • [28] Letter to the Editor on "Scoping Review on Rehabilitation Scoping Reviews" Response
    Colquhoun, Heather L.
    Jesus, Tiago S.
    O'Brien, Kelly K.
    Tricco, Andrea C.
    Chui, Adora
    Zarin, Wasifa
    Lillie, Erin
    Hitzig, Sander L.
    Seaton, Samantha
    Engel, Lisa
    Rotenberg, Shlomit
    Straus, Sharon E.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2021, 102 (02): : 340 - 342
  • [29] Patient and family engagement interventions for hospitalized patient safety: A scoping review
    Cai, Yan
    Liu, Yuan
    Wang, Cong
    Liu, Shanshan
    Zhang, Mingming
    Jiang, Yan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2024, 33 (06) : 2099 - 2111
  • [30] A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency
    Pham, Mai T.
    Rajic, Andrijana
    Greig, Judy D.
    Sargeant, Jan M.
    Papadopoulos, Andrew
    McEwen, Scott A.
    [J]. RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2014, 5 (04) : 371 - 385